Paper 1.16b - Duress by Threat Flashcards

(13 cards)

1
Q

Is duress by threats a full or a partial defence?

A

Full defence, results in an acquittal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is duress by threats? What case defined it?

A

D is forced to commit a crime due to another person threatening death/GBH.
AG Whelan
“Threats of immediate death or serious personal violence are so great that they overbear the ordinary powers of human resistance.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 6 elements of duress by threats?

A
  1. Who is the threat to?
  2. Is it serious?
  3. Is there a nexus between crime and threat?
  4. Is it immediate?
  5. Does it satisfy the Graham test?
  6. Are there limiting factors?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When using the defence of duress by threats, who can the threat be to/not be to?

A

D or others, not property or animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In duress by threats, a threat has to be made against d or others. What is meant by others and which case defines this?

A

Others means people close to d in proximity or relation.
Wright
D and her boyfriend had been threatened, CA awarded the defence despite not being family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In duress by threats, what constitutes a serious threat? What case defines this?

A

The threat must be of death or serious injury.
Valderama-Vega.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In duress by threats, there must be a nexus (connection) between the threat and the crime. What is the case study of this?

A

Cole
D was threatened to get money for his debts. D did two robberies to get the money. Although d was under duress, they had not told him to rob the banks, so D was convicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In duress by threats, the threat must be immediate. What is the case study of this?

A

Hasan - if d has time to go to the police, they must do so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In terms of duress by threats, what is the 2 part Graham test?

A

Subjective - Did d act because he feared death or serious injury?
Objective - Would a sober person of reasonable firmness with d’s characteristics have acted in the same way?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The duress by threats Graham test mentions how “d’s characteristics” are relevant. According to Bowen, what 5 five characteristics are relevant?

A

Age.
Pregnancy.
Serious physical injury / disability.
Recognised illness.
Gender.
NOT LOW IQ OR BEING TIMID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two limitations to the defence of duress by threats?

A

Self-induced duress is likely to spoil the defence eg joining a gang.
No defence to murder or attempted murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In duress by threats, D has no defence if he foresees or should foresee that there is a risk of threat. What case decides this?

A

Hasan or Sharp.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What two cases decided that duress by threats is not applicable to murder and attempted murder respectively?

A

Howe (binding for murder, persuasive for attempted) and Gotts (binding for attempted murder).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly