Murder Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Definition

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being under the queen’s peace with malice aforethough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Nedrick case and ratio

A

D poured petrol through a letterbox and lit it, a child died. He didn’t intend to kill. Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Moloney case and ratio

A

D shot his stepfather in a quick draw game. He had no intent so not guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What ruling came from Moloney

A
  1. Was death/serious injury a natural consequence of D’s actions?
  2. Did D foresee these consequences?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where did the Moloney ruling come from?

A

Lord Justice Bridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hancock and Shankland case and ratio

A

Striking miners threw a roadblock off a bridge. It killed a taxi driver. No intent so manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Woolin case and ratio

A

D threw a baby off a wall and it fractured it’s skull and died. Manslaughter as he didn’t intend or foresee?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re A case and ratio

A

Conjoined twins (one fully functioning and one parasitic) were separated. One died. The parasite could not live independently so not murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Matthews and Alleyne case and ratio

A

DD threw V into a river knowing he couldn’t swim. He died. Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gibbins and Proctor case and ratio

A

A man and his commonlaw wife starved his son to death. Omission to act was failure to feed him. Guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Attorney General Reference case and ratio

A

D stabbed pregnant girlfriend, She gave birth prematurely and it died later. Not murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bedford v The Queen

A

A policeman shot and killed a “shooter” but V’s gun was never found. D honestly believed it was self defence so NG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Clegg

A

A soldier shot a car that didn’t stop at a checkpoint. Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Martin

A

D had PPD and shot 2 intruders. His PPD gave him dim resp. ManslaughtER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Vickers

A

D broke into a shop and attacked the person living above it. Intent to cause GBH is intent still

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Cunningham

A

D repeatedly hit V with a chair but didn’t intend to kill them. Intent to cause GBH is intent

17
Q

DPP v Smith

A

A policeman jumped on V’s bonnet and he swerved him into oncoming traffic. Murder.

18
Q

AR

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being under the queen’s peace

19
Q

MR

A

Malice aforethought

20
Q

But for test

A

But for D’s actions, would V still have died

21
Q

Case for but for test

A

R v white (mother’s milk)

22
Q

De minimus rule

A

D has to be more than a minimal contribution

23
Q

Case for de minimus rule

24
Q

Thin skull rule

A

Take your victim as you find them

25
Case for thin skull rule
R v Blaue (Jehova's witness)
26
List all 4 novus actus interveniens
1. Medical treatment 2. Life support 3. Daftness test 4. V refuses treatment
27
Case for medical treatment
R v smith
28
Case for life support
Malcherek and steele
29
Case for daftness test
R v roberts
30
Cases for V refusing treatment
Blaue
31
How to answer a murder Q?
1. State the definition 2. Go through each part separately like a theft question 3. Apply at the end of each paragraph