Parol Evidence

Question 1

When was the outside term supposedly agreed upon

Answer 1

Outside written terms are considered parole evidence when they are introducted prior to contract formation. 2-202. Outside oral terms are considered parole evidence when they are introduced prior to and during contract formation. There are three ways a terms can possess legal significance in a contract. (1) terms prior to the contract (2) terms added during contract formation (3) terms added after contract formation.

Question 2

A

Answer 2

Here, TERM were introduced prior/during/after to the formation i.e., time before/during/after mutual assent and coniserdation because [facts] as evident by [”” quoted facts” ampliecation of facts

Question 3

What will parole evidence have on the integrated term.

Answer 3

The ability to introduce an outside term depends on the effect it will have on the contract. Outside terms contradict when it directly conflicts the intergrated terms of the contract. An term adds something when it brings something new to the intergrated term, consider it supplementation. Outside terms that explain clarify any ambiguities that otherwise was not expressly clear withing the intergrated agreement

Question 4

c

Answer 4

Having determine that the outside term will contrdict/add/explain the intergrated agreement. I will now determine if the contract has been full or partially intergrated

Question 5

Contradict NO

Answer 5

Outside terms which contradic may never be introduced within an intergrated agreement