Part One, Chapter 1 - Definitions and Issues In Corporate Governance Flashcards
The flashcards in this deck will test your knowledge in Chapter One (pages 3-25 in the textbook). (90 cards)
What was The Cadbury Report and its purpose?
The Cadbury Report was the first corporate governance code in the world. It contained a number of recommendations to raise standards in corporate governance. Its purpose was to encourage honesty and accountability of listed companies by establishing principles for them to follow.
The Cadbury Report covered which eight topics?
The topics covered by the Cadbury Report included:
- Board effectiveness
- The roles of the chair and the non-executive directors
- Access to independent professional advice
- Directors’ training
- Board structures and procedures
- The role of the company secretary
- Directors’ responsibilities
- Internal financial controls and internal audit
Who chaired the committee that led to The Cadbury Report being published?
Sir Adrian Cadbury.
What did The Cadbury Committee (1992) define corporate governance as?
The Cadbury Committee (1992) defined corporate governance as ‘the system by which companies are directed and
controlled’.
True or false? There is no one definition of corporate governance.
True!
What did The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) define corporate governance as?
‘A set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders … also provides the structure through which the objectives of the company are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined’.
What did The UK Corporate Governance Code 2016 state was the purpose of corporate governance?
According to the 2016 Code, ‘the purpose of corporate governance is to facilitate effective, entrepreneurial and prudent management that can deliver the long-term success of the company’.
What does The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code recognise?
The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code recognises that companies do not exist in isolation: ‘To succeed in the long-term, directors and the companies they lead need to build and maintain successful relationships with a wide range of stakeholders.’
There are no agreed definitions or approaches to corporate governance. There is, however, agreement on four
concepts of corporate governance. List them.
- Accountability
- Responsibility
- Transparency
- Fairness
Who benefits from corporate governance?
Corporate governance benefits organisations of all sizes across all three sectors, public, private and not for profit.
What are the two main theories that form the basis for corporate governance practices?
- Shareholder primacy theory which forms the basis of the shareholder value approach to corporate governance.
- Stakeholder theory which forms the basis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance.
What does the shareholder primacy theory of corporate governance focus on?
The shareholder primacy theory of corporate governance focuses on maximising the value to shareholders before considering other corporate stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers and society as a whole.
Who developed the shareholder primacy theory?
Milton Friedman and Henry Manne
According to the shareholder primacy theory, what is the purpose of directors, managers, and employees in a company?
The shareholder primacy theory is based on the premise that shareholders own companies and that directors, managers and employees are engaged by the company for the purpose of maximising shareholder wealth.
What is the contrary view advocated by supporters of the stakeholder approach?
The contrary view advocated by supporters of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance is that shareholders
don’t actually own the company as the company is a separate legal entity in and of itself.
Why has shareholder primacy as a governance model come under criticism? List two reasons.
- Inappropriate stewardship - It is argued that changes in shareholder structure from direct investment by individual shareholders to wealth invested under management (asset managers, pensions, insurance) has led to what are often referred to as ‘ownerless companies’, where no single investor has a large enough stake in the company to act as the responsible owner, checking the performance and behaviour of the board and management of the
company. - Short termism - Defined by the Kay Report (2012) as both ‘a tendency to under-investment, whether in physical assets or in intangibles such as product development, employee skills and reputation with customers, and as a hyperactive behaviour by executives whose corporate strategy focuses on restructuring, financial re-engineering or mergers and acquisitions at the expense of developing the fundamental operational capabilities of the business’.
What did the agency theory criticise company directors for?
The theory argues that company directors were not likely to be as careful with other people’s money as their own.
When is an agent-principal relationship established?
The agent–principal relationship exists when an agent represents the principal in a particular transaction and is expected
to represent the best interests of the principal above their own.
Who are the parties involved in an agent-principal relationship, and under what condition does this relationship exist?
Jensen and Meckling argued that the agent–principal relationship existed in companies where there was a separation of ownership and control. The shareholders played the part of the principal and the directors and managers played the part of the agent.
Conflict arises in an agent–principal relationship when agents and principals have differing interests. Provide two examples of the main conflicts between shareholders and managers.
- Shareholders usually want to see their income and wealth grow over the long term so will be looking for long-term
year-on-year increases in dividends and share prices. - Directors and managers, on the other hand, will be looking more short-term to annual increases in their remuneration and bonuses.
Jensen and Meckling identified four areas of conflict between shareholders and managers. List and define them.
- Moral hazard - A manager has an interest in receiving benefits from his or her position in the company (use of a company car, plane, house, events etc). Jensen and Meckling suggested that a manager’s incentive to obtain these benefits is higher when they have no shares, or only a few shares, in the company.
- Level of effort - Managers may work less hard than they would if they were the owners of the company. The effect of
this lack of effort could be smaller profits and a lower share price. - Earnings retention - The remuneration of directors and senior managers is often related to the size of the company (measured by annual sales revenue and value of assets) rather than its profits. This gives managers an incentive to increase the size of the company, rather than to increase the returns to the company’s shareholders.
- Time horizon. Shareholders are concerned about the long-term financial prospects of their company, because the value of their shares depends on expectations for the long-term future. In contrast, managers might only be interested in the short term. This is partly because they might receive annual bonuses based on short-term performance, and partly because they might not expect to be with the company for more than a few years.
Agency theory says that companies should use corporate governance practices to avoid or manage conflicts.
Provide two examples of how companies can achieve this.
- The use of long-term incentive share award or stock option schemes based on total shareholder return to align
the interests of shareholders and management. - Adoption of conflict of interest and related party transaction policies.
Define ‘agency costs’.
Agency costs are the costs associated with maintaining the agent–principal relationship.
Provide examples of agency costs expected to be paid in a company.
- Bonding costs – The cost of paying directors and executive management.
- The costs of monitoring the performance of the board and executive management - These will include the cost of
general meetings and of the production and distribution of shareholder information such as annual reports and
financial statements. It could be argued with the introduction of electronic communications that the cost of the latter
has been reduced in recent years. - Residual loss - This relates to the costs to shareholders associated with actions by the directors and executives which in
the long run turn out not to be in the interests of the shareholders, for example a major acquisition or disposal, fraud
or foray into a new business line.