murder Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

felony murder crimes

A
BARRK: 
b-burglary (except b with intent to injure/kill)  
a- arsron 
r- rape (except statutory rape) 
r- robbery 
k- kidnapping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deadly Weapons Doctrine

A

intent to kill is inferred from the defendant’s use of an instrument that is designed to kill or that is used in a manner likely to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

malice is established by

A

Intent to Kill or intent to inflict serious bodily injury, or deadly weapons doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

depraved-heart murder

A

unintentional killing:
o Reckless or grossly negligent conduct;
o That creates an extreme risk to others; and
o Demonstrates a wanton indifference to human life and a conscious disregard of an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Unintended killing resulting from extreme risk creation that manifests a wanton disregard for human life (e.g., Russian roulette)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

effect of felony murder

A

Malice is automatically established by causing death during the commission of the “right type” of felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

felony murder rule statement

A

o An intentional or accidental killing;
o Proximately caused;
o During the commission or attempted commission;
o Of a serious or inherently dangerous felony (BARRK).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Right type of felony”

A

(1) felonies listed in a statute, or (2) felonies that are independent of the killing and inherently dangerous.

cannot be collateral like felony assault or battery where the intent is to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

abstract jurisdiction (majority)

A

is the felony, in the abstract, inherently dangerous? ex; practicing without a medical license is not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

context jurisdiction (minority)

A

was it inherently dangerous in the context?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Right connection to felony”

A

The death must be a foreseeable outgrowth of the felony.

Liberally applied – only coincidences are ruled out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Right time”

A

the death must be the result of injuries inflicted during the commission, attempt, or immediate flight from a felony.
 Felony starts when the defendant could be convicted of attempt.
 Terminates when the defendant reaches temporary safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

co-felon murder exceptions

A

1- does not know co-felons are armed and the co-felon himself is not harmed
2- police or victim kills
3- deserving victim; a co-felon is exempt from felony murder responsibility when anyone kills another co-felon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

degrees in murder

A

both need malice; there is some other ingredient that differentiates the degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

premeditation timing

A

can be brief; but sometime to contemplate and reflect to conflict murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

deliberation

A

quality of rational thought; diminished capacity or voluntary intoxication can limit the degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Second-degree murder

A

is any killing with malice, but without the additional element to prove first-degree murder. In a jurisdiction that defines first-degree murder only as murder with premeditation and deliberation, any murder committed without the purpose to kill must be second-degree murder

17
Q

voluntary manslaughter

A

intentional murder mitigated by adequate provocation

18
Q

voluntary manslaughter

mitigating circumstances

A

1- diminished mental capacity (minority) not as much as insanity
2- imperfect self-defense use of force was unreasonable

19
Q

involuntary manslaughter

A

unintentional killing- recklessness or criminal negligence

20
Q

misdemeanor manslaughter

A

died as a result of inherently dangerous misdemenor like battery or non-BARRK felony

21
Q

two issues when analyzing murder

A

actus reus + mens rea

22
Q

heat of passion trigger

A

the defendant must be adequately

provoked

23
Q

adequate provocation

A

a provocation that would lead a reasonable

or ordinary person to lose self-control and fly into a sudden homicidal rage

24
Q

first-degree elevation

A

Proof that the defendant’s decision to kill was done with
both premeditation and deliberation elevates second-degree murder to first-degree murder

The defendant must consciously decide to kill, so the only malice sufficient is intent to kill

25
example of the misdemeanor-murder rule
, a defendant can be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter where he unintentionally caused a death during the commission of a misdemeanor or a felony that is not inherently dangerous. Here, the man pushed the roommate, which was a battery, but had no intent to kill the roommate, whose fragile brain condition was a factor in his death. fact pattern: so when a simple punch or push, even if planned, ends up in death the resulting charge will likely be involuntary manslaughter
26
imperfect self-defense
when the defendant's use of self-defense is unjustified, but in an honest mistake. mitigates higher degrees of murder to voluntary manslaughter
27
self-defense rule
must be a good faith, reasonable mistake as to the necessity of using deadly force in self-defense justifies a resulting homicide
28
volitional/actus reus defense does not matter in
involuntary manslaughter because the act itself is unintentional
29
best defense for involuntary manslaughter
was not criminally negligent, reckless, or unrelated to a misdemeanor
30
difference btween solicitation and conspiracy
solitication is one person acting omn behalf of another whereas conspiracy is an agreement to work together
31
solicitation with more than two people
if the person who was working for you pawned the job off to someone else you are still liable if your intended result occurs