Myeloid Flashcards
(68 cards)
translocation for APL
APL PML::RARA t(15;17)(q13.4;q21.2)
APL translocations resistant to ATRA/AsO3
‐ STAT5B::RARA or STAT3::RARA; t(17;17)(q21.2;q21.2),
inv(17), del(17)
- ZBTB16::RARA; t(11;17)(q23.2;q21.2)
Translocation for AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1
AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)
Prognosis for AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion; t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)?
Good
Cytologic features of AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion; t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)
eosinophilic globules
basophilic border, salmon-colored cell
long, thin Auer rods
Pseudo-Chediak Higashi neutrophils
Cytologic features of APL PML::RARA t(15;17)(q13.4;q21.2)
coin on coin nuclear morphology, bilobed
Auer rods
hypergranular, hypogranular, microgranular
Cytogenetic features of AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion; t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)
≥ 70% have additional karyotypic abnormality: ‐X, del(9q)
Worse prognosis mutation and IHC expression for AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion; t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)
KIT mutation
CD56
-ASXL1/2, KRAS and NRAS may also be seen
Translocation for AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion
AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)
Prognosis for AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)
Good prognosis
Cytologic features for AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)
coalescing basophilic granules
peripheral basophilic granules
abundant eosinophils
Additional molecular features for features for AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) and which make worse prognosis?
*KIT mutations (exons 8 and 17 - 30-40% cases) - worse prognosis
*FLT3 worse prognosis
Secondary cytogenetic abnormalitiesinclude +22 and +8
(each occurring in 10‐15% of cases), del(7q) and +21 (in
5%)
NRAS (in 45%), KRAS (in 13%)
AML with KMT2A rearrangements has more than 80 fusion partners. Most have a _________ prognosis. Which one has an intermediate prognosis?
most poor prognosis
KMT2A::MLLT3; t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3); Intermediate
prognosis
AML with KMT2A rearrangements have initial high blast counts with ____________ differentiation. In children, , AML with KMT2A::MLLT3 and KMT2A::MLLT10 show _____________differentiation and/or ______ blast counts
monocytic
children - megakaryoblastic, or low blast counts
AML with KMT2A rearrangements may have _______ overexpression leading to worse prognosis
MECOM
Translocation for AML with DEK::NUP214 fusion
AML with DEK::NUP214 fusion t(6;9)(p23;q34.1)
*mostly sole karyotypic abnormality
AML with DEK::NUP214 has blasts with __________ features
monocytic
Additional molecular feature common in AML with DEK::NUP214
FLT3-ITD
*may benefit from midostaurin or gilterinib
Translocation for AML with MECOM rearrangement
AML with MECOM rearrangement inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)
Prognosis of AML with MECOM rearrangement inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)
Poor prognosis
Cytologic features of AML with MECOM rearrangement inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)
Megakaryocyte dysplasia
multilineage dysplasia
Cytogenetic features of AML with MECOM rearrangement inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)
Often associated with ‐7 (>50% of cases),
del(5q) and complex karyotypes
Other associated molecular findings in AML with MECOM rearrangement inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)
- mutations of RAS/receptor tyrosine kinase signaling
pathways(NRAS, PTPN11, FLT3, KRAS, NF1, CBL, KIT)
-Other associated mutations: GATA2, RUNX1, SF3B1
Translocation for AML with RBM15::MRTFA fusion
AML with RBM15::MRTFA fusion t(1;22)(p13.3;q13.1)