observations Flashcards
(21 cards)
covert advantage
P = can be praised of Ron participant reactivity
E = this is because participants are unaware they are being observed and so will not change their behaviour
E = good because participants should show more natural behaviour which increases the validity of results
covert disadvantage
P = can be criticised for ethical issues
E = this is because participants have not been told they are being observed and therefore cannot be deceived and they have not been able to give consent
E = bad because they have to be fully informed about the nature of the study they are in and not be lied to
overt advantage
P = more ethically acceptable
E = participants have given their consent to be studies
E = good because they have the right to withdraw if they wish to
overt disadvantage
p = there could be demand characteristics
E = this is because participants have knowledge of being studied which influences behaviour
Ed = bad because it reduces the internal validity of findings
participant observation advantage
P = can be praised for providing in-depth in sight
E = this is because the researcher can experience the situation as the participants do, giving them increased knowledge of the lives of the people studied
E = good because it may increase validity of findings
participant observation disadvantage
P = criticised for loss of objectivity
E = this is because the researcher may come to identify too strongly with those they are studying 9 going native)
E = bad as it will reduce the validity
non-partiicpant observation advantage
P = more objective
E = this is because the researcher maintains an objective distance so9 there is less chance of bias
E = this is good because it may increase internal validity of findings
non-partiicpant observation disadvantage
P = loss of insight
E = this is because the researcher may be too far removed from these they study
e = bad because it may reduce the external validity of the findings
observations strength
P = capture what people do
E = people often act differently from how they say they will in slef report methods
E =2.718 give insights into spontaneous behaviour
observations weakness
P = risk of observer bias
E = researcher’s interpretations of the situtation may be affected by expectations
E = bias can be reduced by using more than one observer
naturalistic observation
takes place where the target behaviour would normally occur
naturalistic strength
high external validity
natural context = behaviour is liekly to be spontaneous
= more generalisable
naturalistic weakness
low control
may be uncontrolled CVs/EVs
makes it more difficult to detect patterns
controlled observations
some control/ manipulation of variables including controls of CVs and EVs
controlled observations strength
can be replicated
due to standradised procedures
findings can be checked
controlled observations weakness
may have low external validity
behaviour may happen due to the setting
Findings cannot be applied to everyday experience
observational design - behavioural categories weaknesses X2
difficult to make clear - not always possible to make clear, and not overlap
observational design - event sampling strength
useful for infrequent behaviour
observational design - event sampling weakness
if the event is too ocmplex = important details may go unrecorded
= affects validity
observational design - time sampling strength
reduces the number of observations = is more structured and systematic
observational design - time sampling weakness
may be unrepresentative - researcher may miss important details