Negligence: Standard of Care Flashcards
(20 cards)
Standard of care
Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances (objective standard)
People with mental and emotional characteristics
held to the same standard as everyone else
People with physical characteristics
Modified standard: taken into account; compared to a reasonably prudent person with like characteristics
Intoxication
held to the same standard as sober people unless intoxication was involuntary
Children
modified standard: reasonable child of similar age, intelligence, and experience
Exception: children engaged in high risk adult activities are held to the objective standard for adults
Common carriers and innkeepers
Traditional rule: highest duty of care
Now: common carriers still higher standard, but now innkeepers are held to the ordinary negligence standard
Automobile and drivers
General duty of reasonable care for guests and friends in a car
Bailment
A bailee temporarily takes possession of another’s property (ex. driver leaves car w/ valet)
Bailors and Bailees standard
Common law:
- bailor must warn a gratuitous bailee of known dangerous conditions
- if the bailor receives the sole benefit, then the bailee has a lesser duty
- if the bailee receives a benefit, then he has a higher duty of care
Emergency situations
is that of a reasonable person under the same circumstances
Invitees
Land possessor owes a duty of reasonable care to inspect the property, discover unreasonably dangerous conditions, and take reasonable steps to protect the invitee
What is an invitee
someone who comes onto the land w/ a material or economic purpose
- public invitee: the land is held open to public
- business visitor: for a purpose connected to business dealings w/ the possessor of the land
Licensees
land possessor has a duty to either make the property reasonably safe or warn licensees of hidden dangers
What is a licensee
enters the land w/ express or implied permission
What is a trespasser
someone on the land w/o consent or privilege
There is no duty to?
trespassers (undiscovered ones)
but should refrain from willful, wanton, intentional, or reckless misconduct (ex. spring gun)
Discovered or anticipated trespassers
duty to warn or protect from hidden dangers
Attractive nuisance doctrine
May be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if:
- an artificial condition exists in a place where the owner knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass
- the land possessor knows or has reason to know that the AC poses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm
- the children do not discover or cant appreciate the danger
- the utility of maintaining the condition is slight compared to the risk of injury and
- the land possessor fails to exercise reasonable care
Landlord
landlor must:
- maintain safe common areas
- warn of hidden dangers
- repair hazardous conditions
Off premise victim
generally land possessor is not liable for injuries resulting from natural conditions but if it is artificial, they must prevent unreasonable risk of harm to persons not on premises