OMFS 2 Sweep 1 Flashcards

(135 cards)

1
Q

A —– is imperative prior to definitive treatment

A

histological diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A true cyst contains an

A

epithelial lining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inflammatory

A

Periapical Cyst

Residual Cysts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Developmental

A
Dentigerous Cyst
Odontogenic Keratocyst 
Lateral Periodontal Cyst
Glandular Odontogenic Cyst
Calcifying Odontogenic Cysts (Gorlin’s Cyst
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MANAGEMENT OF CYSTS

A

Enucleation
Enucleation & curettage (E&C)
Marsupialization
Staged marsupialization & enucleation (decompression technique)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Enucleation
Treatment of choice for —–
Removal of the entire cystic lesion without —–
——– allows a cleavage plane between lesion and bony cavity

A

cystic lesions

rupture

Fibrous connective tissue (CT) wall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
Enucleation
Indications
------
Common examples
------
A

Any cyst that can be removed in entirety & safely without harming adjacent structures

Dentigerous cyst
Periapical cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Enucleation
Advantages
—– examination of the entire cystic wall
——- is curative in certain situations

A

Histopathologic

Initial biopsy/treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Enucleation

Disadvantages

A

Possible pathological fracture
Devitalization of teeth
Injury to nerve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Enucleation

Technique

A

Gain access to cyst
Aspirate
Use largest curette that defect will allow: Cleavage plane
Concave surface toward bone

Visualize bony cavity for soft tissue remnants
Smooth bony margins and obtain water tight primary closure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
Enucleation
Post-operative course
Diet/activity modification
Meticulous oral hygiene
May require close follow-up with periodic panoramic radiograph (every ------)
-----months for bony fill
Expanded bone will recontour over time
A

6 months

6-12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Enucleation & Curettage (E&C)
——- first
Mechanical (burs) curettage is performed to remove —— of bone at the entire periphery of the bony cavity
Can use the curette aggressively to accomplish, but outcome is better with mechanical

A

Cyst is enucleated

1-2mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Enucleation & curettage
Indications
When removing a known ——-
Second surgery after ——

A

aggressive cyst such as an OKC (high recurrence)

recurrence when 1st surgery (enucleation) was deemed curative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Enucleation & curettage
Advantage
——-

A

Destroys any suspected epithelial remnants, decreasing chance of recurrence

Damage to neurovascular bundle
Dental pulps stripped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Marsupialization
Open a cystic lesion and maintain —– to an adjacent cavity
(Oral cavity, maxillary sinus, or nasal cavity)
Decreases —– pressure
Cyst shrinkage
Bony fill
Sole treatment (rarely) or as a preliminary step before ——–

A

patency

intracystic

definitive enucleation of the smaller cyst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
Marsupialization
Indications
---- at risk with enucleation
Difficult ----- to all portions of cyst
Increases ---- rate
Medical compromise
A

Adjacent vital structures

surgical access

recurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
Marsupialization
Advantages
--- to perform
Can spare -----
Either ------ or makes it -----
A

Simple

vital structures

completely resolves lesion

much smaller and easier to treat and reconstruct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
Marsupialization
Disadvantages
Cannot -----
Areas left behind may be -----
Patient inconvenience with ------
Occasional secondary infections
A

histologically examine the entire cystic wall

more aggressive than piece removed

home care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Marsupialization

Technique

A

Aspirate
Create 1cm or large elliptical incision in soft tissue
Create bony window
Piece of cystic lining removed and submitted for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q
Marsupialization;
histopatholgic exam
----- evacuated
Keep ------ patent
Thick cystic lining: suture to ----
Thin/friable cystic lining: ------
A

Cystic contents

window into cyst

oral mucosa

pack cavity for 10-14 days to prevent oral mucosa from healing over window

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Marsupialization
Post-operative course
—- is responsible for irrigating the cystic cavity
Cavity may become secondarily infected
Routine follow-up with —– to assess progress

**How long do you leave the cavity open?
Until —— have been met

A

Patientradiographic evaluation

goals for choosing marsupialization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Staged marsupialization & enucleation

Known as “——” technique

A

decompression

Opening cyst to oral cavity (marsupialization) and surgical plan is to make the cyst smaller (decompression) for final E&C at a later date
This is more commonly performed vs. marsupialization alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Staged marsupialization & enucleation
Lesion marsupialized and allowed time for:
——

Routine follow-up with radiographic assessment until bone fill stalls and/or goals met

Enucleate remaining cyst
—– around opening of cyst
Remove all —–

A

Bone cover of vital structures
Increased strengthening of jaw

Elliptical incision

cystic lining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Staged marsupialization & enucleation
Indications
Concern for ——-
Size of lesion
Marsupialization alone does not resolve lesion
Need to examine entire lesion histopathologically

A

injury to adjacent anatomical structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
``` Staged marsupialization & enucleation Advantages Develops a ---- cystic lining Reduces ------ complete healing Same as for marsupialization Simple to perform Can save vital structures Completely resolves lesion or makes it smaller and easier to treat and reconstruct ```
thickened morbidity and accelerates
26
Staged marsupialization & enucleation Disadvantages ----- marsupialization Patient inconvenience Occasional secondary infection Cannot histologically examine the entire cystic wall However, ------ can remedy this concern
Same as for secondary enucleation
27
Periapical Remove ------ ---- +/- curettage ------ if necessary
underlying process – RCT or extraction Enucleate Antibiotics
28
Residual
E&C
29
Dentigerous cyst ------ If larger – consider --------
Extraction of affected tooth + E&C staged marsupialization and E&C
30
Odontogenic Keratocyst (OKC) ---- with potential ----- If larger – consider -----
E&C extraction staged marsupialization and E&C
31
Lateral periodontal cyst | ---- with preservation of ----
Enucleation tooth
32
Glandular odontogenic cyst ----- and ----- Some advocate -----
Enucleation curettage more aggressive treatment (resection
33
Calcifying odontogenic cyst (Gorlin’s) | ----- and ------
Enucleation curettage
34
Epithelial tumors
Ameloblastoma Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (Pindborg) Squamous odontogenic tumor
35
Mixed epithelial & ectomesenchymal tumors
Ameloblastic fibroma Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma Odontoma
36
Ectomesenchymal tumors
Odontogenic fibroma Odontogenic myxoma Cementoblastoma
37
Tumors: Poorer prognosis in ----- due to undetected growth
maxilla
38
``` Enucleation & Curettage of Jaw Tumors Indications ------ tumors Most ------ tumors Medically compromised ```
Slow-growing, non-aggressive odontogenic
39
Enucleation & Curettage of Jaw Tumors | Tumor Types
``` Odontoma Ameloblastic fibroma/fibro-odontoma AOT Cementoblastoma Odontogenic fibroma ```
40
Enucleation & Curettage Tumor Surgical Technique
Local removal of the tumor by instrumentation or direct contact with the lesion Technique same as for cysts May have to section lesional tissue
41
Resection of Jaw Tumors Indications ----- lesions either by histopath or clinical behavior Tumors need a margin of ----- to decrease chance of recurrence Tumors that would be difficult to remove in entirety by -----
Aggressive uninvolved tissue (hard or soft) enucleation/curettage alone
42
Resection of jaw: tumor types
``` Tumor Types Ameloblastoma Myxoma CEOT Squamous odontogenic tumor ```
43
``` Resection Technique - tumors: Lesion is removed with a ---- margin of uninvolved tissue Marginal – maintains continuity at ----- Segmental – ------- portion removed Total – remove ----- ```
1cm inferior border full-thickness entire jaw
44
Osteoinduction |  New bone formation from differentiation of ---- cells, derived from ------- cells, into ------.
osteoprogenitor mesenchymal osteoblasts
45
Osteoinduction |  Differentiation is influenced by ------ from the bone -----.
bone inductive proteins matrix
46
Osteoinduction  Host cells must be stimulated to differentiate into the osteoblasts by ------.
transplanted growth factors and cytokines
47
 BMP (Bone Morphogenic Protein)  Initiates -------.  Member of the ----- family of growth factors
osteoinduction cytokine
48
 BMP (Bone Morphogenic Protein)  Acts on ---- cells to induce differentiation into ------.
progenitor osteoblasts
49
 BMP (Bone Morphogenic Protein)  Higher in --- bone vs. -----.
cortical cancellous
50
Osteoconduction |  Formation of new bone from either ------ along a biologic framework.
host-derived or transplanted osteoprogenitor cells
51
Osteoconduction |  Provide only ------
passive framework or “scaffolding.”
52
Osteoconduction |  Does not ------- – conducts ------- from host into/around the scaffolding.
actually produce bone bone forming cells
53
Osteogenesis  Formation of new bone from ----- cells.  Have ------- and ------ properties.  Only ------- grafts possess all these criteria.
osteoprogenitor osteoinductive, conductive autogenic
54
Two-Phase Theory of Osteogenesis  PHASE I  Transplanted cellular bone produces new -----. The amount of bone regeneration depends of the amount of ------------.  Considerable amount of cell death occurs during grafting procedures, and this phase may not lead to an impressive amount of regeneration.  Determines ------ of bone that the graft will form.  Most active within------ weeks.
osteoid transplanted bone cells that survive quantity 4
55
Two-Phase Theory of Osteogenesis  PHASE II ------- from the graft bed begin after grafting, and ------ from host connective tissue soon begins.  Initial ------- is resorbed and replaced by ------ bone. As the initial graft is resorbed, ------ proteins are released from the matrix.  Determines ------.  Begins at ------ and peaks around -------.  Remodeling process continues indefinitely.
Angiogenesis and fibroblastic proliferation osteogenesis woven bone, lamellar, bone morphogenic quality 2 weeks, 6 weeks
56
Autografts: possible ----- properties
osteogenic
57
```  Allografts/Homografts  ------  Cadaver bone  Carries ------ in some cases  Replaced by patient’s own bone  No donor site morbidity  Readily available  Disadvantages include no ------ for phase I osteogenesis, longer ------ period, encapsulation, disease transmission, graft/host reaction and patient acceptance. ```
Osteoconductive inductive proteins viable cells, consolidation
58
``` Xenograft  Grafts transplanted between individuals of different species (i.e. bovine bone/Bio-Oss)  No donor site morbidity  -------  Carrier for ------ proteins (possible)  Limitless quantity  Disadvantages include expense and longer ----- period, disease transmission and patient acceptance ```
Osteoconductive inductive consolidation
59
 BMP-2=Infuse® has been approved for ----- and grafting of ----- defects
sinus floor augmentation mandibular
60
Recombinate grafts not approved for
Not approved in children/skeletally immature patients
61
Diseases associated with bone healing problems
Drug (Medication) Related Osteonecrosis (MRONJ) of the Jaws Osteo-Radio-Necrosis (ORN) Osteomyelitis
62
Drugs associated with MRONJ
- Bisphosphonates 2- Anti-Resorptive agents (e.g: Denosumab ) 3- Anti-Angiogenic medications (e.g: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies targeting VEGF)
63
What are Bisphosphonates (BP)?
Synthetic analogs of inorganic pyrophosphate
64
How do Bisphosphonates work?
How do they work? High affinity for Ca2+ Inhibition of osteoclasts May inhibit capillary neo-angiogenesis
65
BP indications: | Oral
Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Paget’s disease Osteogenesis- Imperfecta
66
IV
Bone metastases associated with solid tumors Hypercalcemia of malignancy Multiple myeloma
67
Diagnosis of MRONJ Current or previous treatment with a ---- Exposed bone in the ------ that has persisted for more than ---- weeks No history of ----- to the jaws
bisphosphonate maxillofacial region Eight radiation therapy
68
Fosamax (alendronate) | Actonel (risedronate)
Oral BP
69
Aredia (pamidronate) Zometa (zolendronate) Reclast (zolendronate)
IV BP
70
Boniva (inandronate)
IV and Oral BP
71
Anti-angiogenic agents: e.g:
Sunitinib
72
Why in the jaws ? MRONJ
Increased bone turnover in the jaws (Remodeling rate is 10 times more than long bones ) Thin overlying oral mucosa due to jaw anatomy.
73
``` Asymptomatic patient taking oral BP Sound recommendations are still lacking <4 years : ----- <4 years +risk factor (Steroid/anti-Angiogenic meds.) :------- >4 years: -------- ```
proceed with planned treatment Stop BP therapy 2 months prior to treatment Drug holiday for 2 months
74
Clinical Stage 1 MRONJ
Exposed/necrotic bone Asymptomatic No infection Treatment Oral antimicrobial rinses (e.g. Peridex)
75
Clinical Stage 2 MRONJ
Exposed/necrotic bone Pain Infection Treatment Oral antimicrobial rinses Antibiotic therapy
76
Clinical Stage 3 MRONJ
``` Findings Exposed/necrotic bone Pain Infection One or more of the following: Fracture, extra-oral fistula, oro-nasal communication. osteolysis ``` Treatment Surgical debridement or resection Antibiotic therapy
77
Osteo-Radio-Necrosis (ORN)
A condition in which Irradiated bone becomes exposed through a wound in the overlying skin and/or mucosa and persist without healing for 3 to 6 months
78
ORN Three Hs theory
Hypoxia Hypovascularity Hypocellularity
79
ORN Stage 1
Superficial involvement, only Cortical bone exposed Treated with Conservative : Chlorhexidine MW
80
ORN Stage 2
Localized involvement with involvement of cortical and medullary bone Treatment: Conservative : Local debridement w,w/o HBO Chlorhexidine MW
81
ORN Stage 3
Diffuse involvement including inferior border. Usually associated with pathologic fracture and possible osteo-cutaneous fistula Treatment: Surgical resection and reconstruction
82
Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment may
Stimulates: collagen synthesis Angiogenesis Epithelialization
83
Osteomyelitis
An inflammatory process of the bone marrow that involves cancellous and cortical bone with a tendency of progression.
84
Osteomyelitis occurs more in
mandible than maxilla
85
Osteomyelitis Predisposing factors
Immune-compromised patients: DM Alcoholism (malnutrition) Myeloproliferative disease : leukemia, sickle cell Chemotherapy Fractures and Odontogenic infections in immune-compromised patients Osteopetrosis (AlbersSchonberg disease
86
Radiogrpahic“Moth-eaten” appearance | Radio-opacities Sequestra (islands of necrotic non-resorbed bone)
Osteomyelitis
87
Clindamycin is the Antibiotic of choice for
osteomyelitis
88
Osteomyelitis: Hospitalization may be required for ---- Mild cases : ----- Severe cases : up to -----
IV Abx 4 weeks 6 months
89
Osteomyelitis: Surgical:
Debridement/Marginal resection/Segmental re section (depend on involvement to remove dead bone
90
Buccal plate
1mm
91
Lingual plate
1mm
92
Sinus
1mm
93
IAN
2mm superior
94
Mental foramen
5mm from anteiror/bony foramen
95
Inferior border
1mm
96
Adjacent tooth
2mm
97
Implant to implant distance
3mm
98
Block graft Augment horizontal dimension of alveolus Harvested graft traditionally shaped like a block ----- bone Block maintains space under soft tissue while remodeling Site ready for implant placement --- months
Cortical +/- cancellous 4-6
99
Intraoral Donor Sites | chin & Ramus
Limited quantity Isolated defects of 1-2cm in size No cancellous needed Small but real risk of paresthesia
100
Extraoral Donor Site | Iliac crest
Large quantity of bone Two surgeon “team” allows for harvest and site preparation simultaneously Requires sterile field and anesthetic/surgical support that may limit venue and increase cost Extraoral scar and site distant from oral cavity may not be well accepted by the patient
101
For bone grafting w/prosthetic:
Temporary prosthesis Non-load bearing Limit wear
102
Difficult to obtain vertical augmentation due to ----
pressure from Soft tissue envelope or a prosthesis
103
Vertical graft concerns: Increased risk of ------ Inadequate ------- to recipient bed ------ rates greater than with horizontal augmentation
graft/membrane exposure adaptation and/or fixation of the bone graft Resorption
104
Latency phase of distraction O
Revascularization Osteoprogenitor cells accumulate 4-7 days
105
Distraction phase of distraction O
1mm per day osteoblast induction Woven bone formation
106
Consolidation phase of distraction O
2-3 months active distraction complete Bony regenerate remodels into mature bone
107
Autograft ready in ---- vs. allograft (-------) | BMP quick but cost prohibitive
4 months, 6-8 months
108
Indirect sinus lift Augmentation yield ~
4mm of bone
109
– Closed lock:
like a catch, but stays that way for minutes, hours, days, etc.
110
– Catching:
opens easily part way but gets caught at 1-2 finger-widths of opening, then opens the rest of the way
111
Stiffness:
can stretch more (with pain) vs. moves ok then hits a brick wall
112
Palpate posterior maxillary vestibule • Lateral/posterior – ------ • Posterior on ascending ramus – --------
masseter origin temporalis insertion
113
– “----” MR units are not suitable for TMJ imaging
Open
114
– ----maximizes contrast, resolution
T1
115
– ---- demonstrates fluid, higher S/N ratio
T2
116
Rotational movement: --- mm • Translational movement: ----- mm • Lateral excursions move contralateral joint------
20 40-50 : 7-10 mm
117
• Why might one skip arthrocentesis?
* Long duration of symptoms * History of failed steroid injection/arthrocentesis * Long history of late, hard, painful pop * Unable to obtain MRI * Certain implants, severe claustrophobia, morbid obesity * Anticipated difficulty with arthrocentesis • Obesity; anxious but has anesthetic risks
118
Arthrocentesis | • Indications
* Acute closed lock * Acute trauma (hemarthrosis) * Capsulitis/synovitis
119
Arthrocentesis | Advantages
* Minimally invasive * Fast, simple procedure – usually done in office * Does not require general anesthetic * Highly effective at increasing joint mobility, reducing pain
120
Arthrocentesis | • Disadvantages
• Indications not well established except for acute closed lock • May not adequately release adhesions, etc. • Limited success for chronic or more severe conditions
121
Indications for Arthroscopy
* Pain and dysfunction with the following conditions: • Decreased condylar translation due to disk hypomobility * Anteriorly displaced disk with or without reduction • Closed lock * Traumatic injury
122
Advantages of Arthroscopy
* Minimally invasive * Outpatient procedure * Rapid recovery * Excellent success (80-95%) * Low morbidity * Allows examination under anesthesia
123
Disadvantages of Arthroscopy
* Advanced disease may not improve * Disk unlikely to reposition * Failure usually requires open surgery * Requires aggressive postoperative physical therapy and patient compliance * Morbidity includes nerve or middle ear injury (both extremely rare)
124
Adhesion types •
Light, filmy | • Fibrous bands • Pseudowall
125
Disk pathology
* Neovascularization • Fibrillation | * Perforation
126
Adhesion lysis
* Light adhesions – in course of inspection * Heavier bands, walls – * Use blunt trocar * Sweeping motion lateral-medial * Light contact with articular surface * Reassess with arthroscope
127
Lavage | • Quantity rarely a concern, typically ----- or more • Lactated Ringer’s vs. Normal Saline?
2-300ml
128
• Arthrotomy:
Incision into the joint
129
• Arthroplasty:
Repair, revision, and/or | reconstruction of joint tissues (hard and soft)
130
• Meniscectomy=
Discectomy: Removal of the disk
131
Disk Repair/Repositioning Procedures | • Indications
* Minimal disk displacement | * Otherwise generally healthy joint tissues • Near-normal disk morphology
132
Disk Repair/Repositioning Procedures | Disadvantages:
• Often do not change disk position • Pop or click may recur
133
Meniscectomy (Discectomy) with/without Interpositional Graft | • Graft Materials (if used):
* Dermis * Temporal fascia * Auricular cartilage
134
Meniscectomy (Discectomy) with/without Interpositional Graft | Indications
* Severe degenerative changes in disk * Disk beyond repair * Severe interference with normal function (for example, patient with late, hard, painful pop on mouth opening due to disk reduction)
135
Meniscectomy (Discectomy) | Disadvantages
Disadvantages • Malocclusion or failure uncommon but possible • Replacement requires graft harvest • Replacement may offer little benefit over meniscectomy without graft • Alloplastic materials (artificial disks) not available