Negotiable Instruments Flashcards
a note is
a two party instrument in which one party, the maker, promises to pay the payee (the second party) a sum of money
Is a writing that simply recognizes a debt a note?
No. Note must promise to pay; merely recognizing a debt is not enough
a draft is
a three party instrument in which one party, the drawer, orders a second party, the drawee, to pay a sum of money to a third party, the payee.
Is a draft a promise to pay?
No. It is an order to pay.
A cashier’s check is
when the drawer and the drawee are the same bank
a teller’s check is
when the drawer and drawee are two different banks
To be negotiable, an instrument must
- be a signed writing,
- contain an unconditional promise or order,
- pay a fixed amount of money
- be payable to order or to bearer
- be payable on demand or at a definite time
the signed writing element of a negotiable intsrument
the signature can be made manually, mechanically, or by any use of a name mark or symbol
Who is liable when the signature on the instrument is a forgery?
it constitutes the signature of the forger as though he signed in his own name
If a promise or order contains a statement, required by law, that the rights of a holder or transferee are subject to claims or defenses that the issuer could assert against the original payee:
such statement does not make the promise or order conditional
NOTE: In this case, however, there can be NO holder in due course.
can a negotiable instrument be for payment of anything other than money?
No. The instrument must be payable in money, and only money, and the amount due must be ascertainable from the instrument.
An instrument is payable to order if:
it identifies a person
If an instrument is made payable to two or more persons jointly
need both people to sign it for it to be negotiable
An instrument that is payable only upon the happening of an event:
only negotiable IF the happening of the event is certain and the date is also certain (so, 90 days after Christmas 2016 is fine, but 90 days after my death is not ok)
May an instrument place a charge on the bearer?
No. With three exceptions:
- an undertaking or power to maintain or protect collateral to secure payment
- an authorization or power to confess judgment
- a promise or provision waiving any law intended to protect the obligee.
If a transferor purports to transfer less than the entire instrument, negotiation of the instrument does not occur. The transferee
there obtains only the rights of a partial assignee
a blank endorsement
is simply the signature of the transferor written on the back of the instrument (no mention of to whom the thing is being transferred)
Thus, the instrument becomes bearer paper
a special endorcement
the signature of the transferor that also names the transferee and directs payment to him
When an order instrument is transferred by delivery without an endorcement
(forgot to sign) the transferee has a specifically enforceable right to the unqualified endorsement of the transferor, but there’s generally no negotiation until then (can get injunctive relief)
An anomalous endorsement is
one made by a person other than the holder; such an endorsement is extraneous to the chain of title, and it has no effect on the manner in which the instrument must be negotiated (e.g., rich uncle lou doesn’t have to sign the back to endorse it)
An endorsement limiting payment to a particular person or otherwise prohibiting further transfer or negotiation of the instrument
will not prevent further transfer or negotiation of the instrument
When the name stated on the instrument is different from the name of the holder, he may indorse the instrument either as his name is stated on the instrument or as it really is.
both names may be required by the person paying, or taking the instrument for value or collection
If a minor or other incapacitated person negotiates an instrument, it is effective to transfer the instrument notwithstanding the incapacity. The minor may still rescind in an appropriate case, but:
cannot rescind as to a subsequent holder in due course
If the person identified as the payee is not intended to have any interest in the instrument, or is a fictitious person
an endorsement of an instrument by any person in the name of the payee is effective as the endorsement of the payee in favor of the person who in good faith pays the instrument or takes it for value for collection
EXAMPLE: An employee regularly draws a check payable to “John Smith or order,” representing to his employer that a business debt is owed to Smith. The employee then “forges” the name of John Smith as an indorsement and transfers the check to X. If the regular rules of forged indorsements applied, X would not be a holder in due course because a necessary indorsement was forged. However, under § 3-404(b), the indorsement is effective even though it was forged.
EXAMPLE: Assume that the employee who wants to cheat his employer makes up the checks but does not have the authority to sign them; instead, he has to have the employer (or another employee) actually sign. In such a case, even if the one actually signing has the intent that the named payee take an interest in the instrument, anyone can indorse [§ 3-405].