(Part of psychiatric harm) Primary and secondary victims Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

What is a primary victim?

A

Someone directly involved in an incident who was at risk of physical harm, and suffers a recognised psychiatric injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a secondary victim?

A

Someone who witnesses an incident or its aftermath, suffers a recognised psychiatric injury, but was not directly involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case can be used for primary victims?

A

Paige v Smith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the Paige v Smith case.

A

C involved in minor car accident.

Not physically injured but suffered a relapse of a previous psychiatric illness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What would happen if everyone who was a secondary victim was permitted to claim?

A

The courts would be overwhelmed with claims and it would be unaffordable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must a secondary victim establish in order to make a claim?

A

Proximity - closeness in time and space or relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case can be used for secondary victims?

A

McLoughlin v O’Brian.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case established a criteria for secondary victims after McLoughlin v O’Brian?

A

Alcock v Chief Constable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the critera set out in Alcock v Chief Constable?

A

C must have close ties of love and affection with V

C must be close to the accident in time and space

C must perceive accident with his own senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What do primary victims not have to prove?

A

They don’t have to prove that psychiatric harm was foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly