Painting & Drawing Flashcards
(246 cards)

Francis Picabia, Ideal (Here, This Is Stieglitz Here), 1915
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
New York Dada
Francis Picabia created Here, This Is Stieglitz Here (Ici, c’est ici Stieglitz) in 1915, after having relocated to New York from Paris earlier that year. While in New York, the Cubist painter met the American photographer Alfred Stieglitz, who would later organize an exhibition of Picabia’s works at his legendary gallery 291 and collaborate with him on the Dada publication 291 in which Here first appeared. In this portrait, Picabia is clearly referencing Duchamp’s machinist aesthetic as well as his ironic wit. Part of a series of machine portraits of his artist-friends in New York, Here depicts Stieglitz as a broken bellows camera with an automobile brake attached to it that is in motion. It is important to underscore that this series of machine portraits did not celebrate the hyper-mechanized culture of the early twentieth century. Machinist imagery formed a vocabulary that Picabia drew upon in order to capture the modern human spirit. His work is not a comment on the frenzied fascination with which contemporary culture viewed the machine but, rather, a demonstration of how such mechanized symbols can successfully articulate the seemingly opposed values of an individual’s sensibility. Picabia has written “Ideal” in an old-fashioned, delicate, highly detailed script that effectively contrasts with the modern-day, sleek machine upon which it perches. The elaborate Gothic font hearkens back to an outdated mode of portraiture and, generally speaking, of painting, against which Picabia is clearly working. More importantly, it addresses Stieglitz’s own idealism that, according to those in his circle, had failed to inspire Americans toward self-discovery through art and photography. Indeed, Stieglitz’s goal was too grandiose, hence the lofty placement of “Ideal” above the mass-produced object—an object that connotes a commercially driven reality more characteristic of America at this moment in history. Spearheading the effort to introduce the dominant artistic practices of Europe to American artists, Here embraces the humor with which Picabia and Duchamp mocked traditional artistic styles and techniques, and that would characterize their proto-Dada practices during the time they lived in New York.

Douglas Gordon, 24 Hour Psycho, 1993
Young British Artists (YBA)
24 Hour Psycho is the title of an art installation created by artist Douglas Gordon in 1993. The work consists entirely of an appropriation of Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 Psycho slowed down to approximately two frames a second, rather than the usual 24. As a result it lasts for exactly 24 hours, rather than the original 109 minutes. The film was an important work in Gordon’s early career, and is said to introduce themes common to his work, such as “recognition and repetition, time and memory, complicity and duplicity, authorship and authenticity, darkness and light.”
“24 Hour Psycho, as I see it, is not simply a work of appropriation. It is more like an act of affiliation… it wasn’t a straightforward case of abduction. The original work is a masterpiece in its own right, and I’ve always loved to watch it. … I wanted to maintain the authorship of Hitchcock so that when an audience would see my 24 Hour Psycho they would think much more about Hitchcock and much less, or not at all, about me…”
A large mirror reflects Gordon’s 24 Hour Psycho back at itself, beginning a game of spatial illusion and psychological instability that continues throughout the exhibition.
The Young British Artists, or YBAs[1] — also referred to as Brit artists and Britart — is the name given to a loose group of visual artists who first began to exhibit together in London, in 1988. Many of the artists graduated from the BA Fine Art course at Goldsmiths, in the late 1980s.
The scene began around a series of artist-led exhibitions held in warehouses and factories, beginning in 1988 with the Damien Hirst-led Freeze and, in 1990, East Country Yard Show and Modern Medicine.
They are noted for “shock tactics”, use of throwaway materials, wild-living, and an attitude “both oppositional and entrepreneurial.”[2] They achieved considerable media coverage and dominated British art during the 1990s—international survey shows in the mid-1990s included Brilliant! and Sensation.
Many of the artists were initially supported and collected by Charles Saatchi. Leading artists of the group include Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. Key works include Hirst’s The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, a shark preserved in formaldehyde in a vitrine, and Emin’s My Bed, a dishevelled double bed surrounded by detritus.
The first use of the term “young British artists” was by Michael Corris in ArtForum, May 1992.[3] The acronym term “YBA” (or “yBa”) was not coined until 1996 (in Art Monthly magazine). It has become a historic term, as most of the YBAs were born in the mid-1960s.

David Hockney, A Bigger Splash, 1967
Tate Gallery, London
British Pop Art
A Bigger Splash was painted between April and June 1967 when Hockney was teaching at the University of California at Berkeley. The image is derived in part from a photograph Hockney discovered in a book on the subject of building swimming pools. The background is taken from a drawing he had made of Californian buildings. A Bigger Splash is the largest and most striking of three ‘splash’ paintings. The Splash (private collection) and A Little Splash (private collection) were both completed in 1966. They share compositional characteristics with the later version. All represent a view over a swimming pool towards a section of low-slung, 1960s modernist architecture in the background. A diving board juts out of the margin into the paintings’ foreground, beneath which the splash is represented by areas of lighter blue combined with fine white lines on the monotone turquoise water. The positioning of the diving board – coming at a diagonal out of the corner – gives perspective as well as cutting across the predominant horizontals. The colours used in A Larger Splash are deliberately brighter and bolder than in the two smaller paintings in order to emphasise the strong Californian light. The yellow diving board stands out dramatically against the turquoise water of the pool, which is echoed in the intense turquoise of the sky. Between sky and water, a strip of flesh-coloured land denotes the horizon and the space between the pool and the building.
The painting took about two weeks to complete, providing an interesting contrast with his subject matter for the artist. Hockney has explained: ‘When you photograph a splash, you’re freezing a moment and it becomes something else. I realise that a splash could never be seen this way in real life, it happens too quickly. And I was amused by this, so I painted it in a very, very slow way.’ (Quoted in Kinley, [p.5].)
He had rejected the possibility of recreating the splash with an instantaneous gesture in liquid on the canvas. In contrast with several of his earlier swimming pool paintings, which contain a male subject, often naked and viewed from behind, the ‘splash’ paintings are empty of human presence. However, the splash beneath the diving board implies the presence of a diver.
This painting depicts a splash in a Californian swimming pool. Hockney first visited Los Angeles in 1963, a year after graduating from the Royal College of Art, London. He returned there in 1964 and remained, with only intermittent trips to Europe, until 1968 when he came back to London. In 1976 he made a final trip back to Los Angeles and set up permanent home there. He was drawn to California by the relaxed and sensual way of life. He commented: ‘the climate is sunny, the people are less tense than in New York … When I arrived I had no idea if there was any kind of artistic life there and that was the least of my worries.’
In California, Hockney discovered, everybody had a swimming pool. Because of the climate, they could be used all year round and were not considered a luxury, unlike in Britain where it is too cold for most of the year. Between 1964 and 1971 he made numerous paintings of swimming pools. In each of the paintings he attempted a different solution to the representation of the constantly changing surface of water.

Richard Long, A Hundred Mile Walk, 1971‐2
Tate Gallery, London
British Conceptualism / Land Art
This work records a walk Richard Long made on Dartmoor during New Year 1971–2, repeatedly following a circular route. In the work he records his experience of sounds heard on the walk, how he became aware of the presence of rivers as he approached them, pockets of sound in gullies, and how the sound disappeared behind him as he walked on.
The work concerns both the internal feelings and thoughts of the artist, and the external aspects of his experience during the walk. ‘Corrina, Corrina’ (Day 6) is a reference to a traditional folk song, sung by Bob Dylan.
Long made his international reputation during the 1970s, but already with sculptures made as the result of epic walks, these take him through rural and remote areas in Britain, or as far afield as the plains of Canada, Mongolia and Bolivia.
He walks at different times for different reasons. At times, these are predetermined courses and concepts; yet equally, the idea of the walk may assert itself in an arbitrary circumstance. Guided by a great respect for nature and by the formal structure of basic shapes, Long never makes significant alterations to the landscapes he passes through. Instead he marks the ground or adjusts the natural features of a place by up-ending stones for example, or making simple traces. He usually works in the landscape but sometimes uses natural materials in the gallery. Different modes of presentation, sometimes combined, were used to bring his experience of nature back into the museum or gallery.

Ad Reinhardt, Abstract Painting, No. 5, 1962
Abstract Expressionism: Hard-edge painting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5nej7Gy7kQ

Stanton MacDonald‐Wright, Abstraction on
Spectrum (Organization 5), 1914
Des Moines Art Center, Iowa
Synchromism
Stanton MacDonald-Wright (July 8, 1890 – August 22, 1973), was a modern American artist. He was a co-founder of Synchromism, an early abstract, color-based mode of painting, which was the first American avant-garde art movement to receive international attention.
Married at the age of seventeen, Macdonald-Wright moved to Paris with his wife to immerse himself in European art and to study at the Sorbonne, the Académie Julian, the École des Beaux-Arts and the Académie Colarossi. He and fellow student Morgan Russell studied with Canadian painter Percyval Tudor-Hart between 1911 and 1913. They were deeply influenced by their teacher’s color theory, which connected the qualities of color to those of music, as well as by the works of Delacroix, the Impressionists, Cézanne, and Matisse that placed a great emphasis on juxtapositions and reverberations of color.[3] During these years MacDonald-Wright and Russell developed Synchromism (meaning “with color”), seeking to free their art form from a literal description of the world and believing that painting was a practice akin to music that should be divorced from representational associations.[4] MacDonald-Wright collaborated with Russell in painting abstract “synchromies” and staged Synchromist exhibitions in Munich in June 1913, in Paris in October 1913, and in New York in March 1914. These established Synchromism as an influence in modern art well into the 1920s,[5] though followers of other abstract artists (principally, the Orphists Robert and Sonia Delaunay) were later to claim that the Synchromists had merely borrowed the principles of color abstraction from Orphism, a point vehemently disputed by Macdonald-Wright and Russell. While in Europe, Macdonald-Wright met Matisse, Rodin, and Gertrude and Leo Stein. He and Russell returned to the United States hopeful of acclaim and financial success and were eager to promote their cause.

Piero Manzoni, Achrome, 1959
Centre Pompidou, Paris
Around 1957 Manzoni began the Achromes series. Some were executed in raw gesso that had been scratched and scored, and others, for example Achrome (1959; Paris, Pompidou), consisted of cut or pleated canvas and kaolin. Although Manzoni had discovered the work of Yves Klein in early 1957 and apparently had been profoundly impressed, his own Achromes signify something different from Klein’s monochromatic works: the desire to create a space devoid of any image of colour, mark or material.
Like a number of his contemporaries, Manzoni wanted to banish narrative content from painting. For Manzoni, this meant removing even colour from his works. In 1957, he began to produce the achromes, which he described as ‘a single uninterrupted and continuous surface from which anything superfluous and all interpretative possibilities are excluded.’ He began by soaking his canvases in kaolin, a soft china clay used in making porcelain. The kaolin eliminated colour to the point of his desired ‘nothingness’. The weight of the material caused it to sag, creating folds across the surface of the canvas.
Manzoni’s work changed irrevocably after visiting Yves Klein’s exhibition ‘Epoca Blu’ at the Galleria Apollinaire in Milan, January 1957. This exhibition consisted of 11 identical blue monochromes. By the end of the year he had ceased producing work influenced by the prevailing trends in Art Informel, to works that responded directly to Klein’s monochromes.
The kaolin works are generally made from clay covered canvases folded horizontally, or sometimes cut-out squares of canvas coated in the clay and adhered onto the canvas. As well as Yves Klein, these works showed the influence of Lucio Fontana and Alberto Burri and the American artist Robert Rauschenberg, who had painted neutral white canvases in 1951.
Later he would create Achromes from white cotton wool, fiberglass, rabbit skin and bread rolls. He also experimented with phosphorescent paint and cobalt chloride so that the colours would change over time. In addition to these fabricated materials, the artist’s own bodily products and features became art. In addition to his famous Merda d’Artista, in which Manzoni’s own excrement became a series of art objects, the use of fingerprints, blood, and breath also figured into his experimental body of work

Sherrie Levine, After Piet Mondrian, 1983
Appropriation Art
Watercolor reproduction
Sherrie Levine was born in 1947 in Hazelton, Pennsylvania. She attended the University of Wisconsin in Madison, receiving her BA in 1969 and her MFA in 1973. She moved to Berkeley in 1973 and two years later relocated to New York. Her early series, Sons and Lovers (1976–77), presented thrity-five different configurations of five silhouettes, including the readily identifiable profiles of former presidents Lincoln, Washington, and Kennedy. Critic and curator Douglas Crimp included this work in his seminal exhibition Pictures at Artists Space in New York in 1977. Levine again utilized the presidential profiles in 1979, this time cut from pages in fashion magazines, for the series Presidential Collages. For Fashion Collages (1979), she exhibited unaltered images from magazines mounted on sheets of paper. In the early 1980s Levine extended her strategy of appropriation, which challenged art-critical concepts like originality and authenticity, when she rephotographed works by famous photographers including Eliot Porter, Edward Weston, and Walker Evans. For her series After Egon Schiele (1982/2001), Levine photographed the Expressionist painter’s frenzied, acutely personal self-portraits, which she later copied in watercolor in 2001. She also exhibited excised reproductions of works by Andreas Feininger, Claude Monet, and Vincent van Gogh, among others, as her own collages in 1980, 1982, and 1983, respectively. Also in 1983 Levine began to meticulously recreate—whether in watercolor, ink, or photolithography—printed reproductions of works by iconic male modernists like Joan Miró, Piet Mondrian, and Edgar Degas.
In After Alexander Rodchenko (1987–98), Levine appropriated the photographs of the Russian Constructivist. This time with the help of a computer, Levine reduced iconic modernist works by the likes of Piet Mondrian, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, and Claude Monet to their most basic coloristic summaries in grids entitled Melt Down (1989–90). The artist then fashioned several sculptural pieces after works by Marcel Duchamp, Man Ray, and Constantin Brancusi: The Bachelors (After Marcel Duchamp) (1989), La Fortune: After Man Ray (1990), Fountain (After Marcel Duchamp) (1991), and Newborn (1993). In 1997 Levine began to divide her time between New York and Santa Fe, the latter of which prompted her to create several bronze sculptures of steer sculls between 2002 and 2003. In 2007 Levine again reduced pivotal modernist expressions of nature to computer-derived grids in After Cezanne.

Grant Wood, American Gothic, 1930
Art Institute of Chicago
American Realism (Regionalism)
The title’s inspiration came from the style of architecture called American Gothic in Iowa. The painting shows a farmer and his spinster daughter. The painting acquired considerable backlash in Iowa when it was accepted by the Art Institute of Chicago in a prize.
Famous image of Midwestern Regionalism, done after the Great Depression, represents sturdy regionalism and religious piety, some critics believe it to be a satire. The painting’s representation of individualism is important in a time of farm foreclosures, bank failures, and sharp decline in economic production. History painting in the sense that the farmhouse is Gothic in style, representative of spiritual morality, and the figures reinforce the spiritual uprightness of Gothicism.
- Regionalism: Wood, Benton, Curry; all focused on farms and small-town life of the American heartland
- They presented optimistic views, overlooking growing disaster of Dust Bowl
- Regionalists focused on rural life as America’s cultural background (in opposition to the
precisionists who enamored the city and technological advances)
- 1935 – published “Revolt against the City”
- American Gothic is a rural scene from Iowa, where he was born and raised
- This image catapulted Wood to national prominence
- House is “Carpenter Gothic” style
- This stresses the importance of religion in their lives
- Pitchfork signifies occupation
- Daughter associated with potted plants (behind her) which symbolize traditionally
feminine domestic and horticultural skills
- They wear traditional attire: worn overalls and apron trimmed with rickrack
- Dour facial expressions give painting severe quality
- Shows Midwesterners as “basically good and solid people”
- Regionalism was a rejection of avant-garde styles in favor of a readable, realist style
- It appealed to many who felt alienated by abstraction in art
- In light of problematic nationalism in Germany at time, this nationalistic attitude was
disturbing
- Thus regionalism had both stylistic and political implications
- Regionalism was a means of coping with the national crisis by returning to cultural roots
- Acceptable nostalgia because it perpetuated a larger purpose, survival

Charles Sheeler,
American Landscape, 1930
Museum of Modern Art, New York
American Regionalism

Karel Appel, Angry Landscape, 1967
COBRA / Tachisme
The Cobra artists, from Copenhagen, Brussels, and Amsterdam, share the interest in materials that characterized the work of Tapies and Burri, but like Dubuffet, they are more significantly drawn to the notion of “art brut” and children’s art. They embraced the notion of the subconscious as expressed in surrealist writing and art but they rejected the idea that art could come from the psychic unconscious without conscious physical control. In the place of psychic automatism, they tried to assert impurity and spontaneity as deliberate processes which would unform one’s initial perception of images; this was a deliberate attempt to harness the imagination to the perceptual world, and like Pollock, it seems to have been a deliberate attempt to represent the idea of spontaneity and impurity as opposed to producing work which truly comes from these states.
Appel’s and Jorn’s early paintings rely on heavy impasto and brilliant color, directly influenced by Van Gogh, more than any other artist, although Appel believed that any artist must learn from all artists at first, then has to forget what he learned and start over.
Karel Appel is possibly of greater interest for his three-dimensional work than for his painting, although the underlying premises are shared in both forms of production. If we were to describe Appel as having had a choice between Mondrian and Van Gogh (two artists who share his nationality but embody different paths: reason and order on one side and expressionist freedom on the other), he chose the latter as an approach which expressed the need for and manifestation of renewal. After the first world war, the dadaists responded with mockery and disorder; the de Stijl artists and other purists responded with an attempt to transcend horror; neither worked. The expressionist response– Van Gogh in the 19th century and the abstract expressionists in the 20th–in some respects is an attempt to unite both disorder and transcendence, not by reifying the horrors of what happened but by reliving it and changing it, by embracing the messy complexity and the irrational horror of the world, living through it, and achieving catharsis.

Frederick Kiesler, Art of this Century, 1942
Installation view of the Surrealist Gallery
The Art of This Century gallery was opened by Peggy Guggenheim at 30 West 57th Street in Manhattan, New York City on October 20, 1942. The gallery occupied two commercial spaces on the seventh floor of a building that was part of the midtown arts district including the Museum of Modern Art, the Museum of Non-objective Painting, Helena Rubinstein’s New Art Center, and numerous commercial galleries. The gallery exhibited important contemporary art until it closed in 1947, when Guggenheim returned to Europe. The gallery was designed by architect, artist, and visionary Frederick Kiesler.
One of the most-recognized and reproduced exhibition spaces of the twentieth century, the Surrealist Gallery was Frederick Kiesler’s design masterpiece. Within the long black-painted room, hanging curvilinear wall units displayed all the Surrealist works jutting out toward the viewer on adjustable arms. As originally presented, spotlights illuminated the paintings individually in a random electrically controlled sequence. At times the gallery was plunged into complete darkness accompanied by the ominous sound of an oncoming train.
The gallery showcased works by established European artists with an emphasis on Surrealism, and also exhibited the works of lesser known American artists, often for the first time. The space became both a meeting place and exhibition nexus for exiled European artists and young emerging Americans and as such was one of the major crucibles for the emergence of the New York School.
Art of This Century was divided into four distinct spaces: the Abstract Gallery, the Surrealist Gallery, the Kinetic Gallery, and the Daylight Gallery. The Abstract, Surrealist, the Kinetic Galleries showcased the permanent private collection which Peggy Guggenheim had amassed in Europe with the assistance of curator Herbert Read and artist Marcel Duchamp. The Daylight Gallery was used for the fifty-three temporary exhibitions featuring the work of one-hundred-and-three artists that took place from the winter of 1942 to the summer of 1947.
For his object designs, such as the biomorphic furniture in his Abstract Gallery room of Peggy Guggenheim’s The Art of This Century Gallery art salon (1942), for example. For it, he sought to dissolve the visual, real, image, and environment into a free-flowing space. He likewise pursued this approach with his “Endless House,” exhibited in maquette form in 1958–59 at The Museum of Modern Art. The project stemmed from his shop-window displays of the 1920s and his Film Guild Cinema in New York City, mentioned above. Pursuing display and art-gallery work, he was a window designer for Saks Fifth Avenue from 1928 to 1930. Earlier in his career in Europe, Kiesler invented the 1924 L+T (Leger und Trager) radical hanging system for galleries and museums.
His unorthodox architectural drawings and plans that he called “polydimensional” were somewhat akin to Surrealist automatic drawings.

André Masson, Battle of Fishes, 1926
Surrealism
-automatic drawing
Masson made Battle of Fishes by freely applying gesso to areas of the canvas, throwing sand on it, then brushing away the excess. The resulting contours suggested forms “although almost always irrational ones,” according to the artist around which he rapidly sketched and applied paint directly from the tube. The image that emerged suggests a savage underwater battle between sharp–toothed fish. Masson, who was physically and spiritually wounded during World War I, joined the Surrealist group in 1924. He believed that, if left to chance, pictorial compositions would reveal the sadism of all living creatures.

Robert Rauschenberg, Bed, 1955
The Museum of Modern Art, New York

Morris Louis, Beta Kappa, 1961 (Veil series)
Abstract Expressionism: Color Field Painting
In 1948, he pioneered the use of Magna paint - a newly developed oil based acrylic paint made for him by his friends, New York City paintmakers Leonard Bocour and Sam Golden. In 1952, Louis moved to Washington, D.C.. Living in Washington, D.C., he was somewhat apart from the New York scene and he was working almost in isolation. During the 1950s he and a group of artists that included Kenneth Noland, Gene Davis, Tom Downing, Howard Mehring Anne Truitt and Hilda Thorpe among others were central to the development of Color Field painting. The basic point about Louis’s work and that of other Color Field painters, sometimes known as the Washington Color School in contrast to most of the other new approaches of the late 1950s and early 1960s, is that they greatly simplified the idea of what constitutes the look of a finished painting. They continued in a tradition of painting exemplified by Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman, Clyfford Still, Mark Rothko, Robert Motherwell, and Ad Reinhardt. Eliminating gestural, compositional drawing in favor of large areas of raw canvas, solid planes of thinned and fluid paint, utilizing an expressive and psychological use of flat, and intense color and allover, repetitive composition. One of Louis’s most important series of Color Field paintings were his Unfurleds
Louis and Noland visited Helen Frankenthaler’s New York studio, where they saw and were greatly impressed by her stain paintings especially Mountains and Sea (1952). Upon their return to Washington, Louis and Noland together experimented with various techniques of paint application. Louis characteristically applied extremely diluted, thinned paint to an unprimed, unstretched canvas, allowing it to flow over the inclined surface in effects sometimes suggestive of translucent color veils. The importance of Frankenthaler’s example in Louis’s development of this technique has been noted.[1] Louis reported that he thought of Frankenthaler as the bridge between Jackson Pollock and the possible. However, even more so than Frankenthaler, Louis eliminated the brush gesture, although his flat, thin pigment is at times modulated in billowing and subtle tones.
In 1954, Louis produced his mature Veil Paintings, which were characterized by overlapping, superimposed layers of transparent color poured onto and stained into sized or unsized canvas.[2] The Veil Paintings consist of waves of brilliant, curving color-shapes submerged in translucent washes through which separate colors emerge principally at the edges. Although subdued, the resulting color is immensely rich. In another series, the artist used long parallel bands and stripes of pure color arranged side by side in rainbow effects.
Louis destroyed many of his paintings between 1955 and 1957. He resumed work on the Veils in 1958–59. These were followed by Florals and Columns (1960), Unfurleds (1960–61)—in which rivulets of more opaque, intense color flow from both sides of large white fields of raw canvas—and finally the Stripe paintings (1961–62). Between summer 1960 and January/February 1961, he created about 150 Unfurleds, generally on mural-size canvases.

Chuck Close
Big Self‐portrait, 1968
Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Photorealism
Although his later paintings differ in method from his earlier canvases, the preliminary process remains the same. To create his grid work copies of photos, Close puts a grid on the photo and on the canvas and copies cell by cell. Typically, each square within the grid is filled with roughly executed regions of color (usually consisting of painted rings on a contrasting background) which give the cell a perceived ‘average’ hue which makes sense from a distance. His first tools for this included an airbrush, rags, razor blade, and an eraser mounted on a power drill. His first picture with this method was Big Self Portrait, a black and white enlargement of his face to a 107.5 in by 83.5 in (2.73 m by 2.12 m) canvas, made in over four months in 1968, and acquired by the Walker Art Center in 1969. He made seven more black and white portraits during this period. He has been quoted as saying that he used such diluted paint in the airbrush that all eight of the paintings were made with a single tube of mars black acrylic.

Wols, Bird, 1949
The Menil Collection, Houston

Archibald Motley, Jr.
Black Belt, 1934
Hampton University Museum, Hampton, Virginia

Yves Klein, Blue Monochrome, 1961
The Museum of Modern Art, New York

Sonia Delaunay, Blanket, 1911

Mikhail Larionov, Blue Rayonism, 1912

George Bellows
Both Members of This Club
1909
National Gallery of Art, Washington, D. C.

Lynda Benglis, Bounce, 1969

Piet Mondrian, Broadway Boogie‐Woogie,
1942‐43





























































































































































































































