non-fatal offences- GBH Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

what are the 2 types of GBH

A

wounding and inflicting GBH
wounding and inflicting GBH with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

wounding and inflicting GBH section

A

s20 offences against the person act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

wounding and inflicting GBH with intent section

A

s18 offences against the person act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

actus reus of wounding and inflicting GBH

A

wounding
inflicting
grievous bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

mens rea of wounding and inflicting GBH

A

intention to cause someone harm
or
subjective recklessness to cause someone harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wounding definition

A

‘anything that cuts or breaks the continuality of the skin’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

case laws that define wounding

A

Moriarty v Brookes 1834
R v Wood 1830
JCC v Eisenhower 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Moriarty v Brookes 1834

A

A small cut below the eye IS a wound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Wood 1830

A

A broken collarbone which does not break
the skin IS NOT a wound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

JCC v Eisenhower 1983

A

Internal bleeding in the eye caused by
firing a pellet gun IS NOT a wound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

inflicting

A

usual rules of causation
factual cause (r v white)
legal cause (r v kimsey)
chain of causation (thin skull rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

grevious bodily harm cases to define

A

DPP v Smith
R v Saunders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DPP v Smith - w/ intent

A

'’really serious harm’’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Saunders

A

'’serious harm’’ that doesn’t need to be life threatening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what else should be considered

A

age and vulnerability of victim
numerous lesser injuries done together
passing a disease
psychiatric harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

age and vulnerability of victim case

A

R v Bollom (bruising a baby)

17
Q

numerous lesser injuries done together
case

A

R v Brown and Stratton

18
Q

passing a disease

A

R v Dica (HIV)

19
Q

psychiatric harm

A

R v Burstow (harrassment causing depression)

20
Q

mens rea- ‘maliciously’ meaning

A

intention to cause some harm or subjective recklessness to cause some harm

21
Q

cases to prove mens rea

A

R v Savage
R v Cunningham

22
Q

R v Savage

A

confirmed ‘maliciously’ meant ‘intention’ or ‘recklessness’

23
Q

R v Cunningham

A

confirmed the test for recklessness is subjective (some harm)

24
Q

wounding and inflicting gbh with intent sentence

A

max sentence is life
only can be seen in the crown court

25
actus reus of s18 offences against the person act
wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm
26
mens rea
intention to cause really serious harm or resist
27
case law for mens rea of s18
R v Taylor 2009 R v Nedrick and Woollin
28
R v Taylor
An intention to wound is not enough by itself. There must be an intention to cause really serious harm.
29
R v Nedrick and Woollin
Oblique intention is only available if the defendant foresaw really serious harm as a virtually certain consequence.
30
intention to resist arrest case
R v Morrison
31
wounding and inflicting GBH sentence and court
6 months or £5000 fine crown or magistrates