Offer & Acceptance Flashcards
(33 cards)
What is the difference between an offer, and an invitation to treat?
Offer = clear firm indication of terms
Invitation to treat = not legally binding
What does Gibson v MCC say about invitations to treat
-negotiation about a council house
An invitation to treat is NOT an offer
What are the 3 types of invitations to treat
Goods in a shop window
Goods on a shelf
Written advertisements
What case says goods in a shop window are an invitation to treat?
Fisher v Bell
What case says goods on a shelf are an invitation to treat?
PSGB v Boots
What case says written advertisements are an invitation to treat?
Partridge v Crittenden
According to Carlill v CSBC, what are the two exceptions as to when an offer can be made from an ad?
Carlill = smoke ball medicine
Offer can be made from a written ad IF:
1. advert is unequivocally clear in details
2. it is a unilateral contract open to everyone
What does Harvey v Facey say?
-asked about the price of a farm
A request for invitation (and a response to this request) ≠ offer
Whats the difference between a uni/bi lateral contract
Unilateral - a contract fulfilled by an offeree’s performance; no one is forced to take on the contract
Bilateral - both parties are obliged to perform their side of a contract
When do offers end?
Offers end in several ways:
* Acceptance
* Rejection
* Death of the offeror
* Counter-offer
* Lapse of time
* Withdrawal/revocation
Each method has specific implications for the validity of the offer.
What happens when a counter-offer is made?
Case?
A counter-offer ends the original offer.
As per Hyde v Wrench
What is meant by ‘lapse of time’ in the context of offers?
Case?
Offers end after the lapse of a reasonable time if no time is stated.
Ramsgate Hotel v Montefiore
Hotel agreed to sell shares 5 months later than when the offer was made
Can an offer be revoked after a set time has been communicated?
Yes, offers can be revoked even if they were set to be open for a specified amount of time.
This is supported by the case of Routledge v Grant.
What is required for a revocation of an offer to be valid?
The revocation must be communicated to the offeree.
This was established in Dickenson v Dodds.
Can an offer be revoked based on third-party information?
Yes, offers can be revoked when the offeree receives reliable information from a third party that the offer was withdrawn.
This is also supported by the case of Dickenson v Dodds.
What are the forms of acceptance?
Acceptance can be made in writing, verbally, or by conduct
This highlights the different ways acceptance can be communicated in contract law.
Is there acceptance until the offeree communicates it to the offeror?
No, there is no acceptance until offeree communicates it to offeror
This emphasizes the necessity of communication in the acceptance process.
What case established that the offeror can specify how acceptance is communicated?
Yates v Pulleyn
This case illustrates that the offeror has the right to dictate the method of acceptance.
What does the case Felthouse v Bindley signify regarding silence and acceptance?
Silence/inactivity is NOT acceptance UNLESS it is a unilateral contract
This case indicates the limitations of using silence as a form of acceptance.
What is the significance of the case Carlill v CSBC in contract law?
It established the concept of unilateral contracts
This case is a key example of how unilateral contracts function in legal terms.
What does the postal rule state regarding acceptance?
Case?
Postal acceptance is communicated as soon as the letter is put in the offeree’s postbox
Adams v Lindsell
This rule applies regardless of when the offeror receives or reads it.
What conditions must be met for the postal rule to apply?
The letter must be stamped and addressed correctly, and sending letters must be the usual term of communication
These conditions ensure the validity of postal acceptance.
In the case Byrne v VT, what was the outcome regarding revocation?
Only acceptances are affected by the postal rule, not offers or revocations
This case clarifies the limitations of the postal rule concerning revocation.
What does Holwell v Hughes state about acceptance when ‘notice in writing’ is requested?
Acceptance is only effective when received by the offeror
This case highlights the importance of receipt in the acceptance process when specific conditions are imposed.