Obesity & body image in children & adolescents Flashcards

(60 cards)

1
Q

Adipose tissue

A
  • white “bad” fat
  • brown “good” fat- generates heat, insulation
  • fat- more around organs- takes years for it to gather on organs so overweight children not have on organs.
  • enlargement of heart (led to death).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Measuring adiposity

A

-hard to do

Gold Standards

  • cadaver (boil them).
  • hydrostatic weighing
  • dual energy x-ray adsorptiometry (expensive or need to be dead).
  • magnetic resonance
  • computerised tomography
  • tracer
  • -these are most expensive.

Pragmatic options

  • skinfold
  • BMI
  • bio-impedance
  • easier & cheaper
  • -getting more accurate overtime
  • -OK for approximations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BMI

A
  • an index of adiposity
  • Weight(kg)/Height(m^2)
  • fine for adults but still issues:

–BMI cut offs due to race. muscularity, frame size, fat distribution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Defining overweight & obesity in childhood by “analogy”

  • Cole et al 2000
  • Wang & Lobstein 2006
A

-unlike adults, no clear cut off points.

  • Cole et al 2000- longitudinal study- “resulting curves were avged to provide age & sex specific cut off points from 2-18 y/o”
  • look at ppl overtime to get a good judgement.
  • help describe where child is.
  • help hold weight more constant.
  • not trying get child lose weight.
  • just hold constant- don’t want dmg psych or physical of a child.

-Wang & Lobstein 2006- still say 50% North America & 38% EU children overweight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Body fat in childhood

-McCarthy et al 2006

A

-McCarthy et al 2006- changes with age differ for boys & girls, particularly during & after puberty.

  • boys wider before they get taller.
  • girls slowly gain fat & remain similar in adulthood.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Media headlines

-National Child Measurement Programme 2014/15

A
  • headline msgs that obesity in children is out of control- not actually true.
  • National Child Measurement Programme 2014/15- 1.1 million children weighed & measured by NHS staff in school.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Obesity- Age

-National Child Measurement Programme 2014/15

A

-National Child Measurement Programme 2014/15:
Age- in reception (4-5 years) & Year 6 (10-11 years)
-it has remained pretty constant in reception.

-1/3 overweight or obese before high school, which is bad however it has not increases a huge amount- it has always been a problem (last decade+).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Obesity- Social Deprivation

  • reception
  • year 6
  • Puhl & Brownell 2001
  • Goffman 1963
A

Reception- 13% children living most deprived areas were obese v 6% in least deprived.
Year 6- 26% children living most deprived obese v 11% not living least deprived areas.
-key find these areas to focus.
-food instability? cooking equipment? no freezer?
–tower block less physical activity v village green village.

  • diff b/w obese children attending schools in most & least deprived areas has increased overtime.
  • Reception: 2007-2017 4.5-6.8% &
  • Year 6: 2007-2017 8.5-15%
  • -getting bigger.
  • Puhl & Brownell 2001- social marginalisation & stigmatisation in obese adults- in healthcare. education, employment- therefore need combat it in children= cycle.
  • Goffman 1963- devalued social identity due to child stigmatisation- for being obese/overweight.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Obesity- Ethnic Group

  • Latner et al 2005
  • Thompson et al 1997
A

Ethnic Group- ethnic diffs of where ppl carry weight.
-link b/w black, urban, decreased wealth & obesity.

Reception: 6% Chinese & 15% Black obese.
Year 6: 20% Chinese & 30% Black.

  • Latner et al 2005- African American F more pos attitudes to obese peers v AA M & white M & F.
  • Thompson et al 1997- AA girls & boys v white picked heavier ideal body size for self.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Obesity: Location

A

Reception: 5% Kingston upon Thames v 14% Wolverhampton= obese.
Year 6: 11% Rutland v 29% Barking & Dagenham- obesity.
–link- urban more obese, rural less- link social adversity.
-availability of takeaways, safe places to cook etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Obesity: Parental Perception

  • Davidson & Birch 2004
  • Thelen & Cormier 1995
A

-tend think overweight child is normal- fathers more so than mothers.
Mothers: obese child 41% about right weight or too light. 59% said too heavy.
Fathers: 55% right/too light. 45% too heavy.
-parents not always aware- which is an issue.

  • Davison & Birch 2004- if parents emphasise importance thin shape/weight-child display neg stereotypes- obese parents are same. (fat child get less finical supp then thinner children).
  • Thelen & Cormier 1995- desire to be thinner correlated encouragement lose weight from both mother & father.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Physical consequences

  • short term
  • cardiovascular -Riley et al 2003
  • long-term
  • Hoffmanns et al 1998
A

Short term:
- asthma, chronic systematic inflammation, increased serum C reactive protein concentration.

Cardiovascular risk factors: high bp, abnormalities in left ventricular mass &/or function, abnormalities in endorthelial function, insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes. -Riley et al 2003.

Long term:

  • obesity persistence- most likely with 1 obese parent, obesity present at older ages.
  • cardiovascular risk factors- similar profile to that seen in childhood + myocardial infarcts (dead tissue)
  • -fat sitting on organs when obese for long time.

-Hoffmanns et al 1998- adult morbidity/mortality- BMI >25 at 18 years associated with increased mortality within 20 years of follow up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychological & behavioural correlates of child obesity

  • Puder & Munsch 2010
  • Puder& Munsch 2010
A
  • to help prevent & treat child obesity, we need to know which psychological or behavioural aspects to target.
  • unfortunately, most evidence is correlational.

-Puder & Munsch 2010- child obesity not stable condition- dynamic process- which behaviour, cognition & emotional regulation interact mutually with each other- with biological parameters as well as contextual factors e.g. parental attitudes & familial eating, activity & nutritional patterns.

  • New evidence- prevalence of food at early age, shapes what parents do.
  • child temperament & adult feedings behaviour
  • Puder & Munsch 2010- Clinical Groups: pos ass b/w obese weight status &:
  • 1- Family Factors (behavioural modelling) portion sizes, eating styles etc…
  • 2- Externalising Features: ADHD & impulsivity.
  • 3- Internalising Features: depress symps, anx, social withdrawal, emotion regulation probs.
  • -also evidence for inter-generational transmission of psychopathology & weight probs together.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychological consequences

  • Reilly et al 2003
  • Birch 2005
  • Cash 2004
  • Schwimmer et al 2003; William et al 2005
A
  • (in community-based cohort & cross-sectional studies).
  • Reilly et al 2003- in girls obesity ass with depress & low s-e- girls more neg impacted then boys however boys still effected.
  • Birch 2005- depress in 5-7 y/o girls- predicted subsequent dietary restraint.
  • Cash 2004- increased risk of ED, weight cycling & neg body image.
  • Schwimmer et al 2003; William et al 2005- obese children & adolescents report lower health-related quality of life.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A conceptual model of weight, body image & disordered eating attitudes in children.
-Evans, Tovee, Boothroyd & Drewett 2013
(see model in notes)

A

(bmi, thin-ideal internalisation, dietary restraint, disordered eating attitudes, depression, body dissatisfaction).

-dieting symps in children in those overweight & more depressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Obesity- Weight Stigma

  • Leeds 2013
  • Latner & Stunkard 2003
  • Cramer & Steinwert 1998
  • Musher-Eizenman et al 2003
A
  • Leeds 2013- 126 children read book with adult, 3 versions- main character either normal, wheelchair or fat- child rated fat as less favourable on athletic, academic, competence, s-e, social success & behaviours.
  • -stigma occurs early.
  • Latner & Stunkard 2003- stigmatisation not help- otherwise would be decrease in obesity over last 40 years.
  • Cramer & Steinwert 1998- overweight pre-schoolers- show stronger neg stereotypes v normal weight peers.
  • Musher-Eizenman et al 2003- 5 y/o wider range of acceptable body types v tee & adults.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Obesity- Peer Relationships

  • Hill & Silver 1995
  • Strauss & Pollack 2003
  • Anesbury & Tiggemann 2000
  • Richardson et al 1961
  • Latner & Stunkard 2003
A
  • Hill & Silver 1995- obese children stereotyped as unhealthy, academically unsuccessful, socially inept, unhygienic & lazy.
  • Strauss & Pollack 2003- obese teens listed as other teens’ “friend” less freq than non-obese teens.
  • Anesbury & Tiggemann 2000- extent of obesity stigma influenced by children’s controllability beliefs but changing controllability beliefs does not immediately reduce stereotyping.
  • -can’t just educate, it’s hard to shift.
  • Richardson et al 1961- 640 school children, 10-11 y/o- 6 pics, 4 disabilities, 1 normal, 1 fat- who want to be your friend= fat was lowest rated.
  • -Latner & Stunkard 2003- worse now- increase 40%+
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Obesity- Bullying

  • Fairburn et al 1998
  • Janssen et al 2004
  • Rand & Wright 2000
A

-overweight & obese teens more likely to be victim of bullying than non-overweight teens at any age.

  • Fairburn et al 1998- plausible teasing may lead to development of eating disturbances.
  • relational (e.g. withdrawing friendship) & overt (name calling) bullying common, but not sexual harassment.

BUT -Janssen et al 2004- obese also more likely to bully at 15-16 years old.

-Rand & Wright 2000- older adolescents rated larger sized figures more acceptable v younger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Factors that influence impact of obesity upon child psychological health.

  • National Obesity Observatory 2011.
  • (see diagram in notes)
A

-National Obesity Observatory 2011

Moderating Factors:

  • Age- older children experience more probs.
  • Gender- girls experience more probs.

Mediating Factors: for obesity causing psychological probs.

  • lack of physical activity, low s-e, body dissatisfaction, EDs & weight-based teasing.
  • -for psychological probs causing obesity: lack of energy to exercise, medication, family breakdown & poverty.
  • -also mediators (social, behavioural, biological & psychological factors)
  • –same as adults.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Obeso-genetic environment

-public health campaigns

A

-had to be normal weight in this enviro- fast food, bigger portions, computer games, more driving etc…

Public Health Campaigns- more stigmatised in America. -also mugshot esq.
-Change 4 Life (good) & Michelle Obama’s Let’s move campaign.

-shame of self= deceased motivation- can make it worse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Body image schemas & attitudes

A

Schema:
-central Organising Constructs in the interplay of cog, behavioural & emotional processes, in context of enviro events.

Attitudes:

  • i- Body Image Investment- cog-behavioural importance individuals place on appearance.
  • ii- Body Image Evaluations- pos-to-neg appraisals of & beliefs about one’s appearance…
  • -based on discrepancy b/w self-perceived characteristics & personally-valued appearance ideals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Cognitive Behavioural model of body image- Cash 2004.

see diagram in notes

A

-Cash- 2004

History (dev factors): cultural socialisation, interpersonal experiences, physical characteristics, personality attributes.

Current ( precipitating & maintaining): appearance schematic processing, activating events, internal dialogues, body image emotions, self-regulatory, adjustive behaviours.

all feed into= Body Image Schemas & Attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What’s body image” when it comes to children?

A
  • like their own bodies early.
  • body image investment?
  • body eval & satisfaction?
  • weight & shape concerns?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Developmental of body image

A
  • self percep & recog (0-2 y)
  • self-representation (4-5 y)
  • self-other comparison (5-7 y)
  • self-image & ideal-image (8+y)

-multiple representations of body, conscious & unconscious (late adolescence)= adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
developmental of body image: Self-Perception Recog
Self-Perception Recog -schemata develop from birth, synchronic imitation, mirror-self recog, use of personal pronouns, photo self-recog, pretend play. --pre 18 months- not recog it is them, 18 months+ they do (also trolley video with carpet).
26
developmental of body image: Self-Representation
Self-Representation - Object-Mediated: toys, tools, drawing, photos. - Perspective Taking: theory of mind. ---the meaning of "me": gender, physical characteristics, personality, preferences, role, clothing, family, friends, school etc...
27
developmental of body image: Assessing Children's Body Image | -Ricciardeli & McCabe 2002
- pick your ideal- girls tend to go 1 body size smaller- suggests slight pref for thinness. - this was down with computer generated bodies. - might also feel they have to pick one that was not their own. - Ricciardeli & McCabe 2002- Body Change Inventory- consists 3 subscales. - -1- Decrease Body Size. - -2- Increase Body Size. - -3- Increase Muscle Size. - -applicable to M & F. - --well developed scale.
28
developmental of body image: Social Comparison
Social Comparison -to do this you need.. stable idea of your own body shape, size, proportions, ability to hold this in mind AND think about another's shape, size etc... - -AND to compare these directionally, poss from point of view of observer. - -AND possibly an awareness & internalised image of socio-culturally-promoted thin-ideal. - very complex cognitive task. -it is almost impossible to access children's idea of body image- 7 y/o won't fully understand concepts of culture & society etc...
29
Children's body image in numbers- - Ricciardelli & McCabe 2011 - Smolak 2004 - Birch & Fisher 1998
-Ricciardelli & McCabe 2011- 50% girls & 30% boys aged 6-9 want to be thinner. - Smolak 2004- 40% preadolescent children report that they have tried to lose weight. - -not full blown diets, learn methods early due to adults doing it. -Birch & Fisher 1998- early dieting in long run ass with chronic body image probs, weight cycling etc..
30
The developmental course of body dissatisfaction - Tremblay, Lovsin, Zecevic & Lariviere 2011 - Davison, Markey & Birch 2000 - Murnen et al 2003 - Davison, Markey & Birch 2003 - Smolak 2004-
- Tremblay, Lovsin, Zecevic & Lariviere 2011- 4 y/o, articulate Weight Stigma. - Davison, Markey & Birch 2000- 5 y/o knows own Weight Status & report weight concerns. - Murnen et al 2003- 6 y/o awareness & Internalisation of thin ideal & muscular ideal. - Davison, Markey & Birch 2003- 9 y/o body dissatisfaction Linked to BMI. - Smolak 2004- 13 y/o body dissatisfaction as Common as in adults. - pref thin ideal, show images, Disney princesses, hyper muscular.
31
Physical characteristics - Stice 2002 - Smolak 2002
- social stigma, PE, less socially accepted= body dissatisfaction. - Stice 2002- overweight men & women are most vulnerable to body diss in adulthood & adolescence. - Smolak 2002- the same relationships gradually emerges during childhood, becoming stronger with age.
32
Cultural socialisation
- children like sponges. - dove improvements on range of beauties but still not any fat ppl. - parents need teach children to critically accept ads etc... - men's move to muscular.
33
Media consumption by age & modality - OFCOM Report 2016 - Flannery-Schroeder & Chrisler 1996 - Stice 1994 - Blowers et al 2003
- OFCOM Report 2016- look at mean hours media consumption. - -still increasing, more sedentary, media consumption= games, YouTube- not avg body- attractive, athletic etc... - Flannery-Schroeder & Chrisler 1996- family, friends & media- fat bad, thin good. - Stice 1994- media important transmitter of sociocultural ideals about body size & shape. - Blowers et al 2003- most child exposed media thin beauty ideal before formal schooling.
34
Cultural socialisation - a-d - c- Cash 2004 - d- Murnen et al 2003
- via socialisation, children learn about: - a- which physical characteristics are Valued. - b- their social Meaning: what possessing them (or not) implies about the owner's character, health & eating behaviour. - c- Strategies to attain these characteristics, such as dieting & exercise- Cash 2004. - d- implication that such standards are Attainable by all given sufficient effort - --Murnen et al 2003- body modification- makeup, nails, hair etc...
35
Interpersonal Experiences - Cramer & Steinwert 1998 - Musher-Eisenmann et al 2004 - Anesbury & Tiggemann 2000
- Cramer & Steinwert 1998- weight stigma: the "relative devaluation of an overweight figure size". - communicated by parents, teachers, doctors, peers & media. -Musher-Eisenmann et al 2004 -children think being overweight means: child is unpopular, suggests laziness & non-conformity is child's own fault - Anesbury & Tiggemann 2000- weight discrimination widespread. - -less likely to get a job. - -attribute symptoms to weight etc...
36
What are longer-term consequences of body dissatisfaction? - Field et al 2003; Stice & Bearman 2001 - Killen et al 1994
- Field et al 2003; Stice & Bearman 2001- - -EDs, depress, binge-eating, weight gain, rigid dietary restraint, disengagement with physical activity, decreased fruit & veg consumption. - --more true for girls but increase in boys, tend to gain more weight overtime. -Killen et al 1994- + many others- longitudinal study of adolescent F & adult F- body diss one of main RFs leading to problematic eating attitudes.
37
Pathways from early body image to later disordered eating? | -Sroufe 2009
- Sroufe 2009 -not guaranteed. - Alternative pathways may lead to the same common outcome (equi-finality). - Similar pathways may lead to diff outcomes (multi-finality).
38
Adolescence as "trigger point" for EDs | -Wichstrom 2000
-body image & eating schemata are in place prior to puberty- they shape the Context in which pubertal changes are experienced by the individual. - Schemata Strongly shape individual's reaction to major changes ass with puberty: weight gain (40lbs), increased autonomy, increased sexual objectification, loosened parental ties. - schemata continue to dev: depress &/or dieting pave way to disordered eating OR pos experiences mitigate risk. -Wichstrom 2000- by 12 y/o already have ED symps similar to those in late adolescences.
39
(lec 9) EDs & adolescent prob?
- historically, the physical & psychosexual changes of puberty- thought underpin ED dev, so studies & theories have focussed on adolescents. - idea was big in 1960s it was trigger- however now know it is not true.
40
2 key questions
what are diffs & similarities with adolescents & adult EDs? - large number of children will dev symps with potential turn into later clinical EDs, though most won't. - what can this tell us about the dev processes that typically underline adolescent/adult EDs?
41
Age distribution of ED diagnoses | -Nicholls et al 2011
Nicholls et al 2010- 3 in 100,000 children = 13 years dev clinical EDs. - most common in 12-13 y/o. - younger children less EDs. - not include avoidant/restrictive ED.
42
EDs in children | -van Son et al 2006
- serious cus disrupt normal physical & psychological growth & dev. - often missed by clinicians/parents particularly in young children. - -often think picky eater or autism etc... misdiagnoses. - van Son et al 2006- age at presentation in AN is decreasing. - longer child has harder is to recover from.
43
DSM-V ED diagnoses applied to children. | -Nicely et al 2014
- Avoidant & restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), AN & BN= most common in children. - BED, OSFED, Pica (non-food), rumination disorder (regurg), UFED- still occur but rare. ARFID- food phobia, disturbance in eating as evidenced by 1 or more of: - -substantial weight loss, nutritional deficient (vit c...), dependence feeding tube or dietary supplements, sig psychosocial interference, - -not due to unavailability of food, AN or BN & no disturbances in body shape/weight. - -not better explained by other medical condition. - -sometimes ASD, however ED well beyond "typical" issues with other disorders. - -shapes of food, diff foods can't touch each other, carbs tend to be safe, - -sometimes seen if premature birth: don't ass food with pos emotions- feeding tubes & oxyegen etc... - Nicely et al 2014- retrospectively reviewed charts patients 7-17 y/o seen in outpatient ED clinic b/w 2008-2012. - -ARFID found in younger ptcpts & proportionally there were more boys than compared to other EDs. - -AN, BN & OSFED- similar psych co-morbidities to each other & symps & features. - ---ARFID has diff with far higher Psych co-morbidities.
44
Challenges in diagnosis in children
- children may not experience their body weight, shape & size like adults. - younger child lack vocab for their illness: may not state that afraid of certain foods, getting fat, dislike their bodies. - even before vocab "catches up" actions still consistent with classic ED behaviour of food refusal, compensatory behaviours & resultant failure to grow as expected. - -can't express themselves. - -extra running on spot & usually socially accepted/encouraged.
45
ED children v adolescents: features compared - Peebles et al 2016 - Walsh & Sysko 2009
Peebles et al 2016- more males <13 years v older. - EDs less prevalent <13 -sig less BN- less freedom eat & don't have knowledge of laxatives etc. - might be a move to muscular ideal from <13 to 13-19 y/o. -Walsh & Sysko 2009- cognitions & behaviours may be full ED or sub-syndromal.
46
Treatment for EDs in children & adolescents. | -maudsley model of family therapy (FT-AN)
Maudsley Model of Family Therapy (FT-AN) - doesn't blame anyone, makes family part of treatment, empowers parents to combat early ED onset. - -increasing use in BN not just AN. - BN: FT-BN or CBT. - BED: nothing clear -not very common in children. - ARFID: still very new, but desensitization & CBT appear promising- works as a "phobia" - minimise time child stays in hospitals- focus instead on restoring physical stability. - use of day-treatment or/followed by outpatient treatment preferred.
47
Maudsley Family-Based Treatment | -steps 1-3
- deved at Maudsley hospital London. - intensive outpatient treatment. - for: children/adolescence, medically stable, ill for only relatively short time. - opposes view the parents/families are part of prob or cause of illness: instead parents are essential resource for recovery. 3 phases of treatment (15-20 sessions over 12 months) - 1- Weight Restoration: dangers malnutrition & low weight status- assessing family's typical interaction, eating patterns & meals -focus is on eating & weight gain. (bring a meal in). - 2- Returning Control Over Eating to Patient: once eating happens, child takes more control on what they eat & broader family issues are dealt with in therapy. - 3- Establishing Healthy Adolescent Identity: catch-up with what missed & give them confidence & independence back to them.
48
Family based therapy for EDs | -Couturier et al 2013
- Couturier et al 2013- effectiveness v individual therapy. - -Immediate Post-Treatment- no statistical significance that family was better than individual. - -6-12 Month Follow-Up- overtime family based is more sustainable.
49
Disordered eating attitudes
- weight & shape issues from age of 5. - exercise more common in children v purging. - food rituals & compulsions.
50
Disordered eating attitudes are dimensional not categorical.
- attitudes/behaviours exist along continuum of severity rather than "all or nothing" distribution. - the behaviours of children with clinical ED feats are at the extreme end of this distribution. - as in EDs are the extreme of disordered eating.
51
Disordered eating attitudes arise early in childhood. - Schur, Sanders & Steiner 2000 - Scunk & Birch 2004 Erickson & Gerstle 2007 -Damiano et al 2015 -Ricciardelli et al 2003- Gordon 2000-
- b/w 7-11 y/0, key concepts, behaviours & attitudes to food & body emerge: - Schur, Sanders & Steiner 2000- 8 y/o children an describe Weight Loss Strategies- bariatric surgery etc... - Scunk & Birch 2004- 9 y/o girls with higher BMI report higher dietary restraint. Erickson & Gerstle 2007- 10-20% pre-peri-pubertal children report clinically sig disordered eating attitudes. - Damiano et al 2015- 34% 5 y/o girls report moderate dietary restraint- attempted cog restraint. - Ricciardelli et al 2003- from age 8, boy desire muscles & large size then girls- utilize muscle gaining strats & perceive greater pressure to gain muscle size. Gordon 2000- disordered eating attitudes involve, in exaggerated form, behaviour that is normal in our culture & highly valued. --children like sponge- learn this early (weight/shape in magazines, TV- want to be part of it- emulate social ideals/norms.
52
Measures of childhood disordered eating attitudes - Wood et al 1996 - Mendelson et al 1996
- Wood et al 1996- Body Dissatisfaction Scale of ED Inventory (BD-EDI) - -questionnaire, used assess body image concerns- reliable & consistent with those 8 years+. - Mendelson et al 1996- Body-Esteem Scale- attitudes & feeling their body & appearance- good internal consistency & moderate test/re-test reliability. - Other questionnaires: Offer Self Image Questionnaire & Harter Scales- work both child & teen- good longitudinal.
53
what contributes to dev of disordered eating attitudes?- Gender - Smolak 2004 - Murnen et al 2003 - Truby & Paxton 2002 - Ricciardelli & McCabe 2011 - Fredrickson & Roberts 1997 - Clark & Tiggemann 2006 - Kraig & Keel 2001
Gender -Smolak 2004- girls have greater eating attitudes then boys aged 9. - Murnen et al 2003- girls report greater Pressures Towards Thinness from age 6. - Truby & Paxton 2002- girls id Thinner Ideal bodies than boys from age 7. - Ricciardelli & McCabe 2011- girls express Greater Body Dissatisfaction than boys age 7. - -this is very young. - girls are Differentially "acculturated to internalise an observer's perspective as a primary view of their physical states". - Fredrickson & Roberts 1997- internalise msgs that their body is a project to work on & be judged on. - Clark & Tiggemann 2006- men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at. - -this determines not only most relations b/w men & women but also the relation of women to themselves. -Kraig & Keel 2001- however found- no sex diffs in victimisation.
54
what contributes to dev of disordered eating attitudes Weight Status/BMI -NHS- Health & Social Care Information Centre -Stice 2002; Hudson et al 2007 -
- NHS- Health & Social Care Information Centre- looked at adiposity/weight- reception & year 6. - -larger children increased risk ED through body dissatisfaction. - being, or having been overweight increase other risk factors for disordered eating: -Stice 2002; Hudson et al 2007- body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalisation, perceived pressure to be thin, dieting, depress, weight stigma.
55
A conceptual model of disordered eating attitudes in children -Evans, Tovee, Boothroyd & Drewett 2013 (look at notes for diagram)
- Evans, Tovee, Boothroyd & Drewett 2013- help base framework in essay for exams. - -could be happening at same time, hard to disentangle (depress).
56
``` what contributes to dev of disordered eating attitudes- Psychological Variables -Jendrzyca & Warschburger 2016 -Nichols et al 2018 -Evans et al 2017 ```
- Jendrzyca & Warschburger 2016- experiences weight stigma aged 6-11 led restrained eating 1 year later in girls not boys; body dissatisfaction explained this link for girls but not boys. - Nichols et al 2018- internalisation of appearance ideals & perfectionism at 6 y/o predicted body dissatisfaction at 7 y/o for girls & boys= prediction overtime. - Evans et al 2017- dietary restraint at age 7 predicted disordered eating at ages 9-13, but body dissatisfaction did not. - -however body diss tended to happen at same time as dietary restraint- was not a warning symptom. -Body dissatisfaction appears to function best as longitudinal predictor of disordered eating after the age of 12 (roughly).
57
``` what contributes to dev of disordered eating attitudes- Parents -Abramovitz & Birch 2000 -Damiano et al 2015 -Allen et al 2014 -Collins 1991 ```
- Abramovitz & Birch 2000- 5 y/o daughters of dieting mothers had greater knowledge of & endorsement of dieting than girls of non-dieting mothers. - -modelling behaviour? - Damiano et al 2015- BUT no relationship b/w maternal dietary restraint & their 5 y/o daughter's dietary restraint - -just greater knowledge. - Allen et al 2014- children of mothers with current or past ED reported sig higher lvls of ED symps & emotional eating than other children - -shared enviro + hereditary. -Collins 1991- preschoolers body size rating correlated with their mother's rating of her own body.
58
What are the consequences of disordered eating attitudes? - key 3: - Keel et al 1997; Gardner et al 2000 - Stice & Bearman 2001 - Field et al 2003
- 1- predict subsequent disordered eating- Keel et al 1997; Gardner et al 2000. - 2- predict subsequent depress- Stice & Bearman 2001. - 3- may (counter-intuitively) predict weight gain- Field et al 2003.
59
Can we think of EDs as "developmental disorders"?
- emerges during developmental process, with diagnosis often coming at a predictable age/stage? - -AN~ 13 years; BN ~ 17 years. - manifests on a continuum of severity at least partially grounded in typical developmental process? - -Dimensional , Not Categorical Phenomena, "Normative" Discontents. - shows variations in incidence/prevalence for which biology cannot fully account? - -More Prevalent Amongst Young Females- No Simple Physiological Reason For This. - diagnosis of AN ~ 13 years, BN ~ 16 years therefore could partially as marked peaks of occurrence. - diff b/w F & M is not simple physiological reason- developing in social context for F.
60
Adolescence as "trigger point" for EDs, (second one) -Stice 2001 -Sands et al 1997
Schemata continue to dev: depress &/or dieting pave way to disordered eating- (Stice 2001) OR pos experiences mitigate risk. -Sands et al 1997- girls' disturbances of body image & eating- freq occur well before puberty.