OCR Oral Flashcards
(113 cards)
Define Radar Identification (1)
MATS RAC 1-30
The situation which exists when the radar position of a particular aircraft is seen on a radar display and positively identified by the air traffic controller.
Define Radar Position Symbol (1)
MATS RAC 1-31
The visual indication, in symbolic form, on a radar display, of the position of an aircraft obtained after automatic processing of positional data derived from primary and/or secondary surveillance radar.
Provide safety is not jeopardised, how shall traffic priorities be applied? (3)
MATS RAC 2-6 7
Provided safety is not jeopardised, traffic priorities shall be applied as follows:
- an aircraft known or believed to be in a state of emergency or impaired operation has priority over all other aircraft; and
- an aircraft landing, or in the final stages of an approach to land, has priority over a departing aircraft; and
- an aircraft landing or taking off has priority over taxiing aircraft.
Where practical, and following a request from the pilot, aircraft involved in, or positioning for what form of activities shall be granted priority? (4)
MATS RAC 2-6 7
Where practical, and following a request from the pilot, aircraft involved in, or positioning for, the following activities shall be granted priority:
- ambulance or mercy missions; and
- search and rescue; and
- civil defence or police emergencies; and
- carriage of heads-of-state, heads-of-government, or equivalent dignitaries.
Define Coordination (8)
MATS RAC 3-1 1.1
Coordination is the process of negotiation between two or more parties that results in an agreed course of action. To ensure a common understanding and continuity in the provision of an air traffic service to aircraft concerned, coordination shall be carried out between affected sectors/units for all IFR and controlled VFR flights, with agreement being reached on:
- clearances/instructions, as appropriate;
- estimate messages;
- information estimate messages;
- transfers of control;
- revisions to the significant point or level contained in an estimate message;
- approval requests;
- advice or information to be issued to aircraft.
State the methods by which Coordination may be achieved? (4)
MATS RAC 3-1 1.1
Coordination may be achieved by:
- direct two-way negotiation and agreement for individual flights, either verbally or electronically; or
- agreements specified in LOA/LUO; or
- use of SkyLine for specific coordination:
- using IFL in the datablock for aircraft under radar control and the IFL is below the coordinated level between sectors; or
- where the coordination process is documented in LOA/LUO between two units:
(a) X-Note function when approved by Policy, Standards and Safety Improvement for that coordination; or
(b) VIS key function when an aircraft requests and is cleared for a visual approach, and instructions are issued to the aircraft that includes tracking to an agreed distance on final coincident with the advertised approach and a descent restriction at least 500 ft above upper level of aerodrome area of responsibility.
What is the time criteria for passing an estimate between an oceanic sector and an area sector for arriving and departing flights? (1)
MATS RAC 3-2 1.3
For a flight crossing a sector boundary where continuous radar control service is being provided, the time criterion is reduced to 10 minutes. A further reduction from 10 minutes may be specified in LOA/LUO. The time criteria between flights crossing from Area to Oceanic sectors may be reduced when specified in LOA/LUO
List the Elements of an Estimate message (8)
MATS RAC 3-3 1.4.1
The applicable elements from those listed shall be included in the estimate message:
- ESTIMATE
- (aircraft callsign)
• (departure/set heading time . . . minutes only), for domestic to oceanic flights only
(significant point), NAVAID, REP, aerodrome, etc.
- (ETO next REP or ETA at DEST), whichever is applicable
- (level) or CLIMBING TO (level) or (level) DESCENDING TO (level)
- (type of approach [and route if required]), area/approach to aerodrome
- (other information, if necessary and not passed by an FDP)”, e.g. routing requests
Within the Radar environment, what is the criteria for revising the level information contained in an Estimate message? (1)
MATS RAC 3-5 1.4.2.3
When an aircraft requests a level change after the CPL or estimate has been passed traffic permitting, it may be cleared to the requested level before the revision is passed provided: • The revision and acceptance is entirely within a radar environment; and
• the revision, acceptance or alternative level coordination is completed prior to the aircraft being 5 NM from the transfer of control point
What shall an accepting controller do in response to an Estimate message that is passed within the applicable time criteria for such a message? (3)
MATS RAC 3-9 1.5.4
When a CPL or estimate message is passed in sufficient time to meet the coordination time criteria, the accepting controller shall:
- if no objection is raised, be understood to have accepted the transfer of control in accordance with LOA/LUO or the terms offered; or
- indicate any required amendments, including a change of cruising level or route if the level offered is below the MSA for the route sector or the minimum level above SUA within the accepting controller’s area of responsibility; and
- if necessary, specify any other information or clearance applicable at the transfer of control point.
When shall an information message be passed? (1)
MATS RAC 3-3 1.4
An information estimate shall be passed to the appropriate unit(s) when an aircraft will pass within the specified distance of a contiguous airspace boundary, but transfer of control or RTF will not be effected. Information estimates shall contain the following minimum data:
• call sign,
• SSR code (if allocated),
• route,
• time
• level over the significant point on or nearest to the contiguous airspace boundary.
During Coordination it may be necessary to specify or confirm who is providing separation between flights. What phraseology is used in this situation? (2)
MATS RAC 3-10 1.5.7
During coordination, when it is necessary to specify or confirm who is providing separation, or where one controller may be able to offer a more expeditious resolution of a confliction than the other, the following phraseology shall be used:
“YOUR SEPARATION (callsign of traffic from which separation is required)”
Details of any information pertinent to the provision of separation shall be passed to the controller effecting the separation.
The phraseology “MY SEPARATION (callsign of conflicting traffic)” may be used in response to “YOUR SEPARATION”, or to further identify who is providing the separation.
Provide an example of the phraseology used to request an early release of an aircraft? (2)
MATS RAC 3-10 1.5.8
An early release may be requested using the following phraseology:
“MAY I ASSUME CONTROL OF (callsign)”; or
“REQUEST RELEASE OF (callsign)”
Note: Response as for Transfer of Control - Transferring Controller
Following an early release of an aircraft, when is an accepting controller required to verbally coordinate with the previous controller? (3)
MATS RAC 3-10 1.5.8
Verbal coordination is required prior to an accepting controller climbing an arriving aircraft, descending a departing aircraft or instructing an aircraft to hold while the aircraft is still in the transferring controller’s airspace
Who is responsible for ensuring an aircraft establishes radio contact with the next controller and what guidance is provided for making initial enquiries as to the whereabouts of the aircraft? (2)
MATS RAC 3-12 1.6.1
The responsibility for ensuring that the aircraft establishes radio communication lies with the accepting controller. If the aircraft does not establish radio communication at the RTF contact point, efforts shall be made to establish communication. Initial enquires as to the whereabouts of the aircraft shall be commenced not later than three minutes after the anticipated time of contact
When may an ATC clearance be withheld? (3)
MATS RAC 3-14 2.1.1.1
An ATC clearance shall not be denied or withheld except:
• for traffic reasons, when ATC cannot accommodate traffic additional to that already accepted due to traffic congestion, limitations of equipment, procedures, weather or environmental conditions, emergencies and other similar factors; or
- when instructed by the Head of Service Delivery provided that:
- a clearance shall not be withheld unless the aircraft is on the ground and the clearance is for entry onto the manoeuvring area.
- normal ATC service shall be provided for any aircraft entering the manoeuvring area without an ATC clearance.
Where direct communications cannot be established certain agencies are permitted to relay ATC clearances. Give 4 examples of a relaying agency. (4)
MATS RAC 3-15 2.1.2.1
Where direct communications are not established, clearances may be transmitted through a relay agency that may be:
- an operating position at the same unit;
- another ATS unit;
- an air-ground station; or
- another aircraft
State the objectives of instructions contained in a clearance to an IFR flight. (8)
MATS RAC 3-17 2.1.4.2
Instructions contained in a clearance to an IFR flight shall:
provide separation:
• where prescribed, between the aircraft concerned and other controlled flights; and
• from SUA and GAA as required by RAC 5; and
(A flight departing under radar control may be issued with initial track or level instructions which, while not providing separation for the entire route, will provide separation until it can be identified and instructed to climb under radar control.)
- enable the flight to comply with the promulgated procedures for IFR flights published in the AIPNZ; and
- conform with the terms for acceptance of control by the next controlling authority; and
- conform, where possible, with the details requested in the flight plan and the Air Traffic Management route requirements as specified in the AIPNZ; and
- where the aircraft has flight planned for flight within controlled airspace, enable the aircraft to remain within controlled airspace, unless applying the criteria for direct routing on unevaluated routes. If a clearance would involve a significant delay, a pilot may be offered an alternative which would take the aircraft out of controlled airspace, provided that:
- the pilot is advised that the clearance will take the aircraft outside controlled airspace; and
- the pilot confirms acceptance of the clearance
What should instructions in a clearance to an IFR flight contain? (7)
MATS RAC 3-22 2.2.1
An ATC clearance issued to an IFR or VFR flight to operate enroute shall contain the following elements in the order listed:
- Aircraft identification as shown on the flight plan, and
- If appropriate, notification and reason for unavailability of requested route and/or cruising level, and
- Authorisation to operate in controlled airspace in accordance with instructions issued, and
- Clearance limit, and
- Route instructions, and
- Level instructions, and
• Any other instructions or information as required, i.e. departure and diversionary climb instructions; • oceanic transition • separation or reporting instructions; • SSR code allocation; • any special information; • frequency change instructions; • release instructions; • delivery instructions.
What phraseology shall be used when it is not possible to clear a flight via the flight planned route or cruising level? (2)
MATS RAC 3-22 2.2.2
Where it is not possible to clear a flight via the requested or flight planned route or cruising level, the pilot shall be advised using the phrase:
“(route and/or level) NOT AVAILABLE DUE (reason) [ALTERNATIVE(S) IS/ARE (route(s) and/or level(s)) ADVISE]”
State the clearance limit for an IFR flight. (3)
MATS RAC 3-23 2.2.4
- The clearance limit shall be the aerodrome of first intended landing, a significant point or an airspace boundary.
- Where a pilot intends to carry out an instrument approach at more than one aerodrome, the clearance limit shall be the aerodrome at which the first instrument approach is to be flown.
- Where the pilot intends to operate in an operating area such as a MOA, the clearance limit shall be specified as the operating area or other suitable point.
- When an aircraft intends to leave controlled airspace, or leave and subsequently re-enter the same or other controlled airspace on the same continuous route, the clearance limit shall be the aerodrome of first intended landing. Such a clearance or revisions to it shall apply only to those portions that are conducted in controlled airspace. Traffic information shall be provided for the portion outside controlled airspace
Name Eight ways in which the ‘IFR route to be followed’ can be described. (8)
MATS RAC 3-23 2.2.5
The IFR route to be followed shall be described:
- by using a standard route clearance and the runway-in-use at destination e.g. “FASTAIR 102 CLEARED WN1 RWY 16…”; or
- by using a standard route clearance and the runway-in-use at a controlled aerodrome adjacent to the aerodrome of departure or destination e.g. “PAPA KILO MIKE CLEARED HN 1 WHENUAPAI RWY 03 …” or
- by using a standard route clearance and the arrival procedure at aerodrome of destination e.g. “FASTAIR 001 CLEARED WN2 NS1B ARRIVAL . . .”; or
- by using the arrival procedure for the aerodrome of destination provided that the arrival procedure commences at or adjacent to the aerodrome of departure e.g. “FASTAIR 996 CLEARED SF1A ARRIVAL . . .”; or
- by using a standard route clearance e.g. “FASTAIR 919 CLEARED PM1 . . .”; or
- by using the word “VIA” followed by a detailed description of the route, using reporting points and/or ATS routes; e.g. “FASTAIR 616 CLEARED TO NR VIA V393 WN H103 . . .”; or
- by using the phrase “VIA FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE”, to describe the route (as filed by the pilot/company) which is detailed in the flight plan. e.g. “FASTAIR 317 CLEARED TO PM VIA FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE . . .”
[The phrase “VIA FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE” shall not be used when the flight plan has been annotated with “RDR” in the RMK field (“RDR” shall not be entered into international flight plans). “RDR” requires the route to be described as per the previous bullet;] or
• by using the word “VIA” followed by a detailed description of the route, using reporting points and /or ATS routes, up to and including the point at which the flight is to rejoin the route in the flight plan, followed by the phrase “THEN FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE”. e.g. “FASTAIR 442 CLEARED TO AA VIA SW H159 CH THEN FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE . . .”
Note: For this option the flight planned route can be a Standard Route Clearance
What restrictions apply to the use of the term ‘Via Flight Planned Route’ when describing the IFR route to be followed? (3)
MATS RAC 3-24 2.2.5.2
Domestically, the use of the term “FLIGHT PLANNED ROUTE” should be avoided if at all possible. Its use should be limited to:
- oceanic flights; or
- flights where the route is identified with latitudes and longitudes; or
- flights with a long or complicated route field.
What procedures shall apply where an aircraft wishes to fly IFR on an unevaluated route through airspace in which an ATC clearance is required? (9)
MATS RAC 3-25 2.2.6
Within controlled airspace, when traffic permits, an IFR aircraft may be cleared on an unevaluated route direct to a navigation aid, reporting point, significant point, or specified fix (for pilot interpreted intercept of an instrument approach) subject to the following conditions:
- the pilot requests the direct routing, or agrees to a controller proposal; and
- the pilot is responsible for navigation unless being radar vectored; and
- separation, including from SUA, GAA and parachuting, is provided where appropriate; and
- irrespective of any strip posting which has or has yet to take place, direct routing or any deviation which affects the next and subsequent sectors requires coordination: either;
- verbally; or
- by agreement in LUO/LOA; and
- when under radar control, the track and distance of the direct route is passed to the pilot when considered necessary; and
- when under radar control but under their own navigation, the controller shall monitor the track and inform the pilot whenever a deviation greater than 5 NM from track is observed; and
- when direct routing to a fix for a pilot intercept of an RNAV (GNSS) approach, the specified fix shall be no later than the fix prior to:
- the final approach fix (FAF); or
- the final approach point (FAP); and
- when direct routing to a fix for a pilot intercept of an RNAV (RNP) approach, the specified fix shall be no later than the fix prior to the final approach (FAF), and this fix must not be on or at the start of a constant radius arc to a fix (RF) leg; and
- when direct routing to a fix on an instrument approach the aircraft must be able to intercept the VPA or GP at an altitude that will enable normal descent on the approach from the intercept point