Part II Flashcards
(126 cards)
Art. 35
Suspension and/or Cancellation of License or Authority. The Minister of Labor shall have the power to suspend or cancel any license or authority to recruit employees for overseas employment for violation of rules and regulations issued by the Ministry of Labor, the Overseas Employment Development Board, or for violation of the provisions of this and other applicable laws, General Orders and Letters of Instructions.
Non-licensee or non-holder of authority
Any person, corporation or entity which has not been issued a valid license or authority to engage in recruitment and placement by the Secretary of Labor, or whose license or authority has been suspended, revoked or cancelled by the POEA or the Secretary.
Who can suspend or cancel the license
- DOLE Secretary
2. POEA Administrator
The power to suspend or cancel any license or authority to recruit employees for overseas employment is ______ vested with the POEA and the Secretary of Labor.
concurrently
Prohibited acts under Art. 34
It shall be unlawful for any individual, entity, licensee, or holder of authority:
a. to charge or accept, directly or indirectly, any amount greater than that specified in the schedule of allowable fees prescribed by the Secretary of Labor, or to make a worker pay any amount greater than that actually received by him as a loan or advance
b. to furnish or publish any false notice or information or document in relation to recruitment or employment
c. to give any false notice, testimony, information or document or commit any act of misrepresentation for the purpose of securing a license or authority under this Code
d. to induce or attempt to induce a worker already employed to quit his employment in order to offer him to another unless the transfer is designed to liberate the worker from oppressive terms and conditions of employment
e. to influence or to attempt to influence any person or entity not to employ any worker who has not applied for employment through his agency
f. to engage in the recruitment or placement of workers in jobs harmful to public health or morality or to the dignity of the Republic of the Philippines
g. to obstruct or attempt to obstruct inspection by the Secretary of Labor or by his duly authorized representatives
h. to fail to file reports on the status of employment, placement vacancies, remittance of foreign exchange earnings, separation from jobs, departures and such other matters or information as may be required by the Secretary of Labor
i. to substitute or alter employment contracts approved and verified by the Department of Labor from the time of actual signing thereof by the parties up to and including the periods of expiration of the same without the approval of the Secretary of Labor
j. to become an officer or member of the Board of any corporation engaged in travel agency or to be engaged directly or indirectly in the management of a travel agency
k. to withhold or deny travel documents from applicant workers before departure for monetary or financial considerations other than those authorized under this Code and its implementing rules and regulations
Regulatory and visitorial powers of the DOLE Secretary
Regulatory
- to restrict and regulate recruitment and placement activities of all agencies
- agencies within the coverage of this Title
- to issue orders and promulgate rules and regulations to carry out the objectives and implement the provisions of this Title
Visitorial
- power to inspect the premises, books of accounts and records of any person or entity covered by this Title
- can require agencies to submit reports regularly on prescribed forms
- can act on violations of any provisions of this Title
Art. 36
The Secretary of Labor shall have the power to restrict and regulate the recruitment and placement activities of all agencies within the coverage of this Title and is hereby authorized to issue orders and promulgate rules and regulations to carry out the objectives and implement the provisions of this Title.
Art. 37
The Secretary of Labor or his duly authorized representatives may, at any time, inspect the premises, books of accounts and records of any person or entity covered by this Title, require it to submit reports regularly on prescribed forms, and act on violations of any provisions of this Title.
Can the Secretary of Labor and Employment issue a warrant of arrest?
No. In the old case of Salazar vs. Achacoso, it was declared that Art. 38 of the LC is unconstitutional and that the Secretary of Labor and Employment cannot issue a warrant of arrest.
Which of the following acts is NOT part of the regulatory and visitorial power of the Secretary of Labor and Employment over recruitment and placement agencies? The power to
(A) order arrest of an illegal recruiter
(B) inspect premises, books and records
(C) cancel license or authority to recruit
(D) garnish recruiter’s bond
A
The visitorial and enforcement powers of the DOLE Regional Director to order and enforce compliance with labor standard laws can be exercised even when the individual claim exceeds P5,000.00. T or F.
True. The visitorial and enforcement powers of the DOLE Regional Director to order and enforce compliance with labor standards laws can be exercised even when the individual claims exceed P5,000.00 The authority under Article 128 may be exercised regardless of the monetary value involved. Under Article 129, however the authority is only for claims not exceeding P5,000.00 per claimant.q
Inggo is a drama talent hired on a per drama “participation basis” by DJN Radio Company. He worked from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., six days a week, on a gross rate of P80.00 per script, earning an average of P20,000.00 per month. Inggo filed a complaint before the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) against DJN Radio for illegal deduction, non-payment of service incentive leave, and 13th monthpay, among others. On the basis of the complaint, the DOLE conducted a plant level inspection.
The DOLE Regional Director issued an order ruling that Inggo is an employee of DJN Radio, and that Inggo is entitled to his monetary claims in the total amount of
P30,000.00. DJN Radio elevated the case to the Secretary of Labor who affirmed the order. The case was brought to the Court of Appeals. The radio station
contended that there is no employer-employee relationship because it was the drama directors and producers who paid, supervised, and disciplined him.
Moreover, it argued that the case falls under the jurisdiction of the NLRC and not the DOLE because Inggo’s claim exceeded P5,000.00.
a. May DOLE make a prima facie determination of the existence of an employer-employee relationship in the exercise of its visitorial and enforcement powers?
b. If the DOLE finds that there is an employee-employer relationship, does the case fall under the jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter considering that the claim of Inggo
is more than P5,000.00. Explain.
a. Yes. Pursuant to Article 128 (b) of the Labor Code, the DOLE may do so where the prima facie determination of employer-employee relationship is for the exclusive purpose of securing compliance with labor standards provisions of said Code and other labor legislation.
The DOLE, in the exercise of its visitorial and enforcement powers, somehow has to make a determination of the existence of an employer-employee
relationship. Such determination, however, cannot be coextensive with the visitorial and enforcement power itself. Indeed, such determination is merely preliminary,
incidental and collateral to the DOLE’s primary function of enforcing labor standards provisions.
b. No. As held in the case of Meteoro v. Creative Creatures, Inc., the visitorial and enforcement powers of the Secretary, exercised through his representatives, encompass compliance with all labor standards taws and other labor legislation, regardless of the amount of the claims filed by workers; thus, even claims exceeding P5,000.00.
The Bantay-Salakay Security Agency (BSSA) employed ten security guards and assigned them to Surot Theater which contracted BSSA for its security needs.
On November 3. 1988, the ten (10) security guards of BSSA addressed to the Office of the President, a letter- complaint against their employer for non-compliance with R.A. 6640 providing for an increase in the statutory minimum wage and salary rates of employees and workers in the private sector. The letter was endorsed to the Secretary of Labor who, in turn, referred the matter to the Regional Director of Makunat City in Region XII where the ten (10) security guards reside and where their employer conducts business.
The Office of the Regional Director conducted an investigation and called for a hearing with all the parties present. Therefrom, the Regional Director found that there were indeed violations committed by BSSA
against the ten (10) security guards, such as underpayment of wages, non-integration of cost of living allowance, underpayment of 13th-month pay and
underpayment of five (5) days incentive pay BSSA and Surot Theater were directed to comply with the labor standards and ordered BSSA and Surot Theater to pay
jointly and severally to the ten (10) security guards their respective claim of P10,000.00 each or an aggregate amount of PI00,000.00. BSSA and Surot Theater
filed a Petition for Certiorari before the Supreme Court seeking to annul the decision of the Regional Director on the ground of grave abuse of discretion in assuming jurisdiction over the case. Will the Petition for Certiorari prosper? Decide with reason.
It is to be noted that the Regional Director assumed jurisdiction before the effectivity of RA No. 6715. Thus, applying Art. 128 of the Labor Code, the petition for certiorari will not prosper.
Under said article of the Labor Code, the Secretary of Labor or his duly authorized representatives - and Regional Directors are duly authorized representatives - have visitorial and enforcement powers. Thus, a Regional Director not only has visitorial powers, i.e., to visit the premises of an employer and examine his records, he also has enforcement powers, i.e. based on the findings of labor regulation officers or industrial
safety engineers made in the course of inspection. A Regional Director has the power to order and administer, after due notice and hearing compliance with the labor standards, provisions of the Labor Code. Thus, he could issue writs of execution to the appropriate authority for the enforcement of his orders, except in cases where the employer contests the findings of the labor regulation officer and raises issues which cannot be resolved without considering evidentiary matters that are not verifiable in the normal course of inspection.
Therefore, pursuant to Art. 128 of the Labor Code, the Regional Director was only exercising his visitorial and enforcement powers in the case of BSSA and Surot Theater. Thus, he has jurisdiction to do what he did.In a dissenting opinion. Chief Justice Narvasa said that even after the effectivity of RA No. 6715, the Regional Director has jurisdiction to act on claims exceeding P5.000.00. The petition for certiorari will prosper under Rep. Act No. 6715. its provision limiting the
power of Regional Directors to money claims not exceeding P5,000.00 per employee, the Regional Director no longer has the power to act on money claims exceeding P5.000.00 per employee, even if the same power exercised pursuant to his visitorial and
enforcement power under the Labor Code (Art. 128) where the P5.000 limitation is not found.
The Regional Director or his representative may be divested of his enforcement and visitorial powers under the exception clause of Article 128 of the Labor Code
and, resultantly, jurisdiction may be vested on the labor arbiter when three (3) elements are present. Which of the following is not one of the three (3) elements?
a. Employer contests the findings of the labor regulations officers and raises issues thereon;
b. In order to resolve any issues raised, there is a need to examine evidentiary matters;
c. The issues raised should have been verifiable during the inspection;
d. The evidentiary matters are not verifiable in the normal course of inspection.
c. The issues raised should have been verifiable during the inspection
It shall be mandatory for all Filipino workers abroad to remit a portion of their foreign exchange earnings to their families, dependents, and/ or beneficiaries in the country in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Labor and Employment. T or F.
True. Art. 22
Executive Order No. 857, as amended, prescribes the percentages of foreign exchange remittance ranging from _____ of the basic salary, depending on the worker’s kind of job. DOLE figures for 1998-2000 show that the annual remittances have breached the US$6 billion level, inspiring the government to call the OFWs “Mga Bagong Bayani” (New Heroes).
50 to 80%
Percentages of foreign exchange remittance required from various kinds of migrant workers
- Seaman or mariner – 80% of basic salary
- Workers for Filipino contractors and construction companies – 70%
- Doctors, engineers, teachers, nurses and other professional workers whose contract provide for free board and lodging – 70%
- All other professional workers whose employment contracts do not provide for free board and lodging facilities – 50%
- Domestic and other service workers – 50%
- All other workers not falling under the aforementioned categories – 50%
- Performing artists – 50%
[E.O. 857]
Individuals exempted from the mandatory remittance requirement
- The immediate family members, dependents or beneficiaries of migrant workers residing with the latter abroad
- Filipino servicemen working within US military installations
- Immigrants and Filipino professionals working with the United Nations and its agencies or other specialized bodies
As a rule, direct hiring of migrant workers is not allowed. What are the exceptions? Explain your answer.
The exceptions are: direct hiring by members of the diplomatic organizations, international organizations, heads of state and government officials with the rank of at least deputy minister, and such other employers as may be allowed by the Secretary of Labor [Article 18].
The reasons for the ban on direct hiring are:
a. a worker hired directly by a foreign employer without government intervention may not be assured of the best possible terms and conditions of employment.
b. a foreign employer must also be protected. Without government intervention, a foreign employer may be entering into a contract with a Filipino who is not qualified to do the job
c. the mandatory requirement for remittance to the Philippines of a portion of the worker’s foreign exchange earnings can easily be evaded by the
worker.
Other prohibited acts not mentioned in Art. 34
It shall likewise include the following acts, whether committed by any person, whether a non-licensee, non-holder, licensee or holder of authority:
a. to charge or accept directly or indirectly any amount greater than that specified in the schedule of allowable fees prescribed by the Secretary of Labor and Employment, or to make a worker pay or acknowledge any amount greater than that actually received by him as a loan or advance
b. to furnish or publish any false notice or information or document in relation to recruitment or employment
c. to give any false notice, testimony, information or document or commit any act of misrepresentation for the purpose of securing a license or authority under the Labor Code, or for the purpose of documenting hired workers with the POEA, which include the act of reprocessing workers through a job order that pertains to nonexistent work, work different from the actual overseas work, or work with a different employer whether registered or not with the POEA
d. to include or attempt to induce a worker already employed to quit his employment in order to offer him another unless the transfer is designed to liberate a worker from oppressive terms and conditions of employment
e. to influence or attempt to influence any person or entity not to employ any worker who has not applied for employment through his agency or who has formed, joined or supported, or has contacted or is supported by any union or workers’ organization
f. to engage in the recruitment or placement of workers in jobs harmful to public health or morality or to the dignity of the Republic of the Philippines
g. to fail to submit reports on the status of employment, placement vacancies, remittance of foreign exchange earnings, separation from jobs, departures and such other matters or information as may be required by the Secretary of Labor and Employment
h. to substitute or alter to the prejudice of the worker, employment contracts approved and verified by the Department of Labor and Employment from the time of actual signing thereof by the parties up to and including the period of the expiration of the same without the approval of the Department of Labor and Employment
i. for an officer or agent of a recruitment or placement agency to become an officer or member of the Board of any corporation engaged in travel agency or to be engaged directly or indirectly in the management of travel agency
j. to withhold or deny travel documents from applicant workers before departure for monetary or financial considerations, or for any other reasons, other than those authorized under the Labor Code and its implementing rules and regulations
k. failure to actually deploy a contracted worker without valid reason as determined by the Department of Labor and Employment
l. failure to reimburse expenses incurred by the worker in connection with his documentation and processing for purposes of deployment, in cases where the deployment does not actually take place without the worker’s fault. Illegal recruitment when committed by a syndicate or in large scale shall be considered an offense involving economic sabotage
m. to allow a non-Filipino citizen to head or manage a licensed recruitment/manning agency [Sec 5]
In addition to the acts enumerated above, it shall also be unlawful for any person or entity to commit the following prohibited acts: RA 10022
- Grant a loan to an overseas Filipino worker with interest exceeding eight percent (8%) per annum, which will be used for payment of legal and allowable placement fees and make the migrant worker issue, either personally or through a guarantor or accommodation party, postdated checks in relation to the said loan
- Impose a compulsory and exclusive arrangement whereby an overseas Filipino worker is required to avail of a loan only from specifically designated institutions, entities or persons
- Refuse to condone or renegotiate a loan incurred by an overseas Filipino worker after the latter’s employment contract has been prematurely terminated through no fault of his or her own
- Impose a compulsory and exclusive arrangement whereby an overseas Filipino worker is required to undergo health examinations only from specifically designated medical clinics, institutions, entities or persons, except in the case of a seafarer whose medical examination cost is shouldered by the principal/shipowner
- Impose a compulsory and exclusive arrangement whereby an overseas Filipino worker is required to undergo training, seminar, instruction or schooling of any kind only from specifically designated institutions, entities or persons, except for recommendatory trainings mandated by principals/shipowners where the latter shoulder the cost of such trainings
- For a suspended recruitment/manning agency to engage in any kind of recruitment activity including the processing of pending workers’ applications
- For a recruitment/manning agency or a foreign principal/employer to pass on the overseas Filipino worker or deduct from his or her salary the payment of the cost of insurance fees, premium or other insurance related charges, as provided under the compulsory worker’s insurance coverage. (Sec. 6, RA 8042 as amended)
Elements of simple illegal recruitment
- The person charged with the crime must have undertaken recruitment activities defined under Art. 13 (b) or prohibited activities defined under Art. 34; and
- The said person does not have a license or authority to do so. [Art. 38, LC]
Salazar v. Achacoso
FACTS: Public respondent issued a Closure and Seizure Order No. 1205 to petitioner after knowing that the latter had no license to operate a recruitment agency and the seizure of the documents and paraphernalia are being used or intended to be used as means of committing illegal recruitment. Petitioner filed for the return of the confiscated materials with the contention that these were seized against her will and were done with unreasonable force and intimidation.
ISSUE: Whether or not the POEA or the Secretary of Labor can validly issue warrants of search and seizure
RULING: No. It is only a judge who may issue warrants of search and arrest, neither it may be done by a mere prosecuting body. The Secretary of Labor, for not being a judge must go through the judicial process.
Further, the Supreme Court held that a warrant must identify clearly the things to be seized, otherwise, it is null and void.
Employees not covered in Book III Title 1
- Government employees
- Managerial employees
- Other officers or members of a managerial staff
- Domestic servants (now Kasambahay)
- Persons in the personal service of another
- Workers paid by results
- Field personnel
- Members of the family of the employer
Hours of work
All hours are hours worked which the employee is required to give to his employer, regardless of whether or not such hours are spent in productive labor or involve physical or mental exertion