partnership part 3 Flashcards
(43 cards)
Suits under UPA 1914
Partnership can’t sue or be sued in
partnership’s name
Suits under RUPA 1997
- partnerships can be sued
- partnerships as first resort (exceptions)
disclosing information
some courts say if a partnership couldnt afford to do oppertunity, may not need to
disclose the oppertunity
Who are the fiduciary duties owed to?
- partnership
- other partners
Who owes the fiduciary duties?
partners
Law of fiduciary obligations developed before and after UPA 1914 through case law
- Can’t use partnership assets for own benefit or private
advantage - No competition or rivalry with the partnership
- Can’t use knowledge or information which belongs to the firm
Every partner must account to the partnership for any benefit,
and hold as trustee for it any profits derived by him without the
consent of the other partners from any transaction connected with
the formation, conduct, or liquidation of the partnership or from any use by him of its property
-This section applies also to the representatives of a deceased partner engaged in the liquidation of the affairs of the partnership as the personal representatives of the last surviving partner
Records and Disclosure Duties
- Every partner shall at all time have access to and may inspect the books
- Partners shall render on demand true and full information affecting the partnership
Duty of Loyalty
- Account to partnership and hold as trustee any property, profit or benefit in the conduct or winding up of the partnership business or derived from partnership property, including appropriation of partnership opportunity (RUPA 1997 §404(b)(1))
- No adverse interests in the conduct or winding up of the partnership (RUPA 1997 §404(b)(2))
- However, Partners can enter into loans and other transaction at arms’ length terms.
- Fair is fine
- No competing with the partnership before the dissolution
RUPA 1997
The only fiduciary duties are the duty of
loyalty and care
Duty of Care
No grossly negligent, reckless conduct, intentionally misconduct or knowing violations of
law in the conduct and winding up of the partnership
RUPA 1997 also lists these duties but doesn’t call them fiduciary duties
- good faith and fair dealings
- record keeping/information/disclosure
- dont be selfish, dont have to be selfless
Record keeping/information/disclosure
Not only provide information when asked but without demand provide, any information concerning the partnership’s business and affairs reasonable required for the proper exercise of the partner’s
rights and duties
RUPA duty
Don’t be selfish, don’t have to be selfless
Don’t violate duties/obligations merely because the conduct furthers the partner’s own interest
Partnerships
Bottom line, comply withthese 4 duties
- Loyalty
- Care
- Good faith and fair dealing
- Record keeping/information rights/ disclosure
Watering down the duty of loyalty
- Can’t eliminate the duty of loyalty in the partnership agreement under the uniform act
- You can specify what activities do not violate the duty of loyalty if not manifestly unreasonable
- Authorization or ratification after full disclosure of material facts
- Elimination is fine with Delaware
Reducing the Duty of Care
- Partners may not unreasonably reduce the duty of care (RUPA 1997 §103(b)(4))
- Cannot authorize conduct involving bad faith, willful or intentional misconduct, or knowing violation of law. (RUPA)
- Elimination is fine with Delaware
Good Faith and Fair Dealing Standards
- Can’t eliminate the good faith and fair dealing obligation in the partnership agreement (RUPA 1997 §103(b)(5))
- You can prescribe standards by which to measure the obligation of good faith
and fair dealing if the standards are not manifestly unreasonable (RUPA 1997 §103(b)(5)) - Can’t eliminate even in Delaware (Del. Code tit. 6, § 15-103(f))
Restrictions on Access to Books and Records
- Can’t unreasonably restrict access to books and records (RUPA (1997) §
103(b)(2)) - Under RUPA 1997 the affirmative duty to provide information without being asked can be waived
- Elimination, on its face, is fine with
Delaware (Del. Code tit. 6, § 15-103(f)) ( but would refusing access to books be good faith and fair dealing?)
May partners compete with one another, and with the partnership, if the partnership agreement permits such competition?
Yes. In general, partners have a fiduciary duty not to compete with one another, unless the partnership agreement permits it.
Can you rent out to a partner below market value?
No, would be a violation of duty of loyalty bc taking money away from the partnership
negligence needed for a current partner to be liable
not normal negligence, need gross negligence
Do you have fiduciary duties to former partners?
no only current partners
At-will Partnerships vs. Partnerships for a
Definitive Term
- At-will partnerships – no discussion of end point
- Partnerships for a definitive term – ending at a
particular time or when a certain task has been
accomplished