Parties Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

Parties to offences

A

Crimes Act 1961, Section 66

(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who-
(a) Actually commits the offence; or
(b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) Incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.

(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probably consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Offence committed other than offence intended

A

Crimes Act 1961, Section 70

(1) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence of which that other is afterwards guilty is a party to that offence, although it may be committed in a way different from that which was incite, counselled, or suggested.

(2) Every one who incites, counsels, or procures another to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence which that other commits in consequence of such inciting, counselling, or procuring, and which the first-mentioned person knew to be likely to be committed in consequence thereof.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What you need to prove

A

In each case of charging a person with being a party to an offence, you must prove:
- The identity of the defendant, and
- an offence has been successfully committed; and
- the elements of the offence (s66(1)) have been satisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intention to help or encourage must exist

A

R v Pene
A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Multiple offenders

A

R v Renata
The court held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66(1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Actual proof of assistance is required

A

Larkins v Police
While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance.

Examples of assistance
- Keeping lookout for someone committing a burglary.
- Providing a screwdriver to someone interfering with a motor vehicle.
- Telling an associate when a neighbour is away from their home so as to allow the opportunity to commit a burglary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Legal duty

A

Ashton v Police
An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precaustions, because under s156 of the Crimes Act 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Special relationship

A

R v Russell
The court held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save his children, but by his deliberate asbstntion from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wife’s act he became an aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common intention

A

R v Betts and Ridley
An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be held liable for the violence used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly