Part A--Formation, Battle of Forms, SoF, etc. Flashcards

1
Q

Statute of Fraud Categories

A

MYLEGS500
-Consideration of Marriage
-Will not be completed w/in 1 year (from date of formation)(exception–employment contracts)
-Contract for sale of interest in land (exception–present conveyance, short term leases, contracts to lease, partial performance)
-Contract of executor/administrator to answer for duty of decedent
-Contract of guarantee or suretyship (i.e. promise to answer for debt to 3d party)(exception–main purpose exception, and creditor discharges original debtor on faith of guarantee )
-Sale of goods $500 or more (UCC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main purpose exception

A

Exception to SoF writing req. for guarantors/promise to answer for debt of third party

-If main purpose protect/promote own econ. interests–can be oral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contract for future sale vs. present conveyance of land

A

Key difference–present conveyance not covered by SoF
-SoF takes “contract for sale” literally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Exception to L SoF

A

Sale of interest in land exception–short term leases for year or less, contracts to lease
-If year or more–need writing (see year req.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Exception to G SoF

A

Guarantee/suretyship (agreement to answer for debt of third party) exceptions

1) Creditor discharges original debtor from oblig. to pay based on guarantee of third party
2) Main purpose exception–if main purpose (“leading object”) to protect promote guarantor’s own econ. interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exception to L SoF

A

Sale of interest in land exceptions
1) Present conveyance (v. contract to sell)
2) Short-term lease/contract to lease (w/in one year)
3) Partial performance–Partial payment AND entrance into land OR made improvements–idea is reliance that cannot be remedied by $$
4) Promissory estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statute of Frauds general rule

A

If the Statute of Frauds applies, then an oral contract is unenforceable except when the agreement is written/memorialized in a writing signed by party against whom enforcement is sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common law SoF Writing requirement

A

1) Writing
2) Signed by party against whom enforcement is sought
3) containing: a) ID of parties; b) nature and subject matter; and c) essential terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tacking together signed + unsigned (not incorp. by reference) docs under SoF

A

Need:
1) One signed writing unambig. establishes contract relationship
2) Signed + unsigned docs clearly refer to same subject AND
3) Clear and convincing evidence of acquiescence to unsigned docs by party being sued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Signature under SoF

A

Anything intended to authenticate the doc. (ex. initials, typed sig., letterhead, most states–elect. sig.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Part performance enforcement for land only applies if

A

Action by buyer v. seller
Action for specific performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Restitution

A

Recover value of benefits conferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Quantum meruit

A

Recover reasonable value of services rendered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Part performance + 1 year contract

A

Not valid–but full performance = enforceable, might get quantum meruit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Promissory estoppel + SoF

A

Some jx impose stiffer reqs vs. ordinary promissory estoppel–still need same reqs. but look at
CL
1)nature of reliance + relationship to remedy
2) corroboration of reliance by terms of contract
3) evid. of contract existence/terms

UCC–sometimes need to show unconscionable injury, unjust enrichment

Exception to stiffer reqs–general (i.e. construction) contractors almost always allow p. estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common law v. UCC Statute of Frauds

A

Common law–marriage, year or more, sale of interest in land, executor’s personal promise re: decedent, guarantor promise to debt of 3d party

UCC–goods of $500 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Writing req. under UCC Statute of Frauds

A

1) Writing
2) Signed by party against whom enforcement sought
3) “sufficient to indicate a contract for sale has been made”
4) Quantity of goods (+ only enforceable to that extent, even if wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Quantity under UCC SoF

A

Required for enforceability (up to amount listed)
-Can use other language in contract IF provide “unambig.” basis for quality
-Output/requirements contracts + expression of “output” “requirements” or equiv. = OK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ways to satisfy UCC SoF

A

1)Signed writing
2)Merchant’s confirmation
3) In court admission
4) Part performance (if divisible only up to amount/payment received and accepted)
5) Substantial reliance by seller of specially manufactured items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Merchant Confirmation

A

Confirmation of oral agreement IF
1) Both merchants
2) “Sufficient v. sender”
3) “confirmation of contract”
4) w/in “reasonable time
5) receiving merchant has “reason to know” of contents (ex. not lost in mail)
UNLESS
1) written notice of objection w/in 10 days (Notice can also be a merchant confirmation + binding if meets above–ex. “please send the remaining 200”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Part Performance under UCC SoF

A

1) actions of both parties indicating contract exists AND
2) payment or goods received and accepted (indivisible = partial payment enough for whole contract, divisible = only amt paid/accepted)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Substantial Reliance SoF UCC Exception

A

Seller can enforce oral SoF contract if

1) Goods specially manufactured for buyer
2) Not suitable for sale in ordinary course of business
3) Seller sub. begun making goods or made commitments to get
4) Circumstances r. indicate the actions/ goods for buyer AND
5) Actions occurred before received notice of revocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Revocation of Unilateral Contract

A

Irrevocable once performance has begun (majority rule)
Preparation does not count–offeror can revoke
(Min disfavored rule–only irrevocable once performance complete)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Types of Contract Law

A

1) UCC–re: sale of goods
2) Common law–re: services

25
UCC definition of goods
Any "movable item"
26
Hybrid Contract types (for goods *and* services)
**Majority**: **predominant purpose** Look at: 1) **Language of contract** 2) **Nature of supplier's business** 3) **Rel value** of **goods v services** **Minority**: **partition** contract--goods use UCC, service uses CL Goods incidental = CL Services incidental = UCC
27
Offer Elements
1) **Outward manifestation** AND 2) **Signal** that **acceptance will seal deal** Key--is offeror **willing to commit w/out further assent** if accepted?
28
Termination of Power of Acceptance
1) Lapse of Time 2) Death/Incapacity of Either Party 3) Revocation by Offeror 4) Rejection by Offeree
29
Termination through lapse of time
Can be time stated in offer If not specified--r. time
30
Face to Face Conversation Rule
Offer made face-to-face = ordinarily deemed to be only open till close of conversation, unless evidence otherwise
31
Revocation By Offeror
General rule--free to revoke at any time, if 1) Prior to acceptance AND 2) Effectively communicated Can be direct OR indirect (learned from 3d party) Exception: enforceable/non-revocable options contract/offer
32
Direct Revocation
Offeror communicates revocation directly w/ offeree
33
Indirect Revocation
Offeree learns of offeror's intention to abandon from **third party source** Effective IF 1) **Definitive action inconsistent w/ keeping offer open** AND 2) Offeree **acquires *reliable* info** re: action from **3d party source**
34
Revocation by Advertisement/General Notice
2d RST-OK if 1) Communicated by ad or general notice that is functional equiv. AND 2) **No better means r. available**
35
Mirror Image Rule (CL)
**CL rule**--unless **Acceptance mirrors terms** = **rejection + counteroffer**
36
Mirror Image (UCC)
Does not exist under UCC If **acceptance does not match offer/adds terms** **Non-material** = **part** of contract, unless explicitly stated **Material or conflicting** = knock out
37
Enforceable Options Contract (CL Majority)
MUST HAVE 1) **Offer** AND 2) **Subsidiary promise** to **keep offer open** AND 3) **Valid mech for sec. enforcement** (almost always **consideration**) Promissory estoppel--foreseeable + r. reliance, + injustice if not enforced
38
Enforceable Options Contract (CL Minority)
Can **prevent revocation of offer** IF OFFER 1) **In writing + signed** by **offeror** AND 2) **Recites consideration** for **promise to keep open** AND 3) **Proposes exchange on fair terms w/in r. time** Promissory estoppel--foreseeable + r. reliance, + injustice if not enforced
39
Firm Offer Rule (UCC)
Can make **irrevocable** offer **without consideration** IF 1) Made by **merchant** AND 2) In **writing signed by merchant** AND 3) Offer **expressly states will be held open** AND UCC only--NOT CL CANNOT be longer than **3 months** UNLESS **also meets** reqs of **CL options contract**
40
Offers + Construction Contracts
Generally--if **gen. contractor uses subcontractor bid to formulate own** bid = **implied option contract** via **promissory estoppel** Idea---reliance, can't revoke even though no consideration
41
Merchant (UCC)
Party with **special knowledge or skill** re: **practices** OR **goods** of transaction Still merchant if **only have knowledge re: goods, or vice versa**
42
Bilateral Contract
Offer looking for promise to do x Promise to perform = acceptance
43
Unilateral Contract
Offer looking for performance Can **only accept** via **performance** Even if abandon partway--gen. not liable, b/cause not accepted Pretty rare: gen **reward offers** + **real estate brokerage** agreements
44
Acceptance (CL)
1) Mirror Image Rule--must mirror terms of offer 2) Communicated to offeror No method specified = **any r. means** IF 1) Means **used by offeror** OR 2) Means **customarily used** in **sim transactions** OR 3) Means **equivalent in expeditiousness + reliability** to means used by offeror
45
Acceptance by Silence
Default no--but 3 exceptions 1) **Takes benefit of services** w/ **r. opp to reject** and **reason to know offeror's intent** OR 2) Offeror gives **reason to believe silence = acceptance** AND offeree **intends to accept** via silence OR 3) Because of **previous dealings, etc** it is **r.** that offeree will **only notify if *not* accepting** (binding EVEN IF no intent to accept)
46
Crossed Offers/Offers Passing in the Night
Need meeting of minds to form contract--so if two offers fly/are mailed past each other--even if same terms, no contract
47
Acceptance of Offer (UCC)
1) Promise to ship goods in conformity (ex. acknowledgement of order form) 2) Prompt or current shipment of goods in conformity 3) Shipment of nonconforming goods (but *also* breach)
48
Exception to Mailbox Rule
If mail **rejection first** and THEN mail **acceptance **= **whichever reaches offeror first** determines result
49
Battle of the Forms (CL)
Perfect tender rule--if acceptance's terms do not match offer's terms (ex. new or contradicting clauses--> no contract
50
Battle of the Forms (UCC Consumer)
If acceptance contains **additional or different terms** --> terms are **proposals for addition** NOT part of contract UNLESS **offeror expressly agrees
51
Battle of the Forms (UCC Merchants)
**Additional** terms = **incorp into contract** UNLESS 1) **offer expressly limits acceptance** to terms OR 2) Offeror **object w/in r. time** OR 3) **Materially alter** contract **Different/contradicting** = **knockout rule---invalid**
52
Sec. 2-207--Material Alterations
Q-- would it result in **surprise/hardship** if **incorporated w/out express awareness** of other party Ex. -Negate standard warranties -Materially shorter period for complaints -**Vary trade usage/course of dealing** in sig. way
53
Written Confirmation with Different Terms
V. similar to Battle of Forms Consumer = **proposal for addition**--N/A unless accepted Merchants = additional terms added UNLESS a) materially alter OR b) objection w/in r. time Conflicting terms--knockout
54
Conditional Acceptance
Acceptance that is **conditioned on agreement to added/different terms** Majority--if language re: material change clear and conspicuous--> conditional acceptance Minority--must explicitly say won't do business unless accept terms
55
Contracts Formed By Conduct (UCC)
If **act like have contract** but no writing = can still estab. contract (but see SoF)
56
Approaches to Consideration
**Majority** = **bargained-for exchange** **Minority** = **benefit/detriment test** Minority test--is promisee *giving up something had legal rt to do/not to do?*
57
Gratuitous Transfer
Legally binding gift if 1) **Deliver gift** AND 2) **Intent to bestow gift**
58
Moral Consideration
AKA past consideration (ex. "you saved my life--I'll give you 1K!") Majority--not valid consideration Minority--valid if 1) Past benefit was conferred on promisor (vs. 3d party) AND 2) Benefit material
59
Promissory Estoppel
1) **Promise** AND 2) **Foreseeable Reliance** AND 4) **Actually Relied** AND 5) **Injustice w/out Enforcement**