Names and experiments Flashcards

1
Q

Turing

A

1950 - mind as computer model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rosch 1978

A

Hierarchical categorisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tafjel and Wilkes 1963

A

Line A/B length

-can perception be skewed by categorisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tafjels principle

A

The accentuation principle (line A/B thing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hogg and vaughn 2005

A

Welsh men are better singers

can the accentuation principle be applied to social situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sherif et al. 1961

A

Boys at summer camp (eagles vs rattlers)

Competition between groups causes rivalry? can be brought back together with co-operation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Realistic conflict theory

A

When two groups are in competition for a resource conflict emerges leading to prejudice and poor intergroup categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tafjel et. al 1971

A

The minimal group paradigm

boys art/ meaningless group membership leads to conflict/favouritism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Asch

A

Central vs peripheral traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Loren Carpenter

A

Pong game

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Campbell 1958

A

How to classify a group (CF, P, S)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hamilton and Sherman 1996

A

-opinions of groups/group members can be effected by cohesiveness of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Latane, Williams and Harkins 1979

A

effect of group size on social loafing (clapping)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Karau and Williams 1997

A

effect on group cohesiveness on loafing (touch typing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Latane and Darley 1968

A

Bystander effect (smokey room)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Levine and Crowther 2008

A

Large group doesn’t guarantee bystander effect because empathy for victim comes into it (shouting at woman experimenter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tafjel and Turner 1979

A

SIT & SIT scale:
Belief system: social change —> social mobility
behaviour system: Intergroup –> inter personal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Social Identity Theory:

A

Tafjel and Turner 1979
That definition of self comes largely from group memberships. People take pride and self esteem from their ingroups so tend to favour them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Turner et al 1987

A

Self categorisation theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Self categorisation theory

A

Explains peoples cognition and behaviour as part of a group - depends on context (crate as chair/hierarchical)

21
Q

Chameleon concept

A

We change certain aspects of our identity depending on context but there are some things that always remain the same

22
Q

Markus 1977 1

A

Experiments on schema’s - Do they aid faster processing? (1) Independent/dependent/aschematic - response time to adjectives measured

23
Q

Markus 1977 2

A

Experiments on schema’s - suggestibility test - are schemas resistant to change/contradictory information? (stronger schemas = more resistant)

24
Q

Ornato and Turner 2004

A

The fluid self - change self depending on salient context - intergroup or interpersonal behaviour

25
Markus and Kitayama 1991
western vs eastern self | interdependent or independent self
26
Higgins 1987
Self discrepancy theory | -discrepancies between different types of self will lead to discomfort
27
Wood, Purunovic and Lee 2009
-positive statements in the mirror - self esteem/mood boost?
28
Dovidio Evans and Tyler 1986
Black or white prime followed by ''could this trait be considered stereotypical of this race?'' - shows evidence for mental stereotyping
29
Devine 1989
- dissociable processes involved in stereotyping | - knowledge and activation doesn't = expression of stereotype
30
Devine 1989 1
Ps give a list of black cultural stereotypes undertake modern racism scale questionnaire (same characteristics given by both racist and non racist peeps) -testing knowledge of stereotypes across prejudice and no prejudice
31
Devine 1989 2
1/2 Ps primed with black racial stereotype words (rhythm, slavery, athleticism, basketball) Presented with Donalds day Primed Ps perceive him as more aggressive -prejudice and non prejudice associate black with aggression (closely linked schemas) -mere knowledge of stereotypes is enough to prompt discrimination
32
Devine 1989
Ps asked to put down thoughts about black people Prejudice gave more negative traits more often -Can we consciously reject unconscious stereotypes?
33
Macrae, Milne and Bodenhausen 1994
The dual task paradigm (listening to the podcast and memorising traits of 4 characters) does stereotyping free up processing capacity for other tasks
34
Correll et al 2002
Policemans dilemma | -consequences of racial stereotyping
35
Macrae et al 1994
Skinhead passage thing | -What effect does suppressing stereotypes have? behavioural and cognitive
36
Steele and Aaronson 1995
Blacks and whites at golf | Does stereotyping effect performance?
37
Moss-Racusin 2012
Changed the gender in a CV | Does gender stereotyping effect perception of individual/prospects for work
38
Kawakami et al. 2000
Press and say no to link between two concepts | can temporarily erase subconscious stereotypes
39
Festinger and carlsmith 1959
Turning pegs upside down then oping in another P | Cognitive dissonance
40
Freedman and Fraser 1966
Foot in the door compliance
41
Cardinal et al 1975
Door in the face compliance is based on rejection moderation
42
Cialdini et al 1975
door in the face
43
Cialdini et a 1978
Low balling
44
Biligs 1996
There are no underlying principles for persuasion or they would have been found out already
45
Milgrim
Electric shock teacher student | -When absolved of responsibility for consequences people are much more obedient
46
Allport 1954
Contact hypothesis
47
Stephan & Stephan 2005
Interventions to reduce prejudice: - Promoting multiculturalism through education - diversity training in groups - organised intergroup dialogues - cooperative learning groups
48
Wright et al 1997
Extended contact in reducing prejudice
49
levine et al 2005
man utd supporter vs football supporter | -shared category membership should lead to increased willingness to help