negligence Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

what is the purpose of negligence

A

to but the c back into the position they were in before the incident by providing compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 3 elements of negligence

A

1 duty of care must be owed by d to c
2 d breaches the duty
3 damage as a result of the breach
a factual causation
b remoteness of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the first test you would use to establish a duty of care

A

robinson test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the two parts of the robinson test

A

1- is there a duty through judicial p or statute
2- can duty of care by established through analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the second test you would use to establish a duty of care (only is robinson dosent apply)

A

caparo test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the 3 parts of the caparo test

A

1- is the damage reasonably forseeable
2-is there proximity between parties-space time relationship
3-is it fair just and reasonable to impose a doc (mainly for police/firemen)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case is the basis for law of negligence

A

donoghue v stevenson-neibour principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what cases developed the law of negligence after dvs

A

caparo v dickman -3 part test
robinson- caparo is only for novel situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what test is used to define a breach of duty of care

A

reasonable person test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what case formed the reasonable person test

A

blyth v birmingham waterworks co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is a reasonable person defined as

A

someone who completes a task competently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what special characteristics of the d do the court consider

A

professional
learner
under 18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if the d is a professional in their feild what must c prove

A

the professional conduct fell below a reasonably competent professional in that area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is there are two ways for the professional to do a task

A

the court will accept both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is no one knows an outcome is possible

A

a reasonable person cannot be expected to take risks against something unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of a case, when no one knew a possible outcome

A

roe v minister of health

17
Q

what is the standard of care for someone who is learning?

A

That have a competent person with that skillor professional

18
Q

Give an example of a case relating to learners

A

nettelship v western

19
Q

to what standard are children held to

A

Thought of a reasonably competent person of the same age

20
Q

give the case, example, relating to children

A

mullins v richard’s

21
Q

what does the case Paris V Stepney Borough Council tell us?

A

You expected to take more care for disabled people/the claimants characteristics can affect the liability of the defendant

22
Q

what are risk factors?

A

Those that a reasonable person would take into account to modify their behaviour

23
Q

what are some of the different categories of risk factors?

A

Special characteristics
Size of risk
Adequate precautions
Unknown risk
Public policy

24
Q

Give two case examples relating to the risk of harm

A

Bolton V stone
Miller v Jackson

25
What is the aim of public policy?
When normal precautions are minimised for the greater good emergency situations
26
Give a case example for public policy
watt v heartfordshire county council
27
Describe adequate precautions
The reasonable person does everything in their power to prevent damage, but they don’t have to take all possible precautions if they are excessive
28
What are the two ways damage is proven?
factual causation Remoteness of damage
29
How is factual damage proven?
But for test
30
give the case, example, for factual causation
Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington
31
what is the test for remote of damage?
Reasonable for see ability
32
Describe remoteness of damage
The harm or injury, suffered must not be too remote, which is to say unforseeable
33
What case does remoteness of damage come from?
The wagon mound
34
What three things can the chain of causation be broken by?
an act of the claimant An act by nature An act by a third-party
35
what case said it doesn’t matter how extreme the damages, as long as the type of damage is caused is foreseeable
Bradford v Robinson rentals
36
what is the eggshell skull rule
You must take your victim as you find them
37
give a case, example, for the eggshell skull rule
Smith V. Leach brain
38
What happens if something is unknown to science
It is not reasonably foreseeable, so no liability
39
Give a case relating to something unknown to science
Docherty v Turner