negligence Flashcards
(37 cards)
Negligence
duty
breach
causation
damages
Duty
I only owe a duty to foreseeable plaintiffs in the zone of danger
must act as a
reasonably prudent person
Duty of a landowner
Unknown trespasser- no duty of care to unknown trespasser
known trespasser- duty to warn of known dangers
licensee (social guest)- personal (not business)– duty to warn of known dangers
invitee- business–warn, inspect, and make safe
Duty of a parent to supervise or control their child
parent knows or should have known their child would cause harm
duty to aid someone
no duty, except if i try to render aid, then i must exercise reasonable care
if i see someone drowning and something bad happens,
not liable if i exercised reasonable
duty to aid because of special relationship
common carrier- train plane, innkeeper, teacher student
they have a duty no matter what
duty of a child
has to act like children of age, maturity, etc.
duty of professional
act like similar professionals in the community
breach
failure to comply with duty of care
causation
two types
actual cause
but for d’s actions no harm would have occurred
proximate cause
if it was foreseaable
you need both
for a case of negligence
is it foreseeable that if i was texting and driving
you would hit car in front. yes
foreseeabilitiy will be a question
of fact
damages
actual physical injury
relates to
p and d
what happens if you break your leg and now a bunch of shit happens
intervening- foreseeable– will pay for all damages
superseding- cuts off the other things
superseding if
1) act of god
2) intentional tort
3) criminal act
4) anything fact patter says is unforeseeable
almost everything is
foreseeable
negligence per se
1) violation of ordinance
2) injured party is about class of ppl trying to protect
3) injury is kind of injury trying to protect
res ipsa
1) whatever occurred does not normally happen absent negligence
2) exclusive control of instrumentality
raises an inference of negligence