pain Flashcards

1
Q

people with an absence of pain

A

some people are congenitally insensitive to pain
loss of pain sensation (nerve damage) can be caused by diabetes mellitus and leprosy
absence of pain means you are unaware of minor injuries – bad!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

pain as an enigma

A

differs from classical senses as it is discriminative and a graded motivation (behavioural drive)
mystifying symptoms e.g. allodynia, placebo
pain of intolerable levels can disappear in some intense situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

theories of pain: specificity vs convergence

A

specificity = pain is a distinct sensation, detected and transmitted by specific receptors and pathways to distinct pain areas in brain

convergence = pain is integrated and plastic, pattern of convergent somatosensory activity within distributed network - neuromatrix

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

specificity theory - sensory receptor classifications (2 categories)

A

classified by: activating stimulus, fibre-type, conduction velocity
lightly myelinated A(delta) fibres - fast ~20m/s
- mechano-sensitive
- mechano-thermal-sensitive
unmyelinated C fibres - slow ~2m/s
- polymodal = mechanical, thermal, chemical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

specificity theory - nociceptors proof with heat

A

respond specifically to pain
subset of afferents with free nerve endings

demonstrated with heat where thermoreceptor activation is already saturated before pain is perceived - therefore must be separate receptors for pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

fast vs slow pain

A

fast = sharp and short = mimicked by stimulation of A(delta) fibre nociceptors
slow/second pain = delayed, long lasting = mimicked by stimulation of C fibre nociceptors

stimulation of Aa or Ab proprioceptive and mechanoceptive fibres never elicits pain – therefore must be distinct receptors for pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

molecular pain receptors e.g. heat and spice

A

receptors with nociceptive nerve endings - activated by heat and spicy food
capsaicin receptor (TRPV1 - transient receptor potential protein) activated by nociceptive A(delta) and C fibres at 45 degrees and by capsaicin (in chilis)
other TRPs activated in A(delta) fibres alone at 52 degrees (direct response to heat)
capsaicin mimics endogenous vanilloids (heat chemicals) released by stressed tissues - therefore nociceptors could also work by detecting these

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 central pain pathways

A

sensory discriminative:
- signals: location, intensity, type of stimulus
- easiest to define - spinothalamic tract (anterolateral system)

affective-motivational:
- signals: unpleasantness
- enables autonomic activation - fight or flight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pain in somatosensory cortex

A

region responds to painful stimuli
response correlates to intensity of pain
spatially mapped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cortical representations of pain shown by MRI

A

comparison of cortical activation by painful (C fibre) or painless (Ab fibre) mechanical stimuli on skin
painful stimuli activates same region of somatosensory cortex as non-painful
therefore pain activates a distinct response that includes other regions:
- insula and cingulate gyrus activated:
- connected to limbic system (emotional response)
- part of affective-motivational response to pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

affective-motivational pathway

A

shares some paths with anterolateral system
little or no topographic mapping
parabrachial nucleus = responds to pain from anywhere on surface of body
input to limbic (emotions) and hypothalamic (homeostasis) systems
strong correlation of painful experiences with cingulate cortex (not pain intensity - that is on the discriminative pathway instead)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

specificity vs convergence: evidence supporting (3) and unexplained by specificity (5)

A

supporting:
- presence of cellular and molecular receptors which respond to pain specifically - Ao and C fibres, TRPV1
- specific pathways that convey pain
- regions of CNS specifically and distinctly activated in response to pain

unexplained:
- pain perception is not always proportional to intensity of stimulus
- modulation by other stimuli (e.g. acupuncture)
- perception of pain in severed limbs (phantom limbs)
- referral of pain from viscera to skin
- placebo effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sensitisation - hyperalgesia

A

increased response to painful stimulus
normally tolerable painful stimulus e.g. light skin prick
result of lowered nociceptor thresholds so pain response is heightened
e.g. prostaglandin lowers threshold for action potential generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sensitisation - allodynia

A

painful response to normally innocuous stimulus
relay neurons become sensitive to nearby non-nociceptive inputs
e.g. painful sensitivity of sunburnt skin to gentle stimulus e.g. light brushing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

central sensitisation

A

activity dependent local release of substances from nociceptive dorsal horn neurons
e.g. hyperalgesia (periphery, makes painful stimuli more painful, lowers action potential thresholds); allodynia (innocuous stimuli perceived as painful)
can also occur when central pathways are damaged e.g. diabetes, shingles, MS, stroke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hyperpathia

A

variant of hyperalgesia and allodynia
fibre/axonal loss/damage (centrally or peripherally) raises detection threshold
greater stimulus needed to feel pain - when threshold is reached pain is explosive

17
Q

phantom limb pain

A

neuropathic pain
illusion of present limb
central representation of body is not passive - persists in absence of peripheral input
even when born without limb can feel limb - central map may be partly preformed
difficult to stop this pain - due to central representation

18
Q

referred pain

A

pain due to damage in viscera often perceived as coming from specific locations in skin according to what organ is affected e.g. heart attack preceded by pain in left shoulder and arm
due to convergence of visceral (organ related) afferents onto same pathway as cutaneous (skin related) afferents in the CNS

19
Q

central modulation of pain (3)

A

impact of context on pain perception
e.g. not feeling severe pain during war
placebo effect - thinking of relief provides relief
mechanisms (voluntary or involuntary) to overcome even severe pain

20
Q

physiological basis of pain modulation

A

stimulating area of mid brain provided pain relief:
- periaqueductal grey => brainstem nuclei which modulate activity of dorsal horn neurons
these descending inputs activate enkephalin-releasing interneurons which inhibit nociceptive fibres presynaptically

enkephalins = endogenous opioid peptides - include endorphins and dynorphins

21
Q

local modulation of pain

A

rubbing injury to relieve pain = local inhibition by mechanoreceptors (Ab fibres) of nociceptive (C fibre) inputs in the spinal cord

sensory interaction (gate) theory of pain:
pain perception from the integration of convergent sensory information