Oligopoly, growth/rationalisation .3. Flashcards
(48 cards)
market share
the proportion of sales revenue in a market taken by a firm or a group of firms
concentration ratio
the combined market share of the n largest firms in the industry
if the concentration ratio is high it is described as …
highly concentrated. oligopoly or monopoly
if the concentration ratio is low it is described as …
dilute. monopolistic competition or perfectly competitive
oligopoly
a market where a small number of interdependant firms compete with each other
characteristics of oligopoly
- high barriers to entry and exit
- dominated by a few firms
- firms are interdependant on each other
- differentiated products
3 types of PRICE competition
- price war = firms lower prices to outcompete other firms and gain market share
- predatory pricing = illegal strategy where a firm sets price bellow average variable costs in the short run to force out rivals from the market
- Limit pricing = price is set low enough to deter new entrances into the market
Non-price competition
firms investing in advertising, branding and research and development to make them stand out and gain more of the market share rather than changing prices
kinked demand curve theory
demand curve is kinked providing price stability, shows the effect of a change in price on other firms (interdependant)
why is there no point raising price above p1 on the kinked demand curve
other firms keep their price at p1. The firm that raised the price to p2 has a large fall in sales due to elastic demand so their revenue falls from p1 x q1 to p2 x q2
why is there no point cutting price to p3 on the kinked demand curve
other firms may also cut the price. if demand is inelastic ,all firms see their revenue fall, from p1 xq1 to p3 x q3
collusion and reasons for it
collective agreements between producers which restrict competition, overt (open) or tacit (silent)
reasons for :
- profit maximisation
- prevent price and revenue instability
reasons for non-collusive behavior
- desire to increase market share and achieve market dominance
- regulators and punishments act as a deterrent to collude
what is overt or formal collusion
firms make agreements among themselves to restrict competition by raising prices, via comunication
what is tacit collution
firms collude without any formal agreements or communication
cartel
an agreement between firms on price and output normally with the intention of maximising their profits
conditions for an effective cartel
- cheating prevented (firms dont cheat so that they can keep making extra profit)
- all firms in the market must agree (otherwise demand goes to cheapest firm)
- potential competition must be restricted
- demand is fairly price inelastic (necessities, otherwise people will go without)
diagram to show cartel
monopoly diagram
example of price collusion
Scania fined 880 EUROS for price collusion in 2017, collusion with 5 other truckmakers
benefits of collusion
- increased profits due to increased prices
- increased barriers to entry
evaluation/disadvantages/limitations of collusion
- only when few firms dominate
- illegal = 10% of global revenue if they get caught
- decreased competition and therefore decreased innovation
CARTEL MORE STABLE IF: - high barriers to entry
- few firms dominate
- cheating is punished
- demand is inelastic
what is the dominant strategy of each firm in the game theory
to set a low price as they will make more profit whatever strategy the other firm chooses
what is the outcome if both firms collude
if both firms collude they may both set high price and gain more profit. However this is unstable (less stable than low price) because neither firm can trust each other and so a firm may cheat and lower the price to gain more profit.
strengths of game theory
- helps us to understand the benefits of collusion
-helps us to understand why collusion may break down and firms may compete - illustrates interdependence and uncertainty