Neurobiology of Memory and Classic Cases Flashcards
(36 cards)
Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968)
- Proposed information flows through sensory form, into short-term storage and then short-term memory
- Sensory information is subject to decay (disappear if due to lack of attention)
- Storgae of sensory information is only possible through attention and then stored in short-term storage
- Information is pushed out of short-term storage by more information or rehearsed and retained in long-term storage
- Long-term storage is lost due to interference - confuse information with other information
Warrington and Shallice (1969) - Patient K.F
- Brain damage demonstrated certain incompatibilities with Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) model
- K.F had a digit span of 2 (normal is 6-8 items)
- Difficulty in short-term storage but was able to remember long-term information
- Had normal learning abilities
- The idea of flow from short-term storage to long-term storage is incompatible with K.F
H.M patient overview
- Epiletic who had left and right medial temporal lobes removed: bilateral medial temporal lobectomy
- His seizures were dramatically reduced but so was his long-term memory
- Experienced both mild retrograde amnesia and severe anterograde amnesia
- While H.M was unable to form most types of new long-term memories (LTM), his short-term memory (STM) was intact and also had procedural memory.
Retrograde amnesia
- Unable to remember the past (before H.M surgery)
Anterograde amnesia
- Unable to form new memories
Assessing H.M - Short Term Memory
- Digit Span
- If he was asked to read a series of number, he could repeat them back in order, providing that the time between them being read to him and him having to repeat them back was within a duration of short-term memory (immediate essentially)
- H.M. could repeat digit provided time between learning and recall is within the duration of STM i.e. Immediate recall
- Block-tapping memory-span test
- Demonstrated H.M STM fucntion was good for spatial information - with immediate recall
- Short-term/working memory okay for both verbal and visual spatial information
Assessing H.M - Long Term Memory
- Digit Span: does not benefit from repeated testing
- Block-tapping memory-span test: does not benefit from repeating testing
- Suggesting amnesia is global, not limited to one sensory modality when it comes to LTM
Evidence of new learning - H.M patient tasks
- Mirror tracing
- Rotary pursuit
- Incomplete pictures
Evidence of new learning H.M - Mirror Tracing
- Required to trace between two lines, an outline of an image. Difficult to do when you can’t see what you’re drawing or where your pencil is, except through feedback from a meter
- H.M. was able to do this task with some effort and then showed improvement after a number of trials
- When H.M. came back and was tested again and again, he wasn’t starting at baseline. He had learned and was producing less errors and took less time than he had the first time, performance improved over the course of the day.
- So he was performing and learning this new skill normaly, so retained that learning.
Evidence of new learning H.M - Pursuit rotor task
- You have to keep a stylus on a rotating target.
- He could also do that and improved over a learning trial period
- HM cerebellum was not damaged by the operation that might be of importance.
Evidence of new learning H.M - Incomplete pictures task
- Shown a series of images that are in a degraded form. So they’re just basic outline shapes that you didn’t really know what this is.
- Then you’re showing them again and again until a point at which you can identify them and then for those that you’ve been unable to identify your shown more until you can’t identify them.
- Then people are showing them again and can identify them at a lesser stage because they’ve been exposed to them before
- He’s making a number of errors when seen in the degraded forms and less errors when he’s being shown the fuller forms and then when he is retested he’s making fewer errors on the very degraded form, so he’s making more identification and then fewer errors and the second most degraded forms and so on.
Scientific contributions of H.M.’s case
- Medial temporal lobes are involved in memory
- STM and LTM are distinctly separate - H.M. Is unable to move memories from STM and LTM, a problem with memory consolidation
- Double dissociation with K.F.
- Memory may exist but not be recalled - as when H.M. exhibits a skill he does not know he has learned (dissociation between explicit and implicit memory
Episodic and semantic Memory
- Unlike episodic memory, semantic memory does not involve conscious recollection of the past
- Extent of amnesia effects on each is different
- Episodic memory generally suffers more greatly (e.g., Spiers et al., 2001; Tulving, 2002; Vargha-Khadem et al., 1997)
- But some patients show more specifically semantic memory deficits (e.g., Yasuda et al., 1997)
- Different involvement of brain areas during encoding and retrieval (Wheeler et al., 1997)
Autobiographical Memory
- A double dissociation between impairments of personal and semantic memory has been observed (Dalla Barba et al., 1990; De Renzi et al., 1987; Hodges & McCarthy, 1993)
- Neuroimaging data suggest that:
- Visual imagery and emotion centres in the brain, as well as frontal areas involved in self-referential processing, are important for autobiographical memories (Cabeza et al., 2004; Conway et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 2005)
Amnesia: A Modal Model
- Baddeley (see 2001) summarised a ‘modal model’ that accounted for most of the findings:
- Episodic memory learning involves associating items with their context using ‘mnemonic glue’ to tie episodes to context
- Recall and recognition involve the same underlying storage processes
- Semantic memory built from episodic memory
A Problem for the Modal Model of Amnesia?
The case of Jon
- Developmental amnesia due to premature birth and anoxia (deprived of oxygen), which resulted in specific, severe hippocampal damage
- Memory problems appeared obvious from age 5
- However, above average intelligence, good semantic memory
- Impaired recall, but largely intact recognition
- Does not retain or experience episodic memories and the idea that these episodic memories accumulate to create a semantic representation that just doesn’t seem to account for John.
- With double dissociations and the different temporal gradients, it seem to be evidence for dissociable, episodic and semantic systems within long-term memory
- Jon highlights is the importance of the hippocampus in episodic memory
Effects of Cerebral Ischemia on the Hippocampus and Memory
- R.B patient is a consequence of an operation that went wrong. He had cerebral ischemia (his brain wasn’t supplied with blood, which damages cells).
- R.B. suffered damage to just one part of the hippocampus (CA1 pyramidal cell layer) and developed amnesia
- R.B.’s case suggests that hippocampal damage alone can produce amnesia
- H.M.’s damage – and amnesia – was more severe than R.B.’s
Amnesia after Concussion: Evidence for Consolidation
- Posttraumatic amnesia
- Concussions may cause retrograde amnesia for the period before the blow and some anterograde amnesia after
- The same is seen with comas, with the severity of the amnesia correlated with the duration of the coma
- Period of anterograde amnesia suggests a temporary failure of memory consolidation
Gradients of Retrograde Amnesia and Memory Consolidation
- Concussions disrupt consolation (storage) of recent memories
- Hebb’s theory - memories are stored in the short term by neural activity
- Interference with this activity prevents memory consolidation. Examples:
- Blows to the head (i.e., concussion)
- ECS (electroconvulsive shock)
- A blow to the head produces coma
- When victim regains consciousness there is a period of confusion
- When confusion ends, the victim has retrograde emnesia for events that occured before blow and anterograde amnesia for events that occured during confusion
The Hippocampus and Consolidation
- Proposal that the hippocampus stores memories temporarily (standard consolidation theory)
- Consistent with the temporally graded retrograde amnesia seen in experimental animals with temporal lobe lesions
- Or, perhaps the hippocampus is involved in establishing memories, but they become “stronger” and less dependent on hippocampus over time
Neuroanatomy of Object-Recognition Memory
- Early animal models of amnesia involved implicit memory i.e recognition memory and assumed the hippocampus was key
- 1970s – monkeys with bilateral medial temporal lobectomies show LTM deficits in explicit memory, the delayed nonmatching-to-sample test
- Like H.M., performance was normal when memory needed to be held for only a few seconds (within the duration of STM)
Delayed non-matching-to-sample test for monkeys
- Monkey is presented with an object and underneath the object is food and after a delay/ distraction
- The monkey then has two objects, one of which it saw before with food underneath it, and then also an unfamiliar one and in order to get a food reward, it has to recognize that it’s seen an object before and not use that object.
- But instead, look to the unfamiliar object in order to get food.
- In monkeys that didn’t have these bilateral medial temporal lobectomies, they can learn this task quite quickly. And in fact, when they were given lobectomies, they could perform this task initially as well. So when there was only a very brief interlude and no destruction than monkeys could do the task.
- But if you put in delays or even just a minute or so, if you had the distraction, then the demonstrated impairments (couldn’t go for unfamiliar object)
Object-Recognition Deficits and Medial Temporal Lobectomy
- Neuroanatomical basis of resulting deficits:
- Bilateral removal of the rhinal cortex consistently results in object-recognition deficits
- Bilateral removal of the hippocampus produces no or moderate effects on object recognition
- Bilateral removal of the amygdala has no effect on object recognition
- An explicit memory is being tapped and affected by surgery to the medial temporal cortex
Hippocampus and Memory for Spatial Location (Morris water maze)
- Rats placed in pool filled with milky water
- Hidden platform that allows the rats to escape
- Healthy rates learn quickly where the platform is and swim directly to it, and are faster at learning on similar tasks
- Rats with hippocampal lesions never learn where the platform is and show no benefit on similar tasks