Negligence Flashcards
(48 cards)
Elements of negligence claim
Duty of care? Breach of duty? Causation (factual/legal)? Damage?
Misdiagnosis of birth defect - damages?
Cost of care. Not emotional distress.
Failed sterilization leads to pregnancy - damages?
None.
Degree of care?
As exercised by reasonably prudent person in same circumstances. Objective test. No allowance for subjective ability.
Degree of care: Exceptions to reasonable person test
Superior skill / knowledge - reasonable person with that skill Physical characteristics - when relevant + expected to take reasonable precautions.
Children’s liability
0-4: no negligence 5-18: care of reasonable child of similar age, experience and intelligence under circumstances. EXC: Child engaged in adult activity
Professional liability
Exercise skill and knowledge normally possessed by other members of profession in good standing in similar communities.(empirical, not subjective) Conform!
Premises liability: undiscovered trespasser
No duty (unforeseeable victim)
Premises liability: Discovered/anticipated
“Known man-made death traps” (1) Artificial condition (2) highly dangerous (3) concealed (4) known to D
Premises liability: Licensees (no econ benefit to D)
“Known traps” (1) Concealed (2) known to D
Premises liability: Invitee (econ benefit or open to public)
“Reasonably known traps” (1) Concealed (2) Known or should have known
NY Standard on premises liability
Reasonable prudence in the circumstances - depends on type of entrant.
Premises liability: Police and firefighters
No recovery when risk is inherent to job.NY No limitation, except against employer or colleague
Child trespasser
Reasonable prudence re artificial conditions. Increases due to “attractive nuisance doctrine”.
Statutory standard of care
(Borrow criminal statute)Conditions: (1) P member of class that statute protects (2) Accident in class of risks that statute forbids NOT APPLICABLE: If compliance more dangerous than violationor impossible
Affirmative duty to act?
No. EXC:Pre-existing relationship D caused perilDuty: Reasonable, no heroics
Gratuitous rescuer
Liable for negligent damage!
NY Good Samaritan law applies for simple negligence; protects business from resuscitation by employees
Negligent infliction of emotional distress - 3 cases
(1) Near miss: D put P in danger zone + fear + physical manifestation of distress (2) Bystander to death or serious injury + close family member NY in zone of danger (3) Relationship - transactional (false positive HIV)
Breach - elements
(1) factual act/omission (ESSAY: “P will allege that breach was…”) (2) theory why below standard (“P will argue that act was unreasonable b/c…”)
Res ipsa - elements
(a) Accident of type normally associated with negligence (b) of person in D’s position [had control of process] (c) causation
Multiple defendants, merged causes - causation test?
“Substantial factor” (rather than “but for”). Each could have caused harm independently (but in reality merged and caused damage together).
Unascertainable cause (eg. two quail hunters) - liability?
Burden of proof on defendants to show which is liable. If unsuccessful - both are liable.
Proximate cause in “direct cause case”
Foreseeability. Not freakish/bizarre results even when immediate.
“Indirect cause cases” - 4 examples of liability
- Intervening: medical malpractice 2. Intervening: negligent rescue 3. Intervening: protection/reaction forces (eg. stampede)4. Subsequent disease/accidentLook for: connection btwn breach and damage.
