occupiers liability Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

act for lawful visitors

A

OLA 57

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

OLA 57

A

act for lawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

act for unlawful visitors

A

OLA 84

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

OLA 84

A

act for unlawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

definition of an occupier case

A

wheat v lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wheat v lacon

A

definition of an occupier case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

definition of premises act

A

s.1(3)(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

s.1(3)(a)

A

definition of a premises act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

s.2(1) OLA 57

A

all lawful visitors are owed a duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

all lawful visitors are owed a duty of care

A

s.2(1) OLA 57

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

s.2(2) OLA 57

A

occupiers have a duty to ensure visitors are reasonably safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

occupiers have a duty to ensure visitors are reasonably safe

A

s.2(2) OLA 57

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

adult visitors

A

s.2(2) / Cunningham v reading FC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s.2(2) / Cunningham v reading FC

A

adult visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

child visitors

A

s.2(3)(a) / Glasgow corp v Taylor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

s.2(3)(a) / Glasgow corp v Taylor

A

child visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

skilled visitors

A

s.2(3)(b) / roles v Nathan

18
Q

s.2(3)(b) / roles v Nathan

A

skilled visitors

19
Q

s.1(3)(b) OLA 57

A

C can claim for personal injury and property damage

20
Q

C can claim for personal injury and property damage

A

s.1(3)(b) OLA 57

21
Q

s.1(1)(a) OLA 84

A

trespassers are owed a duty of care

22
Q

trespassers are owed a duty of care

A

s.1(1)(a) OLA 84

23
Q

geary v Weatherspoon

A

trespasser exceeds limits of their invitation

24
Q

trespasser exceeds limits of their invitation

A

geary v Weatherspoon

25
s.1(1) OLA 84
dangerous state of premises
26
dangerous state of premises
s.1(1) OLA 84
27
s.1(3) OLA 84 tests
1. d knew of danger 2. d knew c was in vicinity of danger 3. danger was one d would reasonably have to provide protection from
28
1. d knew of danger 2. d knew c was in vicinity of danger 3. danger was one d would reasonably have to provide protection from
s.1(3) OLA 84 tests
29
tomlinson v congleton bc
danger was one d would reasonably be expected to provide protection against
30
danger was one d would reasonably be expected to provide protection against
tomlinson v congleton bc
31
s.1(8) OLA 1984
trespassers can only claim for personal injury and not property damage
32
trespassers can only claim for personal injury and not property damage
s.1(8) OLA 1984
33
s.2(4)(a)
warning must be 'sufficient'
34
warning must be 'sufficient'
s.2(4)(a)
35
authority of contributory negligence
law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945
36
law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945
authority of contributory negligence
37
from v butcher
contributory negligence
38
contributory negligence
from v butcher
39
Simms v Leigh rugby
consent
40
consent
simms v Leigh rugby
41
s.1(5) OLA 84
warnings
42
warnings
s.1(5) OLA 84