Parties Flashcards

1
Q

Parties to Offences
S66(1) CA1961

(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-

A

(a) Actually commits the offence; or
(b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) Incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parties to Offences
S66(2) CA1961

(2) Where two or more persons…

A

S66(2) CA61

Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose,
and to assist each other therein,
each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Parties to offences - S70(1) and (2)

Legislation

A

70 Offence committed other than offence intended

(1) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence of which that other is afterwards guilty is a party to that offence, although it may be committed in a way different from that which was incited, counselled, or suggested.

(2) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence which that other commits in consequence of such inciting, counselling, or procuring, and which the first-mentioned person knew to be likely to be committed in consequence thereof.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Parties

What you must prove

A
  • The identity of the defendant, and
  • an offence has been successfully committed; and
  • the elements of the offence (s66(1)) have been satisfied.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When participation must have occurred

A

To be considered a party to the offence, participation must have occurred before or during (contemporaneous with) the commission of the offence and before the completion of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Caselaw:

R v Pene

(Intentionally help)

A

R v Pene

A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Caselaw:

R v Renata

(Principal offender)

A

R v Renata

The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caselaw:

Larkins v Police

(Actual proof of assistance) + examples

A

Larkins v Police

While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance.

  • Keeping lookout for someone committing a burglary.
  • Providing a screwdriver to someone interfering with a motor vehicle.
  • Telling an associate when a neighbour is away from their home so as to allow the opportunity to commit a burglary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Caselaw:

Ashton v Police

(Legal Duty)

A

Ashton v Police

An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under s156 of the Crimes Act 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Caselaw:

R v Russell

(Special Relationship)

A

R v Russell

The court held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save his children, but by his deliberate abstention from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wife’s act he became an aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Caselaw:

R v Betts and Ridley

(No violence is contemplated)

A

R v Betts and Ridley

An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be held liable for the violence used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the difference between a principal offender and a secondary offender in ‘parties to’ offences?

A

Principal offender:
* Liable under 66(1)(a) where they personally satisfy the actus reus and the mens rea requirements of the offence
* Actual participation in the offence committed has occurred
* There may be more than one offender identified as a principal offender.

Secondary offender:
People whose assistance/abetment/incitement/counselling/procurement is sufficient under S66(1)(b-d). This is despite the fact that the secondary party does not themselves commit that offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Definition: Act

A

Act: To take action or do something, to bring about a particular result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition: Omission

A

Omission: the action of excluding or leaving out someone or something, a failure to fulfil a moral or legal obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Definition: Aid

A

To assist in the commission of the offence, either physically or by giving advice and information.

Example: Acting as a lookout during a burglary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definition: Aiding by omission

A

Where someone fails to observe or discharge a duty by exercising their control to prevent someone from committing an offence.

17
Q

Examples of a person providing actual assistance to a principal offender in the commission of an offence

A
  • Keeping lookout for someone committing a burglary
  • Providing a screwdriver to someone interfering with a motor vehicle
  • Telling an associate when a neighbour is away from their home so as to allow the opportunity to commit a burglary.
18
Q

Definition: Abets

A

To instigate or encourage; to urge on another person to commit an offence.

Their presence at the scene of the offence at the time is not required.

Example: R v Russell

19
Q

Definition: Incite

A

To rouse, stir up, stimulate, animate, urge or spur on a person to commit an offence.

Example: A sports fan encouraging others to fight at a sports game.

20
Q

Definition: Counsels

A

To intentionally instigate the offence by advising a person(s) on how best to commit an offence, or planning the commission of an offence for another person(s).

Example: Writing a letter to someone instructing them on how to cook methamphetamine.

21
Q

Definition: Procurement

A

Setting out to see that something happens and taking the appropriate steps to ensure that it does.

Procurement requires that the secondary party deliberately causes the principal party to commit the offence.

Example: Procuring the services of a hitman.

22
Q

What is a Probable consequence

A

A subjective appreciation on the part of the offender (person A), where they must actually foresee the likelihood that their co-offender (person B) will commit another offence (offence B) when committing the original offence (offence A) agreed by both parties.

23
Q

What are the two qualifications to be satisfied under the general rule in relation to probable consequence?

A

Qualification one: No requirement that person A know or foresee the precise manner in which offence B is committed by person B. Person A need only realise that an offence of that type is probable.

Qualification two: No requirement to include any appreciation of the consequences of the physical elements of the offence committed (offence B), but for which no mens rea element is required.

24
Q

Under a joint enterprise, when would a person be charged as a party to murder and when would a person be charged as a party to manslaughter?

A

Party to murder if:

  • They intentionally helped or encouraged it, or
  • Foresaw murder by a confederate, as a real risk in the situation that arose.

Party to manslaughter where they:

  • Knew that at some stage there was a real risk of killing short of murder, or
  • Foresaw a real risk of murder, but the killing occurred in circumstances different from those contemplated, or
  • Can be expected to have known that there was an ever-present real risk of killing.
25
Q

What is an innocent agent?

A

An innocent agent is someone who is unaware of the significance of their actions.