Multi store memory model studies Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

What was the aim of Glanzer and Cunitz’s study?

A

To investigate if the time-interval between words on a list would increase the number of words recalled at the start of the list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What year was Glanzer and Cunitz’s study?

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Glanzer and Cunitz: Who were the participants?

A

240 Army enlisted men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Glanzer and Cunitz: What was the research design?

A

Independent samples design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Glanzer and Cunitz:
What were the two IVs?

A

Time interval between words (3,6,9 secs).
Repeat of words (once or twice).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Glanzer and Cunitz:
What was the recall task?

A

After each 20-word list, participants had 2 minutes to write down as many words as they could.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did the time interval between words affect recall?

A

Longer intervals = improved recall, except those at the end of the list (primacy effect).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is primacy effect?

A

When individuals tend to remember items at the start of a list better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why does primacy effect occur in this study?

A

Because ppants are able to rehearse the words. More time interval allowed for more rehearsal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the strengths of Glanzer and Cunitz?

A
  • Controlled setting -> increases internal validity.
  • Findings support multi-store memory model
  • Large sample size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the weaknesses of Glanzer and Cunitz?

A
  • Limited generalizability, sample only army men.
  • Artificial task of memorising one syllable words -> low ecological validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the aim of HM Milner?

A

To better understand the effects of the surgery on HM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of study was HM: Milner?

A

Longitudinal case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened to HM?

A

William Scoville performed a lobotomy on him to treat his epileptic seizures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was HM’s memory like?

A

He couldn’t remember past events (retrograde amnesia) and he couldn’t form new memories (anterograde).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the aim of the HM Milner case study?

A

To better understand the effects that the surgery had on patient HM.

17
Q

What were some of the different methods Milner used to study HM?

A

She used:
- Psychometric testing (IQ)
- Direct observations of his behaviour
- Interviews
- Cognitive tests
- MRI scan

18
Q

What types of memory could HM not acquire?

A
  • Episodic knowledge (memory for events)
  • Semantic knowledge (general world knowledge)
  • He lost long-term memory.
19
Q

What memory did HM have?

A

Working memory
Motor skills (procedural memory)

20
Q

How does “HM: Milner” support the multi-store memory model?

A

Shows that we have two distinctly separate “stores” of memory = short-term and long-term store.

21
Q

What were the strengths of HM Milner?

A
  • Method triangulation increased credibility and validity of findings.
  • High ecological validity -> no manipulated variables.
22
Q

What were the limitations of HM Milner?

A
  • Cannot be easily replicated.
  • Some aspects of the study were retrospective, we don’t know HM’s cognitive abilities before the lobotomy.