Part 3 Flashcards
Voluntary exchange:
Transactions build upon principle of consensus [legitimacy]
▪ Voluntary participation in exchange transaction expresses the participants’ consent
▪ Voluntary exchange aims at mutual betterment [realization of win-win situation] and is fully compatible with
pluralist values and diversity
▪ Self-determination without the use of force
Business context:
Organization of voluntary win-win-win-relations, companies have relations with employees, costumers, suppliers, investors if both parties are consent and better off than before
Ballot of the market:
mention economist related
Democracy and consumer sovereignty in the market [Ludwig von Mises]
▪ The consumers by their buying and abstention from buying elect the entrepreneurs in a daily repeated plebiscite as it were, they determine who should own and who not, and how much each owner should own
▪ The ballot of the market elevates those who in the immediate past have best served the consumers, choice is alterable and can daily be corrected, the elected who disappoints electorate is speedily reduced to the ranks
Democracy in the state:
▪ Voting with your ballot sheet ▪ Vote just on election day ▪ Vote on few/collectively important decisions ▪ Majority can overrule minority ▪ Votes may have no impact ▪ One human one vote
Democracy in the market
▪ Voting with your feet
▪ Daily vote with every market choice
▪ Vote on many detailed decisions of individual relevance
▪ Bilateral consensual relationship
▪ Each single transaction counts
▪ Voting with one’s purse only possible with resources
Bilateral Exchange
Buyer and seller of a T-Shirt [Mixed motive game]
▪ Shared interest in a deal to realize betterment through exchange
▪ Conflicting interests = price, quality, service/effort, time of payment, production costs & working conditions`
Exchange is at risk due to a potential social dilemma:
everyone is tempted to take without (fully) giving.
Two solutions:
! Property Rights & Rule of Law: Courts (or other third parties) sanction contracts
! Competition: Competition as an instrument to discipline market participants (especially when incomplete contracts are not easily enforced)
Is cooperation in the market always good?
[Adam Smith] = skeptical of certain forms of cooperation
Do we need more competition or more cooperation?
Competition and cooperation are not necessarily opposites, we can use cooperation to compete but also use competition to cooperate more effectively
Normative Ambivalence:
many issues/things are ambivalent: Depending on
context, they can show very different faces and may lead to important negative effects in one instance and positive effects in another.
Competitive Pressure:
[William Baumol]
▪ Competition creates incentives that can ultimately reduce certain individual options
▪ The competitive process precludes voluntarism on any significant scale
▪ Competition can enforce behavior conforming the dominant incentives
Negative outcomes of competition:
▪ Competition can lead to unintended negative consequences [sports > doping; politics > populism; business >
pollution, corruption, poor labor conditions]
▪ Race to the bottom = competition reduces the scope for morally desirable behavior = competition can create
incentives that make morally desirable behavior almost impossible
▪ Competition as social dilemma, e.g., pollution = all companies pollute environment to gain competitive
advantage but no company actually gets advantage because all pollute
Positive outcomes of competition:
▪ The case of negative discrimination = manager would like to decide according to personal values [discriminate
against talented applicant because of XY] but competition tolerates no business deviation from virtue
▪ Race to the top = unintended outcome = competition reduces scope for morally undesirable behavior =
competition can create incentives that make morally undesirable behavior almost impossible
Competition as ambivalent tool:
▪ Depending on the institutional framework, competition can advance and undermine moral behavior
▪ Competition detaches individual intentions from collective outcomes in the market
▪ The moral quality of market outcomes does not depend primarily on individual character but on the quality of
the rules of the game
The systematic locus of morality in competitive markets
[Mention person related]
[Karl Homann]
Under competitive conditions, the institutional framework emerges as the systematic locus for morality
▪ Not only place for morality but whenever moral problems are caused systematically by the competitive logic, then the only systematic solution is to change this logic
▪ A naïve appeal to individual heroism risks that the morally sensitive will be driven out of the market
▪ No justification for undesirable status quo but a perspective for democratic reform
Competition and morality according to whom?
[William Baumol]
Competition reduces societal dependence on individual good will = society can seek to reform institutional rules of the game which is better than to reform people individually
A market exchange dilemma can be solved by property rights.
TRUE OR FALSE?
TRUE
An exchange is destabilized when third parties use their right to sanction (in the form of contracts).
TRUE OR FALSE?
FALSE
Competition can be used as a disciplinary tool so that the parties keep their promise to exchange.
TRUE OR FALSE?
TRUE
Competition as an instrument limits the freedom of choice for those involved in an exchange.
TRUE OR FALSE?
FALSE
Setting property rights is often associated with additional costs and increased effort for those involved.
TRUE OR FALSE?
TRUE
Perfect competition is also called…
The quantity offered and the associated price result from….
With this type of market, welfare for those involved is…
…POLYPOLY
…the interplay of supply and demand
…maximal
The difference between the price the consumer would be willing to pay and the market price is called….
consumer surplus
The difference between the market price and the price at which the seller would be willing to manufacture and offer a good…
producer surplus