Offender profiling (top-down and bottom-up profiling) Flashcards
What is offender profiling?
- A method used to narrow down the search for a criminal based on different approaches; top-down approach and the bottom-up approach.
What is the top-down approach?
- This approach uses the crime scene to help identify a murderer.
- It is a method developed by the FBI in 1970’s from interviews with 36 sexually motivated serial killers.
- It uses information from the crime scene to categorise murderers as ‘disorganised’ or ‘organised’ killers.
Characteristics of organised killers
- Show evidence of advanced planning.
- Deliberately target victims.
- Reflects perpetrators “type”.
- Maintain a high degree of control.
- Body likely to have been moved.
- May operate with “detached surgical precision”
- Above average intelligence, skilled/ professional occupation, socially/ sexually competent.
- Usually married with children.
Characteristics of a disorganised killer
- Little evidence of planning.
- Spontaneous/ spur of the moment.
- Scene reflect the impulsive nature of the attack.
- Body in situ.
- Little evidence of control in the offender’s part.
- Lower than average intelligence.
- Unskilled work or unemployed.
- History of sexual dysfunction/ failed relationships.
- Live alone and close to the scene.
What are the 4 sections of the FBI profiling process?
- Data assimilation.
- Crime classification.
- Crime reconstruction.
- Profile generation.
What is data assimilation?
- Data compiled from police reports, post mortems, crime scene photos etc.
What is crime classification?
- Profilers decide whether the crime scene is organised or disorganised.
What is crime reconstruction?
- Hypotheses about crime sequence, offender and victim behaviour etc.
What is profile generation?
- Offender’s physical, demographic and behavioural characteristics.
Evaluation of the top-down approach - (Alison 2002)
- Assumptions about stable types of criminals (limited reductionist approach)= highly likely that most criminals won’t fit into a specific category (this is because criminals always have different motivations).
Evaluation of the top-down approach - (Godwin)
- Subjective judgements= Godwin suggested there was no objective tool for drawing the line on the characteristics of organised and disorganised killers, meaning there are issues for reliability and accuracy.
Evaluation for the top-down approach -&+ (FBI Science Unit)
- = Small and unusual sample size, self report means there is a limitation in representiveness and generalisability.
+ = However they took a qualitative approach (in depth interviews provide insight and valuable information).
Evaluation of the top-down approach + (Canter)
- Canter analysed 100 murders and compared them to 39 characteristics associated with disorganised killers.
- He found only patterns for organised killers.
- Canter used a technique called the small space analysis.
- This is a statistical technique that identifies correlations across different samples of behaviour.
Support for the top-down profiling approach (Meketa)
- Tina Meketa (2017) reports that top-down profiling has recently been applied to burglary, leading to an 85% rise in solved cases in 3 US states.
- The detection method retains the organised-disorganised distinction but also adds two new categories; interpersonal (offender usually knows their victim and steals something of value) and opportunistic (generally inexperienced young offender).
- This suggests that top-down profiling has wider application than was originally assumed.
What is the bottom-up profiling approach?
- The aim is to generate a picture of the offender (characteristics, routine behaviour, social background etc.) through analysis of the crime scene.
- This method then builds a picture of the potential criminal from facts and figures collated from previous crimes of the same type.
- This includes:
1. Investigative psychology.
2. Geographical profiling.
What is the process of bottom-up profiling?
- Data gathered from the crime scene.
- Compared against patterns on a database of previous crimes and offenders.
- Assumptions are made using the database.
- Offender profile is generated from these assumptions.
What is geographical profiling?
- Involves analysing the location of a connected series of crimes, and looking at factors such as the spatial relationship between the different crime scenes and what this reveals in relation to the perpetrator.
- Rossmo stated that an offender’s operational base of possible future offences were revealed by the geographical location of their previous crimes (also known as spatial consistency).
What are the 3 main principles which help shape a profile using geographical profiling?
- Locatedness.
- Systematic crime location choice.
- Centrality.
What is locatedness?
Some crimes have several locations and they are all really important for a profiler’s point of view. Locations include:
1. Where the victim is met initially.
2. Where the attack occurs.
3. Where the victim is actually killed.
4. Where the body is disposed of.
What is the systematic crime location choice?
- This principle states that locations are not random.
- Familiarity is important to the offender.
What is centrality?
- This principle states that there are 2 types of offender: commuters and marauders.
- Commuters travel to commit the crime (but it is still likely to be somewhere that is familiar to them).
- Marauders commit crimes close to home.
- This centrality means that the crimes must cluster.
What is the circle theory?
- Proposes two models of offender behaviour.
- People operate within a limited spatial mind set that creates imagined boundaries in which crimes are likely to be committed.
What is investigative psychology?
- Patterns that occur or co-exist across crime scenes are used to generate data about the offender.
- It is based on the psychological theory of matching behavioural patterns to generate data on the offender.
Assumptions of investigative psychology that underpin the crime (3)
- Interpersonal coherence.
- Significance of time and place.
- Forensic awareness.