Negligence Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

Who is the claimant?

A

The claimant is the person who has suffered and is bringing the claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is stage one of negligence?

A

Duty of Care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will the case of Robinson V CCWY be used?

A

If it is well established that a duty should exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case gives the relationship between medical practitioners and patients?

A

Wilsher V Essex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case gives the relationship between vehicle user and other road users?

A

Nettleship V Weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case gives the relationship between police and other HM services?

A

Robinson V CCWY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case gives gives the relationship between manufacturer and customers?

A

Donoghue V Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is the case of Caparo V Dickman used?

A

Only used is novel situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the three parts of the caparo test?

A

•Was the damage or harm reasonably foreseeable?
•We’re the d and c proximate?
• Is it FJR to impose a duty?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case asks was the harm reasonably foreseeable?

A

Kent V Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case asks were the defendant and claimant proximate?

A

Bourhill V Young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case asks is it FJR to impose a duty?

A

Hill V CC of WY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is stage two of negligence?

A

Breach of Duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case tells us the standard of the reasonable person?

A

Blyth V BWW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What case tells us the standard of the reasonable child of the same age?

A

Mullins V Richard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case tells us the standard of a competent body of fellow professionals?

A

Bolam V Friern HMC

17
Q

What does the case of Bolitho V CHA tell us?

A

It must be a logical decision

18
Q

What case tells us there are no allowances for inexperience?

A

Nettleship V Weston

19
Q

What are the five risk factors?

A

•size of risk
•appropriate precautions
•known risks
•special characteristics of the claimant
•social utility

20
Q

What case is used for size of risk?

A

Bolton V Stone

21
Q

What case is used for appropriate precautions?

A

Latimer v AEC

22
Q

What case is used for known risks?

23
Q

What case is used for special characteristics of the claimant?

A

Paris V Stepney

24
Q

What case is used for social utility?

25
What does the case of Montgomery tell us?
The patient should be told all material risks, including whatever the patient wan to to know
26
What is stage three of negligence?
Damage
27
What case determines the ‘but for’ test?
Barnett V Chelsea
28
What are the three unforeseeable and overwhelming acts?
• act of the claimant • act of a third party • act of a natural event
29
What case is used for act of the claimant?
Mckew V Holland
30
What case is used for act of a third party?
Knightly V Johns
31
What case is used for a natural event?
Carslogie
32
What does the case of The Wagon Mound tell us?
General type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable
33
What does the case of Bradford V Robinson Rentals tell us?
It is irrelevant if it more serious, or happens in an unexpected way, as long as the general type of damage is reasonably foreseeable
34
What does the ‘eggshell skull’ rule tell us?
If the damage is more serious because the claimant had a pre-existing conditions, the D is liable for the subsequent consequences
35
What case is used for the ‘eggshell skull’ rule?
Smith V Leech Brain and Co