Offences and penalties (Offences against the environment) Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

Section stating the offences

A

s101 of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A PERSON COMMITS AN OFFENCE IF THEY:

A

1) Breach specific sections:
Break or ignore the rules in S: 57(1), 57(1A), 65(1), 67(2), 71(1), 81(1), or 81A(1).
Disobey any public notice issued under A 9A or 57(2).
Disregard a directive issued under A 69(2) or 73(3).

2) If they hold a permit and:
Break the rules in S 69(1) or 73(1).
 Do something outside the conditions of their permit.

3)* Fraudulent actions:*
 Illegally **change **a permit.
Forge or fake a permit or document.
Use, carry, or distribute a fake or altered permit.
Lie to get a permit.
Help someone else commit any of the offences listed above.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

provision regulating penalties

A

s102 of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

S 102 On penalties if convicted of an offence

A

1) General penalty = fine of up to R10 million, or up to 10 years in prison, or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2) If offence involves certain species or activities:

A

For
* threatened / protected species
* alien species
* or unlicensed bioprospecting

the penalty is fine of either:
* Up to R10 million,
* Three times the commercial value of the species / activity involved,
- Whichever is greater.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3) For listed invasive species:

A

 A fine based on: - Either the general penalty or - The estimated cost of controlling the species involved, - Or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4) Magistrate’s Court power:

A

 A magistrate’s court can impose all penalties listed above, even if
normally higher courts would be required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case law

A

S v Lemtongthai

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S v Lemtongthai

A
  • Accused fraudulently produced 26 permits which permitted him to hunt
    rhino’s. - - - - -
    He was charged in terms of S 57 of the Act, because he also sold rhino
    horns.
    Charged on 26 counts
    He was found guilty + sentences to 30 years imprisonment.
    Appealed against his sentence, and the court reduced it, but he still
    received a harsh sentence.
    Note: performing restricted activities ito endangered species
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly