Non Fatal Offences Flashcards

(53 cards)

1
Q

Assault is defined in…

A

common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AR of assault

A

causing V to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gestures/actions can be an assault

A

Read v Coker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Spoken words or silence can be an assault

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Written words can be an assault

A

R v Constanza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negating an assault

A

Tuberville v Savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

V felt fear and apprehended force

A

DPP v Logdon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Immediate means in near future

A

Smith v CCoW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MR of assault

A

Recklessly or intentionally causing V to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Direct intention - aims to bring about prohibited consequence

A

R v Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Recklessness - realises risk but carries on regardless

A

R v Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Transferred malice

A

R v Latimer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Transferred malice doesn’t apply if crime changes

A

R v Pembleton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Coincidence

A

AR and MR must happen at same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AR before MR

A

Continuing acts - Fagan v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MR before AR

A

single transaction theory - R v Thabo Meli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Battery is defined in…

A

common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

AR of battery

A

to apply unlawful force onto another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

-only slightest touch is required
-clothes are an extension of a person

A

R v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

unlawful force = hostile

A

Wilson v Pringle - means unwanted and beyond ordinary jostlings of everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Force can be applied via a continuing act

A

Fagan v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Force can be applied indirectly (eg by an object)

23
Q

Force can be applied by an omission but only where D has duty to act and fails to do so

A

DPP v Santana-Bermudez

24
Q

MR of battery

A

Intention or recklessness to apply unlawful force onto another person

25
AR of ABH
Assault or battery which causes ABH to another person
26
3 elements to ABH
1. AR of assault or battery 2. V suffers an injury which counts as ABH 3. Assault/battery caused that injury
27
ABH means harm cannot be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant
R v Chan Fook
28
Psychiatric harm counts as ABH but emotions do not
R v Chan Fook
29
Cutting off a persons hair can be ABH
DPP v Smith
30
Even a short loss of consciousness can be ABH
T v DPP
31
What other injury’s can be ABH
bruising minor breaks minor fractures/sprains chipped teeth
32
Factual causation
But for test R v Pagett
33
Legal causation
Operative and substantial test R v Smith
34
When do intervening acts break chain of causation
When they are unreasonable and unforeseeable
35
Thin skull rule never breaks chain of causation
R v Blaue
36
MR of ABH
Same as MR of assault or battery
37
ABH - D doesn’t need to realise a risk or intend harm
R v Savage
38
Wounding found?
S20 and S18 OAPA 61
39
AR of wounding
to unlawfully wound a person
40
A wound is a cut or break in at least 2 layers of skin
JCC v Eisenhower
41
MR of S20 wounding (malicious wounding)
Direct intent or recklessness to cause SOME harm R v Mowatt
42
Oblique intention
R v Woolin
43
MR of S18 wounding (wounding with intent)
Direct or oblique intention to cause REALLY SERIOUS harm R v Belfon
44
Factors indicating intent
Prior threats Weapon Repeated/sustained attack Attack to critical area
45
GBH found?
S20 or S18 OAPA 61
46
AR of GBH
to unlawfully inflict/cause GBH on a person
47
GBH means really serious harm and injury’s do not have to be life threatening
DPP v Smith
48
GBH can be serious psychiatric harm
R v Burstow
49
GBH can be serious biological harm
R v Dica
50
GBH can be an accumulation of minor injuries
R v Brown and Stratton
51
Age and health are factors that can be considered when deciding if injuries are serious enough to be GBH
R v Bollom
52
GBH can be committed indirectly
R v Martin
53
MR of GBH
Same as wounding (S20 some and S18 really serious)