New Communication Technologies Flashcards
(38 cards)
What is media convergence?
“The Internet is the most powerful medium every created, because it can imitate all other media and they cannot imitate it.”
What does the Telecommunications Act of 1996 affect?
i. Telephone companies ii. Direct-to-home services Satellite tv iii. Wireless cable iv. Digital tv v. Interactive and other video services vi. Ownership and cross ownership rules vii. Broadcast license renewal
Why was Reno v. ACLU (1997) important?
i. Once sexually explicit material is posted, it’s available everywhere in the world ii. The internet is a “vast democartic fora.” iii. No intrusion, so FCC v. Pacifica doesn’t apply iv. Also distinguished 1. Ginsburg v. New York 2. Renton v. Playtime Theaters v. The CDA is a content-based regulation, so vagueness is important vi. O’Connor: CDA is unconstitutional, but Congress could create “adult zones” on the Internet
How has the Supreme Court interacted with New Communication Technologies (the Internet)
i. CDA 1996 indecent material restricted, Reno v. ACLU (1997): Unconstitutional ii. CPPA 1996 images of kiddie porn restricted, Ashcroft v. Free speech coalition (2002): Unconstitutional iii. COPA (1998) harmful material from commercial providers restricted, Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), Unconstitutional, remanded. iv. CIPA 2002 public computers mut be filtered US v. American Library Association (2003), constitutional v. COPA 2004, harmful material for commercial providers restricted Ashcroft v. ACLU II (2004), law likely unconstitutional; remanded for more info on filtering software vi. PROTECT 2003, advertising of kiddie porn is illegal, US v. Williams (2008), constitutional
What are some issues with the internet and privacy?
i. Inappropriate use of the Internet ii. Privacy iii. Spam
What is the Traditional Rule in regards to privacy?
If it occurs in public, it cannot be private.
What did FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler say about the internet? What did he propose?
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says the Internet must be regulated and proposes rules for net neutrality.
What did Branzburg v. Hayes do for privacy? But….. And….
Newsgathering is protected But… i. Journalists don’t have rights other citizens don’t also have ii. Journalists have no rights to interview prisoners Pell v. Procunier iii. Nor do they have any rights to access to jails or prisons Saxbe v. Washington Post, Houchins v. KQED And… i. Access to military bases and battlefields has been limited by the Supreme Court ii. Trespassing laws apply to journalists just as they do to non-journalists iii. Law-enforcement officers cannot give journalists special access rights
What are restrictions on the government?
- If journalists have info that they receive but have no broken law to get info, once they publish they can’t be punished by government for the publication 2. Can still be sued for libel or invasion of privacy, but not by government 3. Landmark Communications v. Virginia a. Once the press has information, it can publish without fear of punishment. 4. Howard v. Des Moines Register a. The press cannot be punished for publishing the name of a rape victim 5. California passes a new anti-paparazzi law in 2010
What are some examples of the repercussions for silence?
i. John C. Wilson criticizes the Bush Administration ii. Robert Novak identifies Wilson’s wife – Valerie Plame – as a CIA agent iii. Judith Miller of the NY Times and Matthew Cooper of Time magazine receive info on Plame iv. Miller and Cooper refuse to identify their sources v. Novak discusses his testimony vi. Miller and Cooper are held in contempt of court vii. The Supreme Court denies cert. viii. Miller still won’t talk and is sent to jail. ix. Cooper’s source gives him permission to talk. x. Karl Rove is source. xi. Pierre Thomas – Justice Reporter for ABC, previously CBS 1. One of several journalists involved in case with Wen Ho Lee 2. Wen Ho Lee sues the federal government for privacy invasion a. Reporters said he was a leader of espionage 3. Five reporters refuse to reveal their sources and are held in contempt of court 4. The case is appealed 5. Five major news organizations pay $750,000 to settle. 6. Jane Kirtley: “blood money.” xii. Toni Locy wrote a series of articles on the government’s investigation of Army scientist Steven Hatfill related to 2001 anthrax attacks 1. She refused to name her sources and was fined $5,000 a day until she did (she was ordered to pay the fines herself) 2. Order vacated when Hatfill settled with the Justice Department
What is a pro and con argument for the protection of the press?
- Pro. The press is the eyes and ears of the public and must be free to gather info in order to inform public 2. Con. The press has right to gather news and keep sources confidential but must give up info essential to protect the rights of others
What did the WDBJ fine for $325,000 worth of indecency?
WDBJ fined for broadcasting about 3 seconds of explicit material visible on some tv sets
What happened in Branzburg v. Hayes?
a. Do journalists have a First Amend. Right to withhold the identities of news sources from grand juries or other enforcement agencies? i. Pappas and Black Panther Party ii. Branzbug and drug trafficking iii. Caldwell writing stories about Black Panther Party called to testify, refused to go to grand jury iv. Justice White: No you do not have right to withhold, societal interests in law enforcement outweigh; but media harassment will not be tolderated v. Powell concurs: the holding is limited vi. Douglas: the right exists vii. Stewart: a privilege exists, a four-part test must be met by the government
What is the Stewart Test?
- The government can require testimony from a journalist only if: a. It can show probably cause that the journalist has info clearly relevant to a specific violation of the law b. It can show the info is available nowhere else c. It can demonstrate a compelling and overriding interest in the info.
What is the proposed Federal Shield Laws?
i. HR 985 Free Flow of Information Act 1. Any person who regularly gathers, prepares, writes, edits, reports or publishes
What is the Brown Test?
i. The privilege must yield: ii. When the information is not available from other sources and iii. When the one of the three additional criteria is met 1. The material is needed to prove an element of a criminal offense 2. The material is needed to prove a defense 3. The material is needed to mitigate the penalty iv. P.S. 1. Virginia’s privilege has been extended to civil actions 2. It has not been extended to non-confidential sources 3. There must be an agreement for Brown to apply 4. Example: TV Station in Blacksburg, Monday afternoon, assignment editor says we don’t have a lot going on today, let’s do a story about building on VT campus, you go out shoot some video and while you’re shooting, construction worker falls to his death and you have the whole video, back to station and talk to assignment editor, family has already been notified so you broadcast on evening news, dead man’s family sues construction for negligence, safety standards were not followed, in order to prove construction company was negligent, attorneys want copies of videos to prove for dead man’s family, material that was edited out too, we don’t have to turn it over, no agreement of confidentiality so you can’t claim that Brown extends 5. Nor is there a right to renege on promises made to confidential sources a. (Cohen v. Cowles Media)
ii. Under the Privacy Protection Act, law enforcement officers must seek subpoenas instead of search warrants unless:______________________
- There is probable cause to believe the person with the material has committed or is committing a crime OR a. There is a reason to believe immediate seizure of the material is necessary to prevent death or serious harm AND b. There is reason to believe the subpoena will cause the material to be destroyed OR c. The material is not supplied following the subpoena, other remedies have been exhausted, and further delay would threaten the interests of justice
What are all defendants guaranteed?
- A speedy trial 2. A public trial by 3. An impartial jury 4. Of the state and district where the crime occurred
What does Voir Dore mean?
Process for jurors to “speak the truth” and questioning of jurors as to what they may or may not know
Is it required for jurors to be ignorant of the facts and issues of a case?
“It is not required that jurors be totally ignorant of the facts and issues involved, and scarcely any of those best qualified to serve will not have formed some impression of opinion as to the merits of the case.” – Irwin v. Dowd (1961)
What is the constitutional conflict resolved?
- Rulings by the Supreme Court 2. Restrictions on the release of and publication of prejudicial information
The judge controls the courtroom. What does this mean he can do?
a. Change of venire or venue b. Postponement c. Rigorous voir dire d. Emphatic and clear instructions
What did Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976) decide?
i. Prior restraint is not allowed; but a court should consider: 1. The nature and extent of possible publicity 2. Possible alternative measures 3. The effectiveness of the gag order
What happened in Gannett v. DePasquale (July 2, 1969)?
i. Murder investigation, people put on trial ii. The 6th amendment public trial right belongs to the defendant 1. Gannett owned newspaper company that wanted to cover the trial 2. Three suspects called with murder 3. Granted a motion that closed the courtroom to press and public 4. Gannett argued that because defendant has right to public trial, the court could not close the courtroom a. Flawed argument