Paper 1 - Attachment - Types of attachment and cultural variations Flashcards

1
Q

What research method was used by Ainsworth in the Strange Situation?

Bonus - strengths of this method?

A

Controlled observation

Strengths - objective behaviour categories and high inter-observer reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the behaviour categories being observed in the Strange Situation?

4 in total

A
  1. Willingness to explore (safe base)
  2. Separation anxiety
  3. Stranger anxiety
  4. Reuinion behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How would a secure child behave in the strange situation?

A
  1. Willing to explore (use mother as safe base)
  2. Moderate separation anxiety (easy to soothe)
  3. Moderate stranger anxiety (easy to soothe)
  4. Joy on reunion (enthusiastic)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How would an insecure-resistant child behave in the strange situation?

A
  1. Not willing to explore (clingy)
  2. High separation anxiety (not easy to soothe)
  3. High stranger anxiety (not easy to soothe)
  4. Seek and reject (ambiguous)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How would an insecure-avoidant child behave in the strange situation?

A
  1. Willing to explore
  2. Low separation anxiety
  3. Low stranger anxiety
  4. Avoids contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the % findings for different attachment types in Ainsworth’s Strange Situation?

A
  1. Secure - 60-75%
  2. Insecure-avoidant - 20-25%
  3. Insecure-resistant - 3-12%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evalaute types of attachment (Ainsworth’s Strange Situation)

A

:) High inter-observer realibility (94%)
:( Fourth attacment type not considered - insecure-disorgansed
:( Genetic temperament - confounding variable
:( Cultural bias - SS as an imposed etic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who studied cultural variations of attachment?

They are named on the spec so you need to know!

A

Van Izjendoorn
(and Kroonenberg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What research method was used to investigate cultural variations in attachment?

A

Meta-analysis

Secondary research of existing studies with an effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many participants and studies were in Van Ijzendoorns research?

A
  • 32 studies of 8 countries
  • 1,990 pps (or almost 2,000)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the key findings from Van Ijzendoorns research?

Hint - 4 in total

A
  • 150% variation within cultures than between
  • All countries most common secure
  • Japan higher % of insecure-resistant (rarely separated)
  • Germany higher % of insecure-avoidance (promote independence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate research into cultural variations in attachment

A

:( Imposed etic using SS to measure universally
:( Lack of temporal validity - 2014 Italian study higher avoidant and lower secure - working mothers and childcare
:) Strengths of meta-analysis, large sample, external validity
:( Countries not cultures - urban areas vs. rural areas. Confounding variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly