Part 1: Classical/Pavlovian Conditioning Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

Who studied the laws of association?

A

Pavlov and Ebbinghaus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Primary rules of association (3)

A
  1. Continuity
  2. Similarity
  3. Contrast
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Learning

A

An enduring change in mechanisms of behaviour involving specific stimuli/responses that result from prior experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 R’s of Animal Research

A

Replacement (of animals with other techniques)
Refinement (of methods to cause less suffering)
Reducing (# of animals used)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dualism (Theory)

A

view of voluntary behaviour being attributed to the mind and involuntary behaviour being attributed to reflexes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Empiricism (Locke)

A

ideas in the mind come from past experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hedonism (Hobbes)

A

actions are determined by pursuit of pleasure or avoidance of pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nativism (Descartes)

A

humans are born with innate ideas and abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Nervism (Pavlov)

A

behavioural and physiological processes are regulated by the nervous system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Elicited Behaviours

A

occur in reaction to specific external stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 Events in a reflex

A
  1. Eliciting stimulus
  2. Corresponding elicited response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reflex Arc Pathway

A

Afferent/sensory neuron - interneuron - efferent/motor neuron

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Modal Action Patterns (MAPS)

A

response patient exhibited by all members of a species (reflexive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sign/Releasing Stimulus

A

specific feature of an object/animal that elicits an MAP/reflex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Supernormal Stimulus

A

artificially enhanced sign stimulus used to produce larger than average MAP (ex. adding sugar to food)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Foraging Response Sequence

A
  1. General search (non-directive)
  2. Focal search (directive)
  3. Food handling and ingestion mode (consummatory)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Habituation effect

A

progressive decline in vigor of elicited behaviour after repeated pairing; stimulus specific
ex. drug tolerance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sensitization effect

A

progressive increase in vigor of elicited behaviour after repeated pairing with aversive stimuli; less stimuli specific
ex. fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Sensory Adaption

A

temporary decline is sensitivity of sense organ due to fatigue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Where does fatigue occur?

A

muscle tissue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Where does sensory adaption occur?

A

sense organs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Dual-Process Theory (Hab. & Sen.)

A

Habituation process and sensitization process are underlying neural processes used to adapt responsiveness to stimulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

S-R System (Dual-Process)

A

shortest neural pathway; sense organs - muscles
Habituation occurs here

23
Q

State system (dual-process)

A

neural structures that determine level of arousal/responsiveness
Sensitization occurs here

24
Opponent-Process Theory (Motivation)
Emotion arousing stimuli trigger the A/Primary process (emotional response) which then triggers the compensatory B/Opponent process (opposite emotional response)
25
Object Learning
association of 2 features of the same object (ex. colour and taste)
26
Fear Conditioning
Pairs an aversive US (shock) with a CS (light or tone) to elicit fear response
27
Measures for Fear Conditioning
- Freezing behaviour - Conditioned suppression
28
Autoshaping/Sign Tracking Paradigm
movement towards stimulus that signals incoming positive reinforcer
29
Goal Tracking
CS elicits movement to US drop off location instead of CS itself
30
Evaluative Conditioning
changing the perceived value of an initially neutral stimulus by pairing it with a liked/disliked stimulus
31
Pseudo Conditioning
exposure to the US is sufficient to create CR-like responses to the CS
32
Random Control Procedure
CS and US are presented randomly
33
Explicitly Unpaired Control
CS and US are presented with enough time between them to prevent association from occurring
34
Temporal Coding Hypothesis
Classical conditioning involves not only learning WHAT to expect but also WHEN to expect it (in relation to the CS)
35
Inhibitory Conditioning
Learning to Predict the ABSENCE of the US (CS predicts absence of US) - Excitatory conditioning must occur first
36
Conditioned Inhibition (Inhibitory Conditioning)
Trial 1: Excitatory (traditional trial) Trial 2: A second CS (CS-) is paired with the initial CS, and US does not occur (CS- is now associated with lack of US)
37
Negative CS-US Contingency/Correlation (Inhibitory Conditioning)
Done in one trial type where CS signals absence of US more often than it signals its presence
38
Compound Stimulus/Summation Test (Testing Inhibition)
A stimulus is a conditioned inhibitor if it reduces responding to a previously conditioned excitatory stimulus
39
Retardation of Acquisition Test (Testing Inhibition)
A stimulus is a conditioned inhibitor if it is slower to become a conditioned excitor than a neutral stimulus
40
Latent Inhibition/CS Pre-exposure Effect
interference with conditioning due to repeated exposure to CS before trial
41
US Pre-exposure Effect
interference with conditioning due to repeated exposure to US before trial
42
Stimulus Salience
Significance/noticeability of stimulus
43
Higher-Order Conditioning (no US)
Previously conditioned stimulus (CS1) is used to condition a new stimulus (CS2) EX. Dog attack (US) = scared of dogs - Sees pack of dogs at the park, becomes afraid of the park (CS2)
44
Sensory Preconditioning (no US)
pairing of two weak stimuli (CS1 + CS2), if CS1 is paired with a US, CS2 will elicit the same response when paired with the same US ex: vanilla and cinnamon are associated
45
Stimulus Substitution Model
Idea that classical conditioning results in participants responding to the CS in the same way as the US; CS essentially "substitutes" US - Emphasized CR dependence on US
46
Behaviour Systems Model
Assumes presentation of a US activates the behaviour system relevant to that US (ex. food = foraging and feeding system)
47
US Devaluation (Evidence for S-S Learning)
Reduction of attractiveness of US Phase 1: exp. and control groups are classically conditioned Phase 2: exp. group's US is devalued (through aversion conditioning) - US devaluation reduces response to CS, suggesting S-S learning
48
Conditioned Diminution of UR
Reduction of magnitude of response to US due to presentation of CS that was conditioned with that US
49
Conditioned Compensatory Response (Drug Tolerance)
conditioned response opposite to original reaction elicited by US (compensatory)
50
Blocking Effect
Interference with conditioning of a new/novel stimulus due to the presence of a previously conditioned stimulus - EX; if you get sick from grandmas pudding every time and learn to dislike it, her adding a sauce once will not cause you to dislike the sauce (you know it is the pudding that makes you sick)
51
Blocking Effect Procedure
Phase 1: Exp. group pairs stimulus A with US; control group just gets stimulus A (unpaired) Phase 2: Both groups are presented A and B simultaneously and pair A+B to US Test: Presented with B alone, exp. group will show less conditioning to B, it was blocked by A - US must be unexpected for conditioning to occur
52
Rescorla-Wagner Model
Mathematical formula for strength of association (V=association strength, Delta=change)
53
Pierce-Hall Attentional Model
Suprisingness of the US in previous trials determines amount of attention paid to CS in next trial
54
Relative-Waiting-Time Hypothesis
idea that conditioned responding is dependant on how long the organism must wait for US after CS vs. how long they would have to wait for US regardless
55
Extinction
reduction of learned response that occurs because CS is no longer paired with US, or repeated presentation of CS without CS