NOTES Flashcards

1
Q

Adaptive Behavior

A

the effectiveness with which an individual meets the standards of personal independence and social responsibility expected for his/her age and cultural group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Flynn Effect

A

Impacts who is classified as having an Intellectual Disability and who gets services.
● I.Q. scores have been rising. (likely due to improved nutrition, health and education.)
● I.Q. test norms become obsolete.
● I.Q. tests are periodically re-normed, making them harder
● If an individual is tested on an older test, he/she will score higher.
● If an individual is tested on a re-normed test, he/she will score lower.
● Individuals with I.Q. scores in the Borderline and Extremely Low range have lost an average of 5.6 points when re-tested on a re-normed test and are more likely to be classified as having an Intellectual Disability when compared to peers re-tested on the same test.
● The Flynn Effect impacts who is classified as having an Intellectual Disability and who receives services: more people will be classified with an Intellectual Disability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impact of Flynn effect in 4 areas

A
  1. Special education placement and services
  2. Financial implications (social security services)
  3. Eligibility for military
  4. Death penalty (whether can apply)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

COMPONENTS OF AN EARLY CHILDHOOD EVALUATION

A

● Parent Interview/Social History
● Play Observation/Classroom Observation for Preschoolers
● Measure of Adaptive Behavior (i.e., Vineland Scales of Adaptive Behavior)
● Measure of Social/Emotional Functioning- (May use the Socialization Domain of the Vineland or the Social-Emotional Scale of the Bayley Scales. Over 2, may use the BASC-3 or the Child Behavior Checklist. All are based on parent interview.)
● For Preschooler: Separate Measure of Fine-motor/Visual-motor Integration (i.e., Beery)
● Measure of Cognitive and Motor Skills:
– 2.6+ -WPPSI-IV or 3+ Stanford Binet-IV
– 0-3.6 –Bayley Scales of Infant Development- Third Edition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WHY ARE YOUNG CHILDREN CHALLENGING TO ASSESS?

A

● Infants (particularly from 6 months old to 18 months/2 years old) are often distressed by unfamiliar adults.
● Toddlers and preschoolers may be very active, distractible, inattentive, or not interested in doing what you ask of them.
● Young children in general perform inconsistently, especially in unfamiliar situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FORMS OF ASSESSMENT

A
  1. Test administration 

  2. Behavioral observation 

  3. Interview of child 

  4. Interview of caregiver 

  5. Interview of teacher 

  6. Record review 

  7. Checklists/scales 

  8. Assessment of environment 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Norm Referenced

A

Norm referenced tests: Compare the individual’s performance to peers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Criterion Referenced

A

Criterion referenced tests: Assesses skills in terms of absolute mastery of content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Test-Retest Reliability

A

(consistency across time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inter-Rater Reliability

A

(consistency across raters or scorers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal Consistency Reliability or Alternate Form Reliability

A

(consistency across items)


How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FACTORS AFFECTING RELIABILITY

A
  1. Test length
  2. Time between tests (Test-Retest)
  3. Constriction or Extension of Range
  4. Guessing
  5. Variation within testing situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT (SEM)

A

The band of error which surrounds a test score

The higher the SEM, the less reliable the score→ inverse relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

VALIDITY

A
  • The extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure.
  • It is the most important consideration in test evaluation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Content Validity

A

Looks at how well the test samples the domain about which inferences are made.
● This is done judgmentally by examining:
○ The appropriateness of the item sample
○ The completeness of the item sample (different kinds of questions)
○ How the items are assessed (i.e., recall, recognition)
*Content validity is especially important in achievement testing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criterion-Related Validity

A

– Concurrent Validity
● Effectiveness in predicting criteria in the present. Example:
○ A mechanical aptitude test used to predict current job performance
– Predictive Validity
● Effectiveness in predicting a criteria in the future Example:
○ SAT scores used to predict grades in freshman year.
– Examines the relationship between the test score and some external measure.
– Specifically looks at how accurately a test score can be used to estimate a person’s score on a criterion measure

17
Q

Construct Validity

A

Extent to which a test may be said to measure a theoretical construct or trait (i.e., intelligence, neuroticism)

18
Q

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY

A

● In order to have validity, a test must be reliable.

● A test can be reliable, but not valid. No unreliable test can be valid.

19
Q

NORMS

A

● in norm-referenced assessment, an individual’s performance is evaluated in terms of the performance of people in the normative sample.
● Norm sample = a subset of the population assessed to estimate characteristics of the population.

20
Q

SCREENING
 VS. DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT

A

● Screening= Identifying children for whom further assessment is necessary (usually in multiple skills areas) ex. Beery

● Diagnostic = Pinpointing specific skill strengths and weaknesses (more dense in content and usually focused on a specific area) ex. Key math, woodcock reading mastery

21
Q

GRADE NORMS AND ACADEMIC TESTS

A

● Grade norms are always used with academic tests. Why?
● When reporting scores, you must give the grade-appropriate test. You cannot report scores, if there are no children in the norm group who are in the same grade as the testee.

22
Q

APPROACHES TO READING INSTRUCTION

A

● Phonemic or Phonics Approach: Major attention directed towards learning the sounds of vowels and consonants and blending them and to constructing phonemic families. Basal readers are used.

● Whole Language or Experiential Approach: Criticizes phonics approach as too mechanistic and not focused enough on meaning. Substitutes true speech (child’s own writing) for basal readers.

23
Q

SUBSKILLS OF READING

A
  1. Decoding/Phonics Skills: Includes letter-sound association, blending, and syllabication. Measured through finding words that begin or end with certain sounds, finding rhyming words, and reading non-meaningful words.
  2. Sight Vocabulary/Word Recognition: Looks at words that are memorized or rote. Measured through reading words in a list quickly.
  3. Comprehension Skills: Looks at understanding of written material and ability to use context to make meaning. Measured through literal, factual, and inferential questions after reading passages and/or through the cloze technique.
  4. Oral Reading Skills: Looks at accuracy and fluency (speed) of reading. Measured through child reading aloud. Errors such as mispronunciation, omission, repetition, and substitution of words as well as hesitation, attention to punctuation, and words read per minute are recorded.
24
Q

Dyslexia/Specific Reading Disability:

A

● Exhibits deficient decoding, but adequate listening comprehension. Associated with poor knowledge of sound-letter correspondence, inaccurate spelling, slow reading speed, inaccuracy in oral reading, but errors make sense semantically. Strong reliance on guessing from context when reading unfamiliar words. Reading comprehension may be adequate or may be compromised due to poor decoding.