Non-Volitional "Natural" Interests in Land Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Nuisance

A

Use of property that UNREASONABLY INTERFERES with use and enjoyment of someone else’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distinguish Nuisance from Trespass

A

Nuisance: protects use and enjoyment; physical intrusion NOT REQ’D but may exist; harm to land REQ’D

Trespass: protects possession; REQ physical intrusion but NOT harm to land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Harm from Nuisance can be…

A

Visual
Auditory
Smell
Physical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Nuisance “State of Mind”

A
No evil defendant
Generally NO FAULT req'd to hold defendant liable
- No Negligence req'd
- No bad intent
- No knowledge req'd
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factors courts balance to determine Nuisance

5

A

1) Suitability of location of nuisance
2) Compliance with zoning laws
3) Priority
4) Social utility of activity
5) Cost to avoid harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nuisance:

Suitability of Location

A

How appropriate is the use given its location?

ex: refinery next to a school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nuisance:

Compliance with Zoning Laws

A

If in compliance, helps prove not a nuisance but NOT conclusive proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Nuisance:

Priority of Offending Activity

A

Who was there first?
Usually whoever was there first will win
- Right to farm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nuisance:

Social Utility of Activity

A

The higher the social value of the nuisance, the less likely it will be ordered to stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nuisance:

Cost of Avoiding Harm

A

Cost of plaintiff moving and cost of defendant abating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Remedies for Nuisance

A

Injunction or Money damages (past and future harm compensation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Support of Land

A

Lateral support

Subjacent support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lateral Support of Land

A

Support on the side
General Rule: STRICT LIABILITY
- no duty to take affirmative protective steps
- if remove natural support and replace with artificial support, duty to maintain arises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Subjacent Support of Land

A

Support underneath when sub-surface rights separated from surface rights
- mining but not drilling for oil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of Water

3

A

Surface Water
Water in watercourses
Groundwater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Surface Water

A

Free running water

  • water which does not have a well-defined channel
  • snow, rain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Retaining Surface Water

A

Governed by Rule of Capture

  • think of it like wild animals; if can catch it, you can keep it
  • usually not an issue; homeowners typically not concerned with catching water; more concerned with how to get rid of it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Getting Rid of Surface Water

A

Natural Servitude
Common Enemy Rule
Reasonable Use Rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Getting Rid of Surface Water:

Natural Servitude

A

Civil Law Rule/Natural Flow Rule
- natural right not to interfere with anything
- LO’s right: water to naturally flow away
- LO’s duty: permit water to flow away
No alteration of natural contour allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Getting Rid of Surface Water:

Common Enemy Rule

A
CL
LO can take steps to:
- remove water
- prevent water from coming onto land
- anything within reason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Getting Rid of Surface Water:

Reasonable Use Rule

A

ML

must be reasonable

22
Q

Getting Rid of Surface Water:

Which does TX follow?

A

Natural Servitude

23
Q

Water in Watercourses

A

Water which runs in a defined course

- rivers, streams

24
Q

Watercourse Systems

A

Riparian

Prior Appropriation System

25
Riparian Land
Land that is physically adjacent to the watercourse AND in the same watershed as the watercourse
26
If you own land physically adjacent to the watercourse that extends beyond the watershed divide, can you use the water from the watercourse on the part of land beyond the watershed divide?
No, cannot pipe the water over or use the water in any way on the land beyond the watershed
27
Rights of the Riparian
Absolute Rights | Correlative Rights
28
Absolute Rights of Riparian
No one can mess with these rights - Unlimited if no effect on flow (no restriction on use water) - Domestic use even if it affects flow (drink, cook, bathe)
29
Correlative Rights of Riparian
``` Non-domestic use CL: Natural flow - water as a source of energy ML: Reasonable use - balance needs of upstream and downstream) ```
30
Prior Appropriation System
Rights obtained by: - Prior use (CL) - Permits from gov't (ML)
31
Doctrines of Prior Appropriation System | 2
Colorado Doctrine | California Doctrine
32
Colorado Doctrine
Abolished all Riparian Rights
33
California Doctrine
Coexistence; riparian rights and prior appropriation coexist | TX follows
34
Public Rights in Water
Navigable | Tidal
35
Many courts would stop the use of the water beyond the watershed divide even if the lower riparian is not damaged. Why?
Afraid that if allowed to continue, the upper riparian would gain prescriptive rights to water if Plaintiff eventually became damaged
36
Changing size of Riparian Land Approaches | 2
Source of Title Unity of Title *use when Riparian land owner buys land adjacent to his current land
37
Changing size of Riparian Land Approaches: | Source of Title
Cannot enlarge Riparian land by purchasing adjoining tracts of land - once parcel of land no longer borders watercourse, it becomes non-riparian permanently - could lead to underutilization of resources
38
Changing size of Riparian Land Approaches: | Unity of Title
Adjoining tracts of land under common ownership becomes riparian - causes great uncertainty and fear in lower riparians
39
Groundwater | 2
Percolating water | Underground stream
40
Percolating Water
Water that filters down from the surface and goes into aquifers
41
Underground Stream
Water that flows within defined channel under the ground
42
Ownership of Percolating Water | 3
CL Rule American Rule Prior Appropriation
43
CL Rule of Owning Percolating Water
Absolute Ownership Rule English Rule Rule of Capture - can withdraw unlimited amount but cannot be malicious or wasteful - movement of water is "secret, occult, and concealed
44
American Rule of Owning Percolating Water
Reasonable Use Rule - off-land use usually unreasonable - key factor: will new rain/snow recharge aquifer to where it was before?
45
Prior Appropriation of Percolating Water
Amount able to take out in the past is the amount able to take out now
46
Oil and Gas Ownership while Still in the Ground
1) Not owned until extracted 2) Ownership in place (TX) 3) Owned by the gov't, not the surface owner
47
Oil and Gas Ownership: | Ownership in Place
Oil and gas could be lost if flows beneath another's land TX Land is more valuable under this approach so the gov't can receive more tax
48
Basic Process of Oil and Gas
``` Owner of land typically lacks financing Owner leases property to oil company (or grants easement with profit) - bonus - royalty Gov't regulates to prevent abuses ```
49
Bonus
Owner is paid to enter into lease with oil company (even if land ends up dry)
50
Royalty
Owner is paid percentage of what is produced by the oil company
51
Airspace and Sunlight
General rule: can own the space you can use and occupy | CL: owned land to the center of the Earth to the stars