NZBORA Flashcards

1
Q

Why are rights important

A
Inherent rights of person, their role
•fair and legitimate justice system
•crime control v Due process
•blackstones ratio
•beyond the court
•relationship between state and citizen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are human rights protected in NZ

A

• Universal declaration of human rights

NZ part of many international treating regarding human rights:
•HRA 1993
•PA 1993/2020
•NZBORA 1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BORA within the constitution

A
•Non-supreme law
• bora 1990 is entrenched law
• there is a breach of remedies which include:
-exclusion of evidence 
-reduction of sentence
-compensation
-others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Right to be presumed innocent

A
  • Adversarial criminal justice system and power imbalance
  • Woolminton v DPP 1935
  • s25 (c) of the BORA 1990
  • mens rea and actus reus
  • burden of proof and standard of proof
  • reasonable doubt
  • insanity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Other substantive rights BORA

A
  • s8 right not to be deprived of life
  • s9 right not to be subject to torture or cruel treatment
  • s14 right to freedom of expression
  • s18 freedom of movement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Procedural rights BORA

A

s21 right not to be subject to unreasonable search and seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Section 26 BORA

A
  • retroactive penalties (to be convicted,must be a law at the time of the offence
  • double jeopardy (cannot be convicted or punished twice)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Effect of Woolmington

4 steps

A

Step 1: prosecution = actus reus + men’s rea = beyond reasonable doubt

Step 2: defendant= raise reasonable doubt( burden to refute)

Step 3: defendants = raise evidence to suggest defence ( evidentiary burden)

Step 4: prosecution= prove defence not available ( beyond reasonable doubt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples illustrating the needs for human rights in criminal justice

A
  • police brutality
  • discrimination
  • prisoners justice
  • extrajudicial executions
  • arbitrary detention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Expectations regarding the onus of proof

A
  • explicit override by legislation
  • insanity
  • statute silent on mens rea
  • strict liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The right to freedom of movement

A
  • s18 of the BORA

* limitations in terms of statute and regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2 steps to whether a search and seizure was unreasonable

A
  1. Was there a search and seizure

2. Was the search or seizure unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does proof beyond reasonable doubt mean?

A
  • Defence does not have to prove innocence
  • Defence does not have to collaborate or participate in defence
  • Presumption of innocence gives rise to right to silence and right against self-incrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Beyond reasonable doubt v balance of probabilities

A
  • Criminal versus civil standard of proof
  • Beyond reasonable doubt = acquit if reasonable, genuine, realistic, doubt
  • Must be sure
  • Constraint on decision to prosecute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The right to not be deprived of life

A
  • section 8 of the BORA
  • Physician assisted dying ( seales v AG)
  • police action
  • death in state care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does proof beyond reasonable doubt mean?

A
  • Defence does not have to prove innocence
  • Defence does not have to collaborate or participate in defence
  • Presumption of innocence gives rise to right to silence and right against self-incrimination
17
Q

Beyond reasonable doubt v balance of probabilities

A
  • Criminal versus civil standard of proof
  • Beyond reasonable doubt = acquit if reasonable, genuine, realistic, doubt
  • Must be sure
  • Constraint on decision to prosecute