Occupiers' Liability Flashcards

This deck solely covers case law, refer to revision notes for understanding

1
Q

a degree of control- s.1 (2) OLA 1957

A

Wheat v Lacon 1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a warning on its own does not discharge

A

unless “in all the circumstances it was enough to enable the visitor to be reasonably safe”- s.2 (4)(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

it is reasonable to instruct a subcontractor S.2 (4) b

A

Haseldine v Daw [1941]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

responsible to check work of subcontractor- s.2 (4) (b)

A

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

not a risk you should expect to be protected against- drowning in water

A

Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

D had no knowledge of risk- OLA 1984

A

Rhind v Astbury Water Park Ltd [2004]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

specialists bear the risk- chimney sweeps-s.2 (3) (b)

A

Roles v Nathan [1963]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Has D breached the duty?- s.2(2)- window catch case

A

White Lion Hotel v James

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

warnings- s.2 (4) (a)
There is no duty to warn of the obvious danger

A

Darby [2001]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

loss must be due to state of the premises

A

Keown [2006]; Siddorn [2007]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the risk is one, which is reasonable to protect the trespasser from -s.1(3)(c) OLA 1984

A

Young v Kent [2005]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly