Paper 1 Cases Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

case for voluntary act

A

Hill v Baxter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

case for ommision duty to act

A

R v Gibbins +Proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

case for ommision assumed duty

A

R v Stone + Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

case for ommision public duty to act

A

R v Dytham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case for ommision contractual duty

A

R v Pittwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

case for state of affairs

A

Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

case for concidence rule

A

Fagan v Met Police 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

case for factual causation

A

R v Pagett 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

case for thin skull rule

A

R v Blave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

case for act of a third party

A

R v Smith 1959

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

case for victims own act

A

R v Roberts 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

case for oblique intent

A

R v Woolin 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

case for subjective recklessness

A

R v Cummingham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

case for reasonable creatures in being

A

attorney general 1997
law reform act 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cases for mens rea of murder

A

1/ Vickers 1957
2/Cunningham 1981
3/ Moloney 1985
4/ Woolin 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cases for qualifying trigger

A

R v Ward 2012
R v Bowyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

case for abnormality of mental functioning

A

Bryne (1960)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

case for intoxication efffect on dimished responsibilty

A

wood (2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

case for must be an unlawful act

20
Q

case for gross negligence duty of care

21
Q

case for must be in order to steal (robbery)

A

cocorcan v anderton 1980

22
Q

case for outlining that amount of force need not be large in robbery

A

dawson v james 1976 confimred by Cloudon 1987

23
Q

case for even seeking to cause fear is enough (robbery)

24
Q

case for force immediately or at the time (robbery)

A

Hale 1979—-Lockley 1995

25
case for effective entry Bulgary
Brown 1985
26
case for partial entry bulgary
Ryan 1996
27
case for includes vechile or vessel (bulgary)
Leathley 1979
28
case for part of buiding witghout permission (bulgary)
Jones + Smith 1979
29
(theft) case for appropiation
Vindall 2011
30
(theft) case for property action in being
Kohn 1979
31
(theft) case for belonging to another
Woodman 1974 Turner 1971
32
(theft) case for belonging to another abandoned
Bunnett 1974
33
(theft) case for dishonesty that outlined test
Ghosh 1982
34
(theft) case for intent to permanently deprive
Lavendar 1994
35
(theft) case forintent to permanently deprive borrowed
Velumyl 1989
36
(assault) case for apprehend
Smith v Superintendent of woking police
37
(assault) case for that outlined joking is irrelvent
logdon v DPP
38
(ABH) case for assault element
DPP v Taylor
39
(ABH) case for factual causation
R v White
40
(ABH) case for legal causation
R v Smith
41
(ABH) case for ABH
R v Donovan
42
(ABH) case for the fact it can be psychiatric
R v Chan Fook
43
(ABH) case for mens rea
R v Roberts
44
(GBH) case for wound
Brookes 1834
45
(GBH) case for GBH
DPP v Smith
46
(GBH) case for s18 mens rea
R v Belfon