Organisations Movements And Members Flashcards
(43 cards)
Churches (Troeltsch)
- large organisations with millions of members
- run by a bureaucratic hierarchy of professional priests
- claim a monopoly of the truth
- universalistic
- attractive to higher classes because they are ideologically conservative and closely linked to the state
Sects (Troeltsch)
- small exclusive groups
- hostile to wider society
- expect a high level of commitment
- draw their members from the poor and oppressed
- led by a charismatic leader rather than a bureaucratic hierarchy
- claim a monopoly of the truth
Denominations (Niebuhr)
- membership is less exclusive than a sect but don’t appeal to the whole of society like a church
- like churches they broadly accept society’s values but aren’t linked to the state
- impose minor restrictions on members eg forbidding alcohol but aren’t as demanding as sects
- tolerant of other religious organisations and don’t claim a religious monopoly of the truth
Cult (Niebuhr)
- individualistic, loose knit small group around shared themes and interests but usually without a sharply defined and exclusive belief system
- led by practitioners or therapists who claim special knowledge
- tolerant of other organisations and their beliefs
- don’t demand strong commitment from followers who are more like customers or trainees than members
- world affirming, claiming to improve life in this world
Similarities and differences between religious organisations - Wallis
- How they see themselves
While churches and sects claim a religious monopoly of the truth, denominations and cults accept that there can be many valid interpretations - How they are seen by wider society
Churches and denominations are seen as respectable and legitimate while sects and cults are seen as deviant
Bruce’s critique of Troeltsch
Bruce says that his idea of churches having a religious monopoly only applies to the catholic church before the Protestant reformation. Since then, sects and cults have flourished and religious diversity has become the norm. Churches have lost their monopoly and been reduced to the status of denominations competing with all the rest.
World rejecting NRMs
- clearly religious organisations with a clear notion of God
- highly critical of the outside world and expect or seek radical change
- to achieve salvation , members must make a sharp break with their former life
- members live communally with restricted contact with the outside world. The movement controls their lives and is accused of brainwashing them
- have conservative moral codes
World accommodating NRMs
- breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations
- neither accept nor reject the world and focus on religious rather than worldly matters, seeking to restore the spiritual purity of religion
- members lead conventional lives
World affirming NRMs
- accept the world as it is. Are optimistic and promise followers success in terms of mainstream goals and values like careers and personal relationships.
- non exclusive and tolerant of other religions but claim to offer additional special knowledge for followers to unlock spiritual powers for success or overcoming problems. Described as psychologising religions which offer this-worldly gratification
- most are cults and followers are customers. Few demands are placed on them and they live normal lives
Evaluate Wallis’ classification of the NRMs
- it isn’t clear whether he is categorising them according to the movements teachings or individual members’ beliefs.
- he ignores the diversity of beliefs that may exist within an NRM
- Wallis himself recognises that real NRMs rarely fit into his typology and some may have features of all three types
- Stark and Bainbridge reject the idea of constructing typologies and say we should use one criterion to identify between religious organisations: the degree of conflict between the religious group and wider society.
Sects (Stark and Bainbridge)
Sects result from schisms- splits in existing organisation. They break away from churches usually because of disagreements about doctrine. S&B say they promise other-worldly benefits to those suffering economic deprivation or ethical deprivation.
Cults (Stark and Bainbridge)
New religions that have been imported eg Scientology. S&B say they offer this-worldly benefits to prosperous individuals who are suffering psychic deprivation (normlessness) and organismic deprivation (health problems)
Audience cults (S&B)
The least organised and don’t involve formal membership or much commitment. Little interaction between members. Participation may be through the media. Eg astrology
Client cults (S&B)
Based on the relationship between a consultant and a client and provide services to their followers. Emphasis on therapies which promise personal fulfilment and self discovery.
Cultic movements (S&B)
Most organised and demand high levels of commitment. Aims to meet its members needs and they are rarely allowed to belong to other religious groups at the same time. Eg moonies
Marginality as an explanation for the growth of NRMs
Weber says sects arise in groups who are marginal to society. These groups may feel that they are disprivileged ie not receiving their just economic rewards or social status.
Sects offer a solution to this by offering their members a theodicy of disprivilege ie a religious explanation and justification for their suffering.
Relative deprivation as an explanation for the growth of NRMs - Wallis
Relative deprivation is the subjective sense of being deprived compared to others. M/c people who are materially well off may feel spiritually deprived and so turn to sects as Wallis argues
Relative deprivation as an explanation for the growth of NRMs - Stark and Bainbridge
The relatively deprived break away from churches to form sects. S&B say
- world rejecting sects offer the deprived the compensators they need for the rewards they are denied in this world
- the privileged don’t need compensators and so are attracted to world accepting churches that express their status and bring them further success in achieving earthly rewards.
Social change as an explanation for the growth of NRMs: Wilson and Bruce
- Wilson says social change disrupts the established norms and values, producing anomie/normlessness. In response to the uncertainty and insecurity this creates, those who are most affected turn to sects as a solution
- Bruce sees the growth of sects and cults as a response to social changes involved in modernisation and secularisation. Society is now secular so people don’t want traditional churches and strict sects because they demand too much commitment. So they turn to cults which are less demanding.
Explanations for the growth of world rejecting NRMs
Wallis points to social changes:
- increased time spent in education gives young people freedom from adult responsibilities and enabled a counter culture to develop
- the growth of radical political movements offered alternative ideas about the future
World rejecting NRMs were attractive in this context because they offered young people a more idealistic way of life
Bruce says the failure of counter culture to change the world led to disillusioned youth turning to religion instead
Explanations for the growth of world affirming NRMs
Bruce says the growth is a response to modernity, especially the rationalisation of work: work no longer provides meaning or a source of identity yet we are still expected to achieve even though we may lack the opportunities to succeed. World affirming NRMs provide both a sense of identity and techniques that promise success in this world.
Niebuhr’s ideas on whether sects are short or long lived
He argues that sects are world rejecting organisations that come into existence because of schism. They are short lived and that within a generation they either
- die out
- compromise with the world
- abandon their extreme ideas
- become a denomination
What are the three reasons Niebuhr gives for why sects are short lived
- the second generation who are born into the sect lack the commitment of their parents
- the Protestant ethic effect
Sects that practise asceticism tend to become prosperous and so the members will be tempted to compromise with the world - death of the leader
Sects with a charismatic leader either collapse when they die or a bureaucratic leadership takes over , turning it into a denomination
The sectarian cycle (S&B)
Stage 1. Schism
Tension between the needs of deprived and privileged members of a church makes deprived members break away and form a world rejecting sect
Stage 2. Initial fervour
Charismatic leadership and tension between the sect’s beliefs and those of wider society
Stage 3. Denominationalism
The Protestant ethic effect and the coolness of the second generation mean the fervour disappears
Stage 4. Establishment
The sect becomes more world accepting and tension with wider society reduced
Stage 5. Schism
Happens when more zealous or less privileged members break away to lead a new sect true to the original message