Negligence Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

What is the 3-stage test for negligence?

A

Did D owe C a duty of care? / Was this duty breached? / Did the breach cause damage to C?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must be proved first in negligence?

A

That the D owes the C a duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case established the test for duty of care and what principle?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson – the neighbour principle: you owe a DOC to anyone who you ought to have considered as being affected by your act or omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How was the neighbour principle updated and in what case?

A

Robinson v CCWY – if there is a clear and obvious relationship between C and D then it will be fair, just, and reasonable to establish a DOC by analogy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do you apply the Robinson test in obvious cases?

A

There is a clear and obvious relationship between C and D as… e.g. doctor/ patient, student/ teacher etc. Therefore, it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a DOC on D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must be proved in Stage 2?

A

The D must have breached the duty of care to the C.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the test for breach and what case defined it?

A

This is an objective test. Alderson B in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks defined a breach as “Doing something a reasonable man wouldn’t do or not doing something a reasonable man would do”. This shows negligence can occur through an act or omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does this test essentially mean?

A

The D will be in breach if they did not act reasonably.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What should be considered first in breach of duty?

A

What characteristic you need to apply to the D in your question (this will then be the standard by which to judge whether they acted reasonably).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is a D judged if they are an expert or possess a particular skill?

A

Judged by the standards of other reasonably competent professionals – Bolam / Bolitho (e.g. doctor / mechanic / builder).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the side rule for expert situations?

A

If the C consents to the risk (e.g. hospital procedure), then the D will not necessarily be in breach if the risk arises, unless they are reckless – Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is a learner/inexperienced D judged?

A

Judged by the standards of someone experienced and competent (compared with a person of average skill) – Nettleship v Weston.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How are children judged?

A

Judged by the standards of a reasonable child of a similar age – Mullins v Richards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is a D judged if they fall into no special category?

A

Judged to the standard of the reasonable man performing the same task – Vaughan v Menlove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the purpose of risk factors in breach of duty?

A

Risk factors can raise or lower the standard of care required of the reasonable person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the first risk factor and what case supports it?

A

Probability of harm – More care is needed if there is a higher probability of harm. Reasonable man must take precautions against bigger risks – Bolton v Stone.

17
Q

What is the second risk factor and what case supports it?

A

Seriousness / Magnitude of the risk – Bigger risk of serious injury = more care needed – Paris v Stepney Council.

18
Q

What is the third risk factor and what case supports it?

A

Cost and Practicality of Precautions – If the cost of taking precautions is too great, D may not be in breach – Latimer.

19
Q

What is the side rule regarding social utility of risk?

A

Some risks have benefits for society (social utility), so there is no breach – Watt v Hertfordshire Council.

20
Q

What must be proved in Stage 3?

A

That the breach of duty has caused the damage to the C (causation).

21
Q

What is the first type of causation and its test?

A

Factual causation – “but for” test: But for the D’s actions/omissions, would the damage have occurred? – Barnett v Chelsea Hospital.

22
Q

What is the second type of causation?

A

Legal causation – remoteness of damage: Was the damage to C reasonably foreseeable, or too remote? – Wagon Mound No 1.

23
Q

What is the side rule from Hughes v Lord Advocate?

A

D need not predict the precise way in which injury was caused, as long as injury of the same type was foreseeable.

24
Q

What is the Thin Skull Rule and supporting cases?

A

Defendant must take his victim as he finds him, and the chain of causation will not be broken – Robinson v Post Office / Smith v Leech Brain Co.