Oligopoly, growth/rationalisation .3. Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

market share

A

the proportion of sales revenue in a market taken by a firm or a group of firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

concentration ratio

A

the combined market share of the n largest firms in the industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

if the concentration ratio is high it is described as …

A

highly concentrated. oligopoly or monopoly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

if the concentration ratio is low it is described as …

A

dilute. monopolistic competition or perfectly competitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

oligopoly

A

a market where a small number of interdependant firms compete with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

characteristics of oligopoly

A
  • high barriers to entry and exit
  • dominated by a few firms
  • firms are interdependant on each other
  • differentiated products
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 types of PRICE competition

A
  • price war = firms lower prices to outcompete other firms and gain market share
  • predatory pricing = illegal strategy where a firm sets price bellow average variable costs in the short run to force out rivals from the market
  • Limit pricing = price is set low enough to deter new entrances into the market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-price competition

A

firms investing in advertising, branding and research and development to make them stand out and gain more of the market share rather than changing prices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

kinked demand curve theory

A

demand curve is kinked providing price stability, shows the effect of a change in price on other firms (interdependant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why is there no point raising price above p1 on the kinked demand curve

A

other firms keep their price at p1. The firm that raised the price to p2 has a large fall in sales due to elastic demand so their revenue falls from p1 x q1 to p2 x q2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why is there no point cutting price to p3 on the kinked demand curve

A

other firms may also cut the price. if demand is inelastic ,all firms see their revenue fall, from p1 xq1 to p3 x q3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

collusion and reasons for it

A

collective agreements between producers which restrict competition, overt (open) or tacit (silent)
reasons for :
- profit maximisation
- prevent price and revenue instability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

reasons for non-collusive behavior

A
  • desire to increase market share and achieve market dominance
  • regulators and punishments act as a deterrent to collude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is overt or formal collusion

A

firms make agreements among themselves to restrict competition by raising prices, via comunication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is tacit collution

A

firms collude without any formal agreements or communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cartel

A

an agreement between firms on price and output normally with the intention of maximising their profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

conditions for an effective cartel

A
  • cheating prevented (firms dont cheat so that they can keep making extra profit)
  • all firms in the market must agree (otherwise demand goes to cheapest firm)
  • potential competition must be restricted
  • demand is fairly price inelastic (necessities, otherwise people will go without)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

diagram to show cartel

A

monopoly diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

example of price collusion

A

Scania fined 880 EUROS for price collusion in 2017, collusion with 5 other truckmakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

benefits of collusion

A
  • increased profits due to increased prices
  • increased barriers to entry
21
Q

evaluation/disadvantages/limitations of collusion

A
  • only when few firms dominate
  • illegal = 10% of global revenue if they get caught
  • decreased competition and therefore decreased innovation
    CARTEL MORE STABLE IF:
  • high barriers to entry
  • few firms dominate
  • cheating is punished
  • demand is inelastic
22
Q

what is the dominant strategy of each firm in the game theory

A

to set a low price as they will make more profit whatever strategy the other firm chooses

23
Q

what is the outcome if both firms collude

A

if both firms collude they may both set high price and gain more profit. However this is unstable (less stable than low price) because neither firm can trust each other and so a firm may cheat and lower the price to gain more profit.

24
Q

strengths of game theory

A
  • helps us to understand the benefits of collusion
    -helps us to understand why collusion may break down and firms may compete
  • illustrates interdependence and uncertainty
25
weaknesses limitation evaluation of game theory
- assumes demand is inelastic - assumes both players are rational - assumes players know the payoffs - assumes only 2 oversimplified firms with 2 options
26
3 types of price competition
- price war = firms repeated lower their prices to outcompete other firms - predatory pricing = firms put prices bellow AVC in an attempt to force out rivals (short run) - limit pricing = firm sets prices low enough to deter new entrants from coming into its market - price discrimination - price skimming = firms set high price before other firms enter the market
27
3 types of non-price competition
- branding - advertising - product development = investment in RnD - new production methods = investment in new technology to improve efficiency and push down LRAC - mergers/takeovers - collusion
28
contestable market
a market with low barriers to entry and exit (perfect knowledge)
29
what are the preditions of the contestability model
- supernormal profits can be earned in the short run - if new entrant sees existing firms making supernormal profit, it will be worth while them entering the market if there are low exit costs (sunk costs), even if they get driving out by low prices in the long run, they still earned short run profits - 'Hit and run' competition firms enter for short run supernormal profit and then leave once high profits have been exausted. NEW firms must have no competitive disadvantage. - only normal profits in the long run because new firms force price cuts - encourages established firms to keep prices down and produce as effectively as possible, EOS, new technology and X-efficient
30
in the long run what does the 'monopoly diagram' look like in a contestable market
allocatively efficient and productive efficient, MC, AR and AC all meet at the same point
31
pros of contestable market
- allocatively efficient AR=MC - productive efficiency MC=AC - x-efficient - job creation
32
cons of Contestable markets
- lack of dynamic efficiency - cost cutting in dangerous areas (H/S) - creative destruction (new firms enter and destroy existing firms)
33
evaluation of contestable markets
- length of contestability (anticompetitive and price cutting decreaseds length of contestability) - technology may not just increase contestability it may decrease it because patents and copywriting may be more common - regulation may limit cost cutting in dangerous areas
34
stakeholders
groups who have an interest in the activity and performance outcomes of a business E.g. shareholders, employees,trade unions, consumers
35
what are the 4 business objectives
- profit maximisation MC=MR - sales maximisation AC=AR (growth maximisation, flood the market) - revenue maximisation MR=0 (predatory pricing) - profit satisficing (sacrificing profit to satisfy as many key stakeholders as possible)
36
public sector
owned and controlled by the state (gov)
37
private sector
owned by individuals or groups of individuals
38
benefits of small medium firms
- easier communication better decision making - more flexible and adaptable - small niche markets may have less competition
39
evaluation of firms remaining small or medium sized
- big firms benefit from economies of scale and small ones are less efficient - less recourses to invest in research and development - less access to supply chains (less bulk buying power) - less brand awareness - less competition means less incentive to reinvest profits
40
what are the 2 types of business growth
internal/organic, occurs when a firm increases in size through investment in capital or an increased labour force or external growth, occurs due to mergers or takeovers
41
merger
integration of two firms maintaining shared ownership or control
42
takeover
acquisition of one firm by another firm where control where control passes to the aquiror
43
4 types of external growth mergers
vertical integration : (joining of two firms at different production stages in the same industry) - forward vertical integration e.g. retail car showroom - backward vertical integration e.g. supplier horizontal integration : integration with another firm in the same industry at the same production process Conglomerate: merger between two firms producing unrelated products
44
demerger
when a firm splits into two or more independant businesses
45
reasons for demergers
- to avoid diseconomies of scale from becoming to big - eliminate any culture clash - refocus on core activities
46
how do demergers result in increased profits
lowering costs through reduced diseconomies of scale. Removed culture clashed which lead to poor decision making.
47
whats the impact of demergers workers
pros : - job creation (new opertunities in the industry) - could be higher saleries if profits rise cons: - lower saleries if unsuccessful - less job security in a smaller firm
48
examples of demergers
Lloyds TSB demerger 2013 to try to increase competitiveness of the banking sector