Non-infectious disorders (Raf) Flashcards
(135 cards)
ECG finding in PH?
RVH
(Also: right atrial enlargement, RV strain)
- ECG cannot be used to rule out PH because it will be normal in mild PH
Physical exam findings in pulmonary hypertension?
Failure to thrive, clubbing RV heave (which is actually in the left parasternal region), loud P2 (pulmonic component of second heart sound), holosystolic murmur of tricuspid regurg Hepatomegaly, high JVP Pedal or sacral edema RV gallop
What is the mechanism of injury in drowning?
Key point: surfactant dysfunction
- Majority of drownings are wet drowning (with direct aspiration of fluid), in contrast to dry drowning, where there is laryngospasm
- For individuals who are dead on arrival, distinction between salt and freshwater is relevant. Presumably, they have aspirated enough ~15 mL/kg to die and have the mechanism of fluid shifts and electrolyte changes be relevant. (In this context, fresh water drowning is worse than a salt water drowning
- For individuals who are NOT dead on arrival, the distinction is not very important. Both types of aspiration cause:
- Deactivation of surfactant—>decreased lung compliance—>VQ mismatch and shunting—>hypoxemia
- Other mechanisms for lung injury:
- Neurogenic pulmonary edema - due to CNS hypoxemia
- Post obstructive pulmonary edema
- Secondary infection
- Altered pulmonary capillary permeability
- Reactive pulmonary oedema
What are the features of failing fontan and why do these complications develop?
Two ways a fontan patient can “fail”:
- single ventricle failure
- preserved systolic/diastolic function
Fluid doesn’t drain effectively into the fontan circulation so back up venous pressure
Many of the complications of failing fontan are due to increased lymph production, which can’t be effectively drained due to increased venous pressure.
Increased venous pressure (which I think occurs because passive flow from systemic venous to pulmonary veins is decreased/backing up fluid)–>result in increased production of lymphatic fluid + thoracic duct can’t drain into the vein b/c the venous pressure is high. –>accumulation of lymphatic fluid in various organs and increased back pressure–>chylothorax, plastic bronchitis, lymphangiectasia (secondary cause), protein losing enteropathy.
Retrograde flow from thoracic duct to lung parenchyma–>plastic bronchitis
Hepatic congestion (I’m not sure if lymphatic are related)
types of bronchial cases and diseases they are associated with?
Cast = obstructive airway plug. Can get big enough to fill branching pattern of tracheobronchial tree
Type 1: cellular, inflammatory, contains fibrin + inflammatory cells (mainly eosinophils). Seen in asthma, CF, acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease
Type 2: acellular, non-inflammatory, contains mucin, fibrin, no inflammatory cells. this happens in Fontan patient, lymphatic abnormalities
Inheritance of PCD?
Autosomal recessive
Most common genetic defect for PCD?
ultrastructural defects are the most common (80% of patients).
Outer dynein arm defect is the most common. –this is a bit of simplified answer. Of the most common defects, 2 are outer dynein arm and 1 has normal ultrasturcutre,
What is the most comment genetic defect for PCD?
• DNAH5 - outer dynein arm
• DNAH11 - normal ultrastructure so TEM could be normal
• DNAI1 - outer dynein arm
Diseases due to sensory ciliopathy?
Polycystic kidney disease, Baredt-Biedl, Joubert, retinitis pigmentosa.
(It’s important to know these conditions since there isn’t a perfect separation between primary/sensory ciliopathies and PCD (which is a disorder of motile cilia). If seeing patients with these conditions, then keep the diagnosis of PCD at the back of your mind.
Recall that there 3 types of cilia: sensory, motile, nodal (embryonic)
Lung function abnormalities in pectus excavatum?
2/3 of patients have normal lung function with normal or low normal FVC/TLC
CPET and pectus excavatum?
- lower maximal stroke volume (O2 pulse)
- decreased VO2 max
- Decreased anaerobic threshold
- higher RR, lower tidal volume (I think they have some ventilatory limitation as well)
Effect of surgery for pectus excavatum on lung function and cardiac function?
- No clinically significant change in lung function. Studies have either very small improvements in EV1/FVC or no change or decrease
- That being said, there seems to be an improvement in exercise symptoms, which is due to improvements in cardiac function – improvements in stroke volume and VO2 max. Improvements in ECG abnormalities, which shows improvements in preoperative cardiac compression
How is severity of pectus excavatum measured?
The pectus severity index (PSI), also known as the Haller index → describes the depth of the pectus defect by comparing the ratio of the lateral diameter of the chest to the sternum-to-spine distance, at the point of maximal depression.
- The chest CT scan should be performed at full inspiration to maximize the intrathoracic dimensions and to provide standardization to permit comparison with subsequent scans.
- A normal chest has a PSI of ≤2.5.
- Among patients referred for surgery based on clinical criteria (ie, without consideration of CT scan results), all patients had a PSI of >3.25, whereas patients with PE who were not referred for surgery had PSI <3.25
- PSI>5 is associated with mild restriction
Indications for surgery pectus?
- exercise limitation
- poor self image
- above is from Kendig’s
- ideally late childhood, early adolescence
- Below if from uptodate, but the indications are not well standardized
As per uptodate, 2 or more of:
- PSI of >3.25 (measured on CT scan)
●Cardiac compression, displacement, mitral valve prolapse, murmurs, or conduction abnormalities
●Pulmonary function testing showing restrictive respiratory disease
●Failed previous repair of PE
(Cosmetic indiction can also be considerd)
CT findings of bronchiectasis?
- Elevated broncho-arterial ratio of >1-1.5, keeping in mind that normal ratio in children is about 0.8
- Lack of peripheral tapering of bronchi
- Tram track sign
- Signet ring sign
- Ancillary findings:
- Bronchial wall thickening
- Mucoid impaction
- Air trapping
CXR findings of bronchiectasis
- ring shadows (from appearance of bronchi end on)
- tram track opacities
- increase in bronchovascular markings
- air fluid level with cystic bronchiectasis
Advantages and disadvantages of low molecular weight heparin?
Advantage:
- long half life so not as frequent dosing, no need for close monitoring
Disadvantage:
- expense
- injection is required
- only partially reversible with vitamin K
- higher half life results in increased risk of bleeding
(I didn’t spend a long time verifying this answer from our study notes)
Advantages and disadvantages of warfarin?
Advantage:
- oral
- fully reversible with vitamin K
- once daily dosing
- low cost
Disadvantage:
- requires monitoring for INR
- narrow therapeutic window
- may interact with food and medication
- slow onset of action
What are the genetics for HHT?
Autosomal dominant, with variable penetrance
What are the clinical criteria for HHT? Are they reliable in children?
Curacoa criteria:
- Spontaneous and recurrent epistaxis
- First degree relative with HHT
- Mucocutaneous telangiectasia
- Visceral organ involvement: telangiectasia in GI tract or AVM in pulmonary, cerebral or hepatic
- 1 criteria: unlikely HHT
- 2 criteria: probable HHT
- 3 criteria: confirmed/definite HHT
These criteria are NOT very reliable in children, since most people don’t achieve a criteria diagnosis till age 40 years.
Criteria are helpful for ruling in, but not ruling out diagnosis.
(Technically you can make a diagnoses based on these criteria OR genetics)
What is the approach to genetic testing for first degree relatives with HHT? Eg. asymptomatic child of a parent/sibling with HHT.
This child has possible HHT (not based on Curacao, but just generally)
If the familial genetic mutation is known, then first degree relatives should be tested for that mutation. If the genetic mutation is not known, then first degree relative can be managed as if they have HHT with the same screening recommendations.
What are the genes implicated in HHT?
- ENG gene —>corresponds to HHT1
- ACVRL1 gene—>corresponds to HHT2
- SMAD4—>juvenile polyposis and HHT, so risk of GI malignancy
Screening Recommendations for HHT?
Seeing a new patient:
- clinical exam -look for orthodeoxia by assessing by supine and upright saturation
- investigate for anemia and iron deficiency (epistaxis)
Cerebral AVM: brain MRI at infancy and adulthood (eg. 18 years). No need to re-screen if these are negative.
Pulmonary AVM: screen with bubble echo at diagnosis and after puberty (makes sense to do before transition to adulthood since there can be growth of pulmonary AVM during teenage yearS). (BTS guideline actually does not recommend rescreening for adults) If echo positive then CT. (Of note, the BTS 2017 guideline prefers CT chest +/- contrast as the preferred screening test. There has to be very good local expertise to rely on bubble echo). (Of note, normal CXR, oxygen saturations and lack of symptoms is NOT enough to exclude a pulmonary AVM)
Hepatic AVM: no routine screening
If a patient has the SMAD4 mutation, then they should be referred to GI for polyposis and GI malignancy screening, with colonoscopy starting at 15-18 years.
How do you counsel patients with pulmonary AVM?
- Antibiotic prophylaxis for procedures with risk of bacteremia (since many cases of cerebral abscess happen in this context
- Intravenous access—>extra care to avoid intravenous air
- Avoidance of scuba diving
Unusual systemic disorders associated with pulmonary hypertension?
HHT, in particular hepatic AVM are associated with pulmonary hypertension
Sickle cell
CCHS