PathCrap Flashcards

1
Q

When a RANZCR path question says “describe” they want?

A

When a RANZCR path question says “describe” they want
epi, macro, micro, bio beh.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Endometrial ca Type I (not molecular subtypes)

Histo and IHC

A

Precursors: Atypical endometriod hyperplasia, endometriod intraepithelial lesions.

Endometriod adenocarcinoma:
Invasive malignant glandular tissue w/non-squarmous solid component and desmoplastic response (increasing %solid increases FIGO grade I-III)
Severe nuclear atypia increase Grd by 1.
Differntiated from atypical hyperplasia by complex architecture: Cribiform, papillary, labrinthyine

IHC not necessary. ER/PR! (unlike type 2), PAX8, CK7, vimentin.

Mucinous carcinoma is rare and included in type 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHO classification of endometrial Ca:

A

By tumour lineage:
Epithelial: precursor lesions (i.e. endometrial hyperplasia), endometroid adenocarcinoma, papillary serous, clear cell, mucinous, neuro-endocrine tumours

Mesenchymal: leiomyoma (fibroid), leiomyosarcoma, stromal sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma

Mixed epithelial/ mesenchymal: adenomyoma, atypical polypoid adenomyoma, adenofibroma,
adenosarcoma, carcinosarcoma

Other:
- Misc: adenomatoid tumours, neuro-ectodermal tumour, germ cell tumour
- Mets = breast, melanoma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Endometrial Ca Type 2:

A

10-20% of Cas: clear cell, papillary serous (10%).
Papillary: high grd anaplastic cells in complex papillary, glandular, or solid growth pattern (other features: necrosis, psammoma bodies, myometrium invasion, vascular invasion).
Bio beh: poor prog.
Correlates well with CA-125
p53+, p16+ (often strong and diffuse), AE1/AE3 and CK7+, PAX8+, MSH1/
MLH2/ MLH6/ PSM2 (can be loss in ~ 10% cases). CK20-, ER/PR-

Clear Cell (1-5%): papillary, tubule-cystic, or solid architecture with clear
cytoplasm (due to glycogen content) and ‘hob-nailing’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are psammoma bodies?

Where do they occur?

A

Round microscopic calcifications forming concentric calcifications.

Brain:
- Prolactinoma
- Meningioma
- Melanocytic schwannoma

Thyroid:
- Papilliary Carcinoma!!!

Lung:
- mesothelioma

Endometrium:
- Papilliary serous carcinoma

Ovaries:
- both benign and malignant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Approach to determining IDH status and additional tests that might trigger:

A

Upfront glioma IHC: IDH R132H, ATRXloss, p53

Step 1:
Immunohisto chemistry for most (>85%) common IDHmutant IDH1 R132H.
If present, then not GBM

If negative

Step 2:
Genotyping to detect Mutation
This step can be omitted if elderly (no absolute cut-off, but age>55 very low chance of mut if IHC-v
(also consider not testing if necrosis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Endometrial Cancer molecular markers - prognostic and predictive value for each, how to they change staging?

A

POLEmut - Good prognosis - low risk spread.
P53abn - poor prognosis
MMRd=MSI - Intermediate prognosis, if coupled with POLEmut then over-rides p53. MMRd has predictive value - benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor.
NSMP= No Specific Molecular Profile = Copy number low = default grouping where no POLE mut, TP53abn, or dMMR/MSI-H = intermediate prognosis.

Changes early stage:
POLEmut endometrial carcinoma, confined to the uterine corpus or with cervical extension, regardless of the degree of LVSI or histological type becomes stage “1AmPOLEmut” = 1A

p53abn - Upstages any stg II to stg IIC “IICp53abn”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the aggressive and non-aggressive subtypes of endometrial Ca?

A

Non-aggressive histological types are composed of low-grade (grade 1 and 2) EECs.

Aggressive histological types are composed of high-grade EECs (grade 3), serous, clear cell, undifferentiated, mixed, mesonephric-like, gastrointestinal mucinous type carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give the epidemiology of pit adenoma.
Basic Histo
How may staining be used to differentiate subtypes of pit adenoma?

A

Very common up to 17% at autopsy
M=F
70% of clinically detected disease is functional.

Genral histo: mono-morphic cells w/ salt-pepper chromatin.

The most common functional: Lactotroph (PRL) and somatotroph (GH) are Acidophilic/eosinophils.

The less common:
Basophilic (reddish blue/ purple) –
corticotroph (ACTH), gonadotroph (FSH/LH), thyrotroph (TSH)

Non-functioning - chromophobic!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Symptoms of a corticotrophic pit adenoma:

How would you investigate?

A

Cushing’s disease (as opposed to syndrome):
Central/ truncal obesity, plethoric moon face, buffalo hump, purple striae/ skin marks, acne, hirsutism, proximal muscle wasting.

Systemic: hypertension, glucose intolerance, osteoporosis, impotence, amenorrhea/ oligomenorrhea

Corticotroph
▪ Serum ACTH level
▪ 24-hour urine free cortisol
▪ Late night salivary cortisol level
▪ Dexamethasone suppression test: take 1mg dexamethasone 11pm, and blood test for
cortisol in morning (>10ng/mL = Cushing’s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lactotoph pit adenoma Sx:

How would you investigate?

How about for a somatotroph?

A

Women: galactorrhea, oligomenorrhea, infertility
Men: hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, infertility, galactorrhea (rare)

Lactotroph: serum prolactin (>100ng/mL = macroadenoma; 30-100ng/mL = microadenoma)

Somatotroph: serum GH, IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor)
▪ Glucose tolerance test (early morning fasting blood glucose; drink 75g glucose; then repeat blood glucose at 1 hour and 2 hour post)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Medical approach to lactotrophs:

How about the others?

A

Prolactinoma – initial treatment D2-agonist = cabergoline o May gradually withdrawn every 2-3 years to assess remission
o 90% response, 10% unresponsive/ intolerant

  • GH-oma: somatostatin analogue (Octreotide) while waiting for surgery/ radiotherapy
  • ACTH-oma (Corticotroph): ketoconazole
  • TSH-oma: somatostatin analogue (Octreotide)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What immunohistochemical features allow you to distinguish between non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and mesothelioma. (1 mark)

A

NSCLC:
Aden IHC= TTF-1, Ck7, Napsin-A.
SCC = CK5/6, p63+, TTF-1 -ve.

SCLC: synaptophysin and chromgranin+, CK7-ve and TTF-1-ve.

Mesothelioma: WT1+ve, ALSO CK5/6+, TTF1-ve, Ck7 negative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under the WHO classification of non-cranial germcell tumours, which NSGCTs are not derived from the typical origin?

A

WHO classifies into 1) Derived from in-situ disease (2) unrelated to in situ neoplasm (3) Sex cord stromal tumour.

Spermatocytic seminoma (derived from differentiated spermatogonia) and yolk sac tumour (pre pubertal) are not derived from in-situ germ cell neoplasm, just like teratomas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which tumours have Shiller-Duval bodies? What other features, what is the critical IHC?

A

Yolk sac AKA endodermal sinus tumour
* Most common paediatric GCT, 80% <2yo; may presents in mediastinum in adult, chemo- resistant
* Not associated cryptorchidism or GCNIS
!!!!!!!
* Serum marker:
elevated AFP (95-98% of cases),
~ 25% have elevated Beta-HCG

  • Macro: soft solid tumour with mucinous/gelatinous appearance
  • Micro: microcystic and reticular pattern, sieve-like/ lace-like appearance (due to intracytoplasmic vacuoles and merging of cells), Schiller-Duval bodies pathognomic (glomeruli-like endodermal sinuses).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The most aggressive Germ cell tumour?

BioBeh
Serum marker
Macro
Micro

A

Pure choriocarcinoma is rare, often seen as component of mixed NSGCT
* Haematogenous spread, may haemorrhage (present with haemoptysis with lung mets, haematemesis and melena with GI mets, anaemia, haemorrhagic brain mets)
* a/w gynaecomastia (10%), or hyperthyroidism
* Serum marker: very high Betea-HCG (in thousands; in all cases; level correlates w/ prog/tumour burden), AFP always normal!!!
* Macro: usually does not cause testicular enlargement, only small palpable testicular nodule; friable, haemorrhagic, necrotic
* Micro: 3 cell types:
o syncytiotrophoblastic (large, multinucleated cells with smudgy chromatin)
o cytotrophoblastic (round/ polygonal, sharp cell borders, clear
cytoplasm, single nucleus)
o intermediate trophoblastic (clear cytoplasm, large than cytotrophoblast with single nuclei)
IHC:
o B-HCG+ve (from syncytiotrophoblast), SALL4+, EMA+ve, cytokeratin +ve o OCT3/4- (+ in classic seminoma/ embryonal ca), CD117- (+ in classic seminoma), CD30- (+ in embryonal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do Mantle and Marginal Cells differ in the broad categories of lymphoma to which each belongs

A

Both NHL
Marginal = Low grade NHL. Pre germinal centre (inter folicullar area).
Mantle = intermediate grade NHL. Post germinal centre (perifollicular area).

Remember:
- Bone marrow (pre cursor B-cell Lymphoblastic leukaemia) ->

Lymphoid tissue:
-Pre = inter follicular space (mantle cells)
-Follicular = Germinal centre (centroblast->centrocyte) = Follicular, DLBCL, Burkitts or Hodgkins ->
- Post germ cell = perifollicular = Marginal, some DLBCL, plamacytoma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Give examples of germinal and non-germinal centre lymphomas:

A
  • Bone marrow (pre cursor B-cell Lymphoblastic leukaemia) ->

Lymphoid tissue:
-Pre = inter follicular space (mantle cells)
-Follicular = Germinal centre (centroblast->centrocyte) = Follicular, DLBCL, Burkitts or Hodgkins ->
- Post germ cell = perifollicular = Marginal, some DLBCL, plamacytoma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Bad prognostic cytogenetics/gene fusions for sarcomas:

A general non-prognostic cytogenetic traint of liposarcomas:

A
  • EWS-FL11 fusion transcript for Ewing sarcoma
  • SS18-SSX fusion transcript for synovial sarcoma (=worse)
  • FOXO1 translocation for alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

Liposarcoma (e.g 40% of sarcomas are well diff liposarc)
MDM2 (12q15) is consistently amplified/ over-expressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Lauren histological classification vs WHO (what are the categories?)

3 types of adenocarcinoma? Which is most aggressive?

Another way to subtype gastric cancer

A

Lauren: Intestinal vs diffues types

WHO:
AdenoCas: Tubular, papilliary, mucinous (>50% mucin producing)

Poorly cohesive carcinoma (with signet ring cell)

  • Rare variants
    o adeno-squamous
    o choriocarcinoma

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project recently uncovered four molecular subtypes of gastric cancer: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability (MSI), genomically stable (GS), and chromosomal instability (CIN).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The pathogenesis of bladder cancer points to 2 pathways after what event?
What are the tumours/histologies belonging to each cell type (mention recurrence rates):

A

Initial event = chromosome 9 deletion (both p and q)

80% Hyperplasia pathway (HRAS and EGFR mutations): Papilloma (largely benign 5%recurrence), Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP), and Non-invasive Papillary carcinoma = Ta High grade 70% recur!! - 15% Progress to Invasive HG (folowing p53 and Rb mutations).

20% Dysplasia pathway (Dysplasia->Cis->HG invasive)
1) Dysplasia, p53 and Rb (HPV-like) muts lead to:
2) 20% of dysplasia transform into CIS.
NB: CIS is flat!!!! and erythematous on Macro. Histo nucler pleo increased N:c and mitotic rate.

Invasive H-Grade - 50% metastasize.MOlecular events includer E and N cadherin loss, increased VGEF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What % of bladder cancers are invasive?
What are the subtypes how common is each?
For the most common type, grading is based on?
Give macro and micro and IHC:

A

25% of tumours
95% are invasive urothelial, 5% are SCC.
Macro: either flat, ulcerated, or papillary (sessile/ ulceration suggests HG)
Micro: atypical cells (spindle, pyramidal) invading basement membrane Grading: HG vs LG
based on: cytological atypia (polarity, nuclear size/ pleomorphism/ hyperchromatism), and
mitotic figure
IHC: CK7+, CK20+, HMWCK+ (marker of urothelial origin), GATA3+, p63

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

For invasive urothelial carcinoma, WHO say there are how many subtypes? One subtype is divided into multiple further subtypes, which is that?

Why is that relevant?

A

Urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation
o Squamous differentiation
o Glandular differentiation
o Trophoblastic differentiation
o Müllerian differentiation

An SCC with any component of conventional urothelial carcinoma is not an SCC but a “Urothelial carcinoma with Squamous differentiation”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How can IHC differentiate:
Urothelial carcinoma from SCC and prostate adenoCa

A

UC: GATA 3+, HMWCK+, CK7

SCC: CK 5/6, p63+, GATA3-

PrCa: PSMA, PSA, AMARC, P ROSTEIN. CK7 negative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
For bladder SCC: Epidem RFs Macro Histo IHC
Epidem: Rare - <5% of primary bladder cancers. RFs: Chronic irritation/inflammation (e.g. long term IDC, chronic UTIs, caculi, neurogenic bladder), smoking, schistosomias infection (in endemic areas), previous bladder SCC, radiation. Macro (not asked): Appear white due to keratin, bulky, polypoid, necrotic. Histo: Must not show component of conventional urothelial carcinoma (if present, tumour should be classified as urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation)!!! Keratin and intracellular bridging. IHC: CK 5/6, p53, GATA and HMWCK -ve
26
Epi/Biobeh of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate and PSA Histology:
3% of prostate cancer Periuthral disease may cause haematuria. More likely to have distant disease at Dx Mets including to unusual sites (e.g. the dick). Similar mortality rate to Gleason score 8 - 10 PSA can be highly variable, but on average lower than acinar. More likely to have a PSA < 4.0 ng/mL; Histo: Frequently mixed with acinar adenocarcinoma Tall columnar cells with pseudostratified nuclei. Patterns include cribriform, papillary, solid and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia-like pattern
27
c. Describe the WHO classification system for meningioma. (3.5)
Grade I to III. Is based on the presence or extent of Mitosis, Atypia, Invasion and Necrosis. Grd I: (80% of mengiomas): NO Mitosis, no necrosis, No brain invasions. These are hypocellular. 13 Subtypes: Fibroblastic most common. Grd II: (10%): Brain invasion OR frequent mitoses (>4/10xHPF) OR 3 or more atypical cellular features: Hyper-cellularity, high N:C ration, prominent nucleoli, pattern-less growth of focal necrosis. There are 3 subtypes (ACC): Atypical (most common), Clear Cell, Chordoid Grd III (<=5%): Very frequent mitosis (>20),OR melanoma, carcinoma, sarcoma features. Also 3 sub-types (RAP): Rhabdoid Anaplastic Papillary. Molecular classification: TERT promotor mutation or CDKN2A/B may be grade III.
28
Meningioma Macro Micro IHC
Well circumscribed, attached to dura, can be lobulated, separates easily from brain (separated by arachnoid plane) Micro: * Syncytial cells with indistinct cell membrane * lobulated architecture (meningothelial whorls) * may contain psammoma bodies * May have morphology features of mitoses, atypia, brain invasion, necrosis (‘MAIN’) IHC * Vimentin + (strong) (expressed in mesencymal cells) * EMA+ (may be weak/ focal, 70%) * S100+ * PR+ (70% of cases) – however, hormonally manipulation not proven to be effective) SWOG S9005 (Ji 2015 JCO) – mifepristone (n=80) vs. placebo (n=84) in unresectable meningioma; no difference in PFS and OS between arm
29
Epi for meningioma
* 30% of primary intracranial neoplasm * Most common benign intracranial tumour in adult * F: M 2:1 for all meningioma; 1:1 for anaplastic meningioma
30
b. Describe the microscopic features of a Gleason Grade 3 prostate adenocarcinoma (2m) c. List the immunohistochemical stains that may help differentiate between benign and malignant tissues in the prostate biopsy (1m)
Grade 3: - Small glands, discrete/ separate (i.e. not fused), no cribriform glands, no comedonecrosis IHC benign v.s Malig: 1) Malignant loose basal cells and become HMWCK -ve 2)p63 Expressed in basal cell nuclei - malignant = loss of basal cell → p63 IHC negative 3) AMACR - +ve in prostate cancer. Expressed on Apical portion
31
Describe the Gleason Scoring system for prostate cancer. Include mention of any differences between how the pathologists assigns the Gleason score on prostate biopsy specimens and a radical prostatectomy specimen (2m)
For both Bx and RRP specimens a primary (most prevalent) and secondary score (most aggressive or 2nd most common - see below) are reported. For RRP specimens a tertiary score is also reported - namely the 3rd most prevelent score. constituting <5% (if present). Grading is based on the extent and quality of glandular fromation and the presence of necrosis as follows: Gleason 1-2 - Non maligant glandular tissue Gleason 3: Small glands, with no comedo necrosis or solid component. 4: Slit like glandular lumens, fused glands, cribiform architecture 5: Solid architecture, comedo necrosis
32
ISUP grades
- ISUP GG1 = Gleason 3+3 - ISUP GG2 = Gleason 3+4 - ISUP GG3 = Gleason 4+3 - ISUP GG4 = Gleason 8 (4+4, 3+5, 5+3) - anything that adds to 8 - ISUP GG5 = Gleason 9 (4+5/ 5+4/5+5) - anything>=9
33
Describe each of the skin SCC precursor lesions. The give macro and micro. Same for SCC
Actinic keratosis (solar keratosis) o pre-malignant dysplastic lesion, a/w build-up of excess keratin o 1% progress to SCC, but 80% of SCC arise from them o Macro: brown rough sand-paper from excess keratin, ‘cutaneous horn’ o Micro: cytologic atypia of basal cells with hyperplasia, intracellular bridges, thickened stratum corneum, due to excess keratin production Bowen’s disease (SCC in situ) o 3% progress to SCC o Macro: sharply defined red macule/ papule/ plaque o Micro: atypical cells in all layers of epidermis but does not invade basement membrane (cf: actinic keratosis where dysplasia limited to basal layer of epidermis) SCC o Macro: nodular, ulcerative, varying amount of hyperkeratosis o Micro: atypical cells (variable cellular differentiation, descriptors of anaplasia), intracellular bridges, infiltrates dermis (WD – keratin pearls; PD – focal necrosis, no keratin) IHC: CK5/6+ve, AE1/3+ve, p63+ve, !!EMA +ve (cf: EMA -ve in BCC) DDx Keratokanthoma.
34
For BCC: Micro/macro IHC. Differentiate from SCC
Micro: Monotonous basoloid cells (large nuclei, scant cytoplasm), no intercellular bridge Architecture = Palisading peripheral cells, peripheral clefting, fibroblastic stroma IHC: BCL2+ve, p63+ve, EMA-ve (cf EMA+ve in SCC), CK20-ve
35
Macro and Micro description of PTC (papillary thyroid cancer):
Solid, grey white tumour, firm, invasive with ill-defined margins (<10% surrounded by complete capsule). Dx based heavily on distinct nuclear features: ▪ **Changes in nuclear size and shape**: large ovoid nuclei, nuclear elongation ▪ ***Irregularities of nuclear membranes***: abundant nuclear grooves (from infolding of nuclear membrane), highly irregular nuclear contour ▪ ***Chromatin pattern**: empty appearance of nucleoplasm, ground-glass nuclei (Orphan-Annie nuclei. i.e. empty looking) o Papillary Architecture o Presence of psammoma bodies (rounded, concentrically laminated calcification, from necrosis) in 50% of cases
36
Basic epidemiology and clinical presentation of follicular thyroid:
(15%) (arise from follicular cells) Epi: 75% women, older age than PTC (peak 40-60y/o), rare in children Clinical: o Associated with iodine deficiency (response to RAI, except Hurtle cell variants) o Usually solitary ‘cold’ nodule on radionuclide scan
37
Micro description of FTC (follicular thyroid cancer):
Dx is a bit of a contasting with PTC findings: o Trabecular or solid pattern of follicles (small, normal, or large size) o No nuclear features of PTC o Capsular invasion: capsule is typically thickened and irregular, needs penetration through the capsule (full thickness), may have reactive pseudo-capsule around invasion edge o Vascular invasion: vessel within or beyond capsule, tumour covered with endothelium, attached to wall/ with thrombus o May have nuclear atypia, focal spindled area, low mitotic figures (<1 per 10HPF) o No necrosis, usually no squamous metaplasia, no psammoma bodies, no/ rare lymphatic invasion
38
Essential features of Paget's disease of breast: Epi Common presentation What is it? Molecular feature
Uncommon (1-4% of Breast cancers) clinical presentation of breast cancer Most often presents as an eczematous / erythematous change of the nipple areolar skin Cutaneous manifestation is due to tumor cells involving the epidermis and disrupting intercellular junctions Underlying high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma is present in > 95% of patients Majority of Paget cells and associated underlying carcinoma are HER2+
39
For gene expression profiling (3m) i. Describe the 21-gene recurrence score (OncotypeDx), and the Amsterdam 70-gene profile (Mammaprint) ii. Discuss the predictive importance of the above profiles
OncotypeDx - Developed in the NSABP-B18 and B20 cohort - Based on 21-gene DNA micro-array - Used in women with ER+, N0 who have endocrine therapy - Predict risk of distant metastases and benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy - Stratified into 3 groups based on risk score – low (<18), intermediate (18-30), high (>30) Mamma Print (Amsterdam-70) - RCT prognostic validation - despite clinical high risk, low genomic risk pts have 95% distant met free survival without chemo
40
PAM50
41
Describe the basal like subtype of breast cancer (2m)
When a RANZCR path question says "describe" they want epi, macro, micro, bio beh. Epi - 15-20% of breast cancer - Young patients, - a/w BRCA1 mutation Micro: High proliferation rate Usually grade 3, high mitotic indices, with necrosis, pushing borders, conspicuous LVI Molecular/IHN Tripple negative p53 often mutated HMWCK + Biological behaviour: More aggressive local growth and spread. Higher benefit to anthracycline CTx.
42
List the risk factors for triple negative breast cancer
- Younger patients - p53 mutation - BRCA mutation carriers - Gynae: early menarche, e arly age at first pregnancy - More commonly a/w pregnancy-related breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer
43
Discuss breast cancer risk for: Li-Fraumini Lynch Other cancers:
Fi-Frau -90% by age 60 Lynch - 5%, unless PMS2 - then 25% Fi-frau (SBLA syndrome): - Sarcoma (soft tissue and bone) - Brain cancer - Leukaemia - Adrenal cancer Lynch (ECOG): - Colorectal cancer - Endometrial cancer - Ovarian cancer - Gastric cancer
44
Key pathological features of Invasive lobular carcinoma: Include key mutational risks
10 to 15% of cases overall, more common in women 45-55, estrogen exposure appears a greater risk factor (e.g. HRT), CDH1 mutation increase risk of lobular but not ductal cas, BRAC2 increases risk of both : rubbery texture, poorly visible on mammogram (better w/ MRI). “Indian filing” histology, Often bilateral/multicentric, >80% ER+, spreads to unusual locations such as meninges, serosal surfaces, BM, ovary, and RP - ?WHY????
45
Key pathological features of Invasive ductal carcinoma: Incidence, imaging Macro Micro IHC Bio beh
80% cases. Often well seen on mammogram. Macro: Firm mass (cartilagenous feeling) irregular mass with desmoplastic reaction, advanced can show teathering to sking (dimpling of the skin surface). Micro: Invasive malignant epithelial cells with degree of tubule formation suggestive of grade (more = lower) along with nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic rate. Surrounded by desmoplastic stroma. Lack characteristic feature suggestive of special type. IHC: Ck7, E-cadherin +, 60% ER+, 60%PR+, 25%HER2
46
The driver mutations and their frequencies for NSCLC:
EGFR Exon 19, and 21 33% (Osimertinib, older getfitinib) KRAS - 25% (not yet targeted) Alk - 5% - Mutually exculsive w/EGFR (alectinib) ROS-1 - 1% crixotinib BRAF V600E 1%
47
Mechanism of action for Osimertinib? Older alternatives? Mutations associated with resistance to alternatives? Most common side effects?
OsimERtnInb - has better CNS penetrance than older (Erlotinib, Getfitinib, possibly slower resistance). 15% (white ppl) to 50% (yellow ppl) of lung adeno Have EGFR mut. Must commonly Exon 19 or 21associated (40% each). T790M (Exon 20) increase treatment with EGFR TKI -> 50% cases of erlotinib/ gefitinib resistance. BUT T790M mutation are less aggressive than tumour with EGFR TKI resistance due to other mechanisms Osi side effects: Acne/rash, dry skin, diarrohoea (fuck with EGFR get gastro - like cetux), the need to eat bats.
48
For lung cancer compare testing methods for EGFR and ALK
EGFR - dont bother with IHC, go straight to Next Gen Sequencing. ALK - IHC for increased protein expression. If present do FISH.
49
Significance of KRAS mutations in lung Ca? How common?
While not yet a therapeutic target: Predictive: poor response to EGFR TKI Prognostic: More aggressive spread/poorer prognosis
50
What sarcoma is the most commonly induced radiation sarcoma? What is the second? How are sarcomas graded?
RT induced sarcoma: osteosarcoma (21%), Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, (17%), angiosarcoma (15%) GRADING (FNCLCC) – based on: Differentiation + mitotic count + necrosis
51
For sarcomas give the most common subtypes in: 1) Children and adolescents 2) Adults
Children and adolescents rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma; Adults: 1) Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, 25% 2) liposarcoma, 15% 3) leiomyosarcoma, ~5% myxofibrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma
52
Key cytogenetics for: Liposarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Synovial Rhabdo Fibrosarcoma
Lipo - MDM2 overexpressed especially in de-differentiated lipo do (12q13) FISH test Leio - Most common Li-Fraumini = TP53 Synovial t(X:18)(p11:q11) involving genes SS18, and either SSX1, SSX2: o SS18-SSX1 inhibit Snail gene, o SS18-SSX2 inhibit Slug gene (X,18) Rhabdo: FOXO1 translocation for alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma Fibrosarcoma = anueploidy.
53
Tumour prognostic factors for soft tissue sarcoma:
Location of tumour – retroperitoneal (compared to extremities) = poorer (often may not be completely resected) - Grade (take into account differentiation, mitotic count, and tumour necrosis) – higher grade = worse - Differentiation – differentiated (compared to well-differentiated) = more likely to have distant mets - Myogenic differentiation = increased risk of distant mets - Histological subtype – e.g. leiomyosarcoma = higher propensity for distant mets -Cyto gentics: e.g SS18-SSX1/2
54
For each of the following subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma, write brief notes on the key histological features and any critical chromosomal abnormalities i. Fibrosarcoma (1m) ii. Well-differentiated liposarcoma (1m) iii. Synovial sarcoma (1m) iv. Leiomyosarcoma (1m)
Fibrosarcoma: Highly cellular fibroblast proliferation in herringbone pattern, cyto = anueploidy WD Lipo: Mature adipocytes with variable size - Bizarre and hyperchromatic stromal cells within fibrous stroma Cyto= MDM2 amplification Synovial: 2 subtypes: spindle cell only (monophasic) or biphasic, spindle-epithelial. Chromosomal translocation t(X:18)(p11:q11), involving SS18, and SSX1/ SSX2 Leimyosarcoma: intersecting fascicles of spindle cells - Elongated ‘cigar-shaped nuclei - Necrosis common in large tumour - Mitotically active No key cytogentics, but most common Li-Fraumini (p53) associated.
55
ii. What are the risk factors and biological behaviour for Type 1 endometrial carcinoma? (3)
Type 1: Estrogen exposure: early menache, late menopause, null parity. Obsesity/low exercise, tamoxifen (2-3x risk). Poly cystic ovarian syndrome, estrogen producing tumours (e.g Ovarian granulosa) Genetic: Lynch Syndrome (mutations in MMR genes: MSH1, MLH2, MLH6, PMS2, or EPCAM gene silencing), Cowdens syndrome (PTEN). Protective: OCP (>6months associated w/decreased risk), child birth, Smoking Biobeh: Slower growing than type 2, 2/3 present early due to bleeding. Endometrial spread including to ovaries and cervix/vagina and myometrial invasion. Risk of nodal spread increases with degree of invasion (including LVI), early haematogenous spread rare. Distant met sites: Lung (most common), bone, liver, brain.
56
ii. What are the risk factors and biological behaviour for Type 2 endometrial carcinoma? (3)
Type 2: No clear risk factors. Age>70 most commonly occur in atrophy uterus. Less clear risk factors, modern research suggest estrogen exposure is also a risk. BioBeh: Aggressive local growth (compared to Type 1), Early spread to nodes and peritoneum (requires Bx at surgery) and higher rate of systemic spread. Distant met sites: Lung, bone, liver, brain.
57
Mechanisms for path resistance to immunotherapies:
1) Receptor/target mutations decreasing or preventing monoantibody binding 2) Bypassing mutations - e.g. signal transduction pathway amplifications, receptor independent signalling.
58
Lynch syndrome most common cancers (in order)
Colorectal 50% Endometrial 33% 10%Ovarian 5% Gastric. 5% Pancreas Turcotts - CRC + GBM
59
Compare and contrast the features of Primary Mediastinal B Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and Classical (Nodular Sclerosing) Hodgkin’s Lymphoma affecting the mediastinum: (3) i. Clinical ii. Histological; and iii. Immunohistochemical
Clinical; Mediastinal BNHL: Often presents late/bulky with symptoms of mass effect (e.g. cough, dyspnoea, SVC obstruction), can present B symptoms (fever, night sweats, wt loss). Tends to occur in adults mean age 35, F>M. Extra-mediastinal involvement uncommon at time of Dx. Classic HL: Tends to occur in younger patients mean age 25. M=F. Mediastinum involvement common. As above may present with Sx of bulky disease/mass effect, B Sx - Also Pel-Ebstein fevers (alternating weeks of high-fever, and no fever). Histological: M.NHL: Intermediate size malignant B-cells, densely packed (more so than HL) and or clustered. Clear cell change (abundant cytoplasm), prominent scelerosis (may mimic HL). Classic HL: Nodules within broad bands of sclerosing collagen along with eosinophils, plasma cells, atypical mononuclear cells and Reed-Sternberg cells. IHC: M.NHL: CD19, CD 20, PAX 8, BCL2, and BCL 6 may be present C.HL: CD15, Cd30
60
For a suspected glioma, what are the upfront IHC tests? Key molecular differences between astro and oligo. What feature may upgrade and astro to astro IV?
Upfront glioma IHC: IDH R132H, ATRXloss, p53 Astro: ATRXloss p53 Oligo: ATRX retained 1p19q codeleted Astro grd III -> IV is CDK2NA/B, necrosis, or microvascular proliferation
61
Besides IDH status, what other features are needed to Dx GBM What is normal role of MGMT? IDH?
IDH + at least 1 of: Endothelial proliferation Necrosis Microvascular profliferation TERT mut EGFR mut MGMT - rescues cells from alkylating agent induced damaged (e.g. tamzolomide). IDH: 2 roles - glucose metabolism, oxidative damage control.
62
List all the potential molecular features of a glioma, their significance (Dx, prog, pred)
IDH - obvious. ATRX mut/retained - Differentiate astro from oligo. Not prognostic. MGMT - predeictive and independently prognostic (unmethylated is poor) H3K27M - associated with midline glioma and por prognosis (often unmethylated) 1p19q - oligodenroglioma if 1p19q + IDHmut. Codel is a good prognostic and predictive feature. BRAF V600E - BRAF + histo consistent = pilocytic astro, Good prognostic and predictive (response to verafinib)
63
Compare diffuse astro to oligo in terms of histo and immuno: Also OS for each
Both are diffusely infiltrating. Both OS>10years. Astro: Hypercellular, infiltrative, monotonus cells, fibrillary background, NO mitosis or Necrosis. ATRX loss, no codeletion, TP53 mutation. IDH mut. Oligo: Diffusely infiltrating, 'fried-egg' apperance (due to perinuclear halo), chicken wire fine capillary network. ATRX retained + IDHmut (definitive), also 1p19q
64
List the adverse prognostic factors for Neuroblastoma (2m)
Prognostic factors = Factors in COGS staging (‘SAND-S’) - Stage: higher stage = worse - Age (>18mo = worse) - N-MYC protein amplified = worse - DNA ploidy (diploid = worse; hypo/ hyperploid = better) - Shimada classification (SAD-MiNd). SHIMADA (SAD-MiNd): o Stroma pattern (rich = better; poor = worse) o Age o Differentiation of neuroblast (differentiated = better; undifferentiated = worse) o Mitotic=karyorrhexis index (low = better; high = worse) o Nodularity (diffuse = better; nodular = worse) - Cytogenetic abnormalities o Favourable – hyperploidy DNA, TrK-A amplification o Unfavourable – N-Myc protein amplification, diploid DNA, deletion of 1p chromosome, del 11q, TERT rearrangement, ALK amplification
65
What is the Shimada classification? give its components:
SHIMADA (SAD-MiNd): o Stroma pattern (rich = better; poor = worse) o Age o Differentiation of neuroblast (differentiated = better; undifferentiated = worse) o Mitotic=karyorrhexis index (low = better; high = worse) o Nodularity (diffuse = better; nodular = worse) - Cytogenetic abnormalities o Favourable – hyperploidy DNA, TrK-A amplification o Unfavourable – N-Myc protein amplification, diploid DNA, deletion of 1p chromosome, del 11q, TERT rearrangement, ALK amplification
66
An abdominal CT scan of a 28 year old man shows an incidental 4cm mass in the upper pole of left kidney a. List the differential diagnosis (2m)
Benign - Polycystic kidney - Haematoma - Renal abscess - Granuloma - Sarcoid deposit. Malignant - Too old for wilms - Neuroblastoma - Rhabdoid tumour of kidney (RTK) - Clear cell sarcoma of kidney (CCSK) - Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) - Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) - Adrenal carcinoma - Lymphoma - Haemangiocytoma
67
Histo of Wilms, Most prognostic feature?
Presence of classic triphasic histology - Blastemal – presence of small round blue cells - Epithelial – variable epithelial differentiation in the form of tubule/ glomeruli - Stroma – manifest as immature spindle cells Unfavourable histology - Presence of extreme anaplasia (nuclei enlargement, nuclear hyperchromasia, abnormal mitotic figures) Presence of anaplastic histology – most powerful adverse prognostic features for Wilms
68
Wilms associated syndromes:
90% sporadic 9% genetic syndrome - WAGR syndrome – mutation in WT1 gene - BWS syndrome – mutation in WT2 gene 1% familial/ hereditary
69
Difference between WIlms and nephroblastoma on imaging
Neuo Classic egg shell calcification on XR - in 85% Wilm’s tumour No tumour calcification (may have calcification if haemorrhage)
70
Risk Factors for nephroblastoma
* Maternal use of alcohol, diuretics, opioid/ codeine, * Paternal exposure to hydrocarbon, wood dust, solders * No clear correlation with maternal age, smoking, infection, X-ray exposure, recreational drug, maternal hypertension/ diabetes * Majority sporadic, only 1-2% hereditary * Genetic syndromes: Hirschsprung disease, NF-1, foetal hydantoin syndrome
71
Briefly describe the relationship between HIV infection and Hodgkin’s lymphoma.(2)
HIV increases x 8 risk of HL (x10-20 NHL) via: Chronic antigenic stimulation, inflammation, and cytokine dysregulation. Furthermore, patients with HIV/AIDS have a higher risk of contracting oncogenic viruses (e.g. EBV). Thus, the pathogenesis of HIV/AIDS-associated lymphoma is a combination of factors, including an impaired immune system, genetic alterations, viral infection, and chronic B cell activation.
72
What are considered adequate surgical margins for: BCC SCC
BCC 3-4mm SCC and at least 4 mm for a low-risk SCC. There are no published guidelines for a high-risk SCC. 6-10mm is accepted range.
73
For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma describe (2 marks) a. the macroscopic features, b. the microscopic features c. the biological behaviour of the tumour.
a. the macroscopic features, Solid white/grey tumour, not encapsulated, poorly defined, invasive. 20% multifocal. b. the microscopic features Malignant glandular cells, with higher grade consisting of more solid component, surround desmoplastic stroma. PNI and LVSI common. IHC: Mapsin, CK7, pS100. c. the biological behaviour of the tumour. Aggressive local growth with invasion into adjacent structures, majority are unresectable at diagnosis, early nodal spread and metastatic spread to lung, liver and bone. 5year OS unresctable 5% (or less)
74
For colorectal cancer: Some shit you always forget to say should be on the path report Histo Defining IHC (compare with upper GI and other adeno). Key molecular studies and their implications:
Gross: Distance from resection margin – proximal, distant, circumferential Micro: "Tumour Response Grade" CDX2 + (points to upper or lower GI), CK 20, MUC2+, CK7 negative (upper GI CK7 positive) Molecular: dMMR (often serrated, more proximal, resistant to 5-FU, more response to immunotherapy, MSI mor favourable prog), KRAS (mut is resistant to Cetuxumab)
75
CRC: Describe the microscopic appearance that may be seen in resected tumour and lymph nodes arising as a consequence of pre-operative (neoadjuvant) therapy (3m)
1) Cellular response – amount of residual viable tumour in relation to stromal fibrosis (TRG) 3)Fibro-inflammatory response – more extensive inflammatory response = lower recurrence rate 2) Acellular mucin – mucin pools (not regarded as residual tumour and not counted towards ypTstage)
76
List the inherited syndromes known to have an increased risk of developing colorectal carcinoma, and comment on any extra-colonic conditions that may occur (2m)
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) - Typically >100 adenomations polys. Other cancers - Papillary thyroid, pancreas, gastric. Benign Stuff: Desmoid tumours, fibromas, sebaceous cysts. Lynch: 50%CRC, 30%endo, 20% ovarian. Peutz-Jaeger (STK11) - Pancreas, gastric, breast. Skin Melanocytic macules present in 90% MUTYH- associated polyposis Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Serrated polyposis Juvenile polyposis serrated polyposis
77
Describe familial polyposis coli (classic form)
Autosomal dominant, complete penetrance. avg age of Dx 15 Typically found to have >100 adenomatous polys
78
Histological subtypes of colorectal cancer? What is the seedy mnemonic? What is the implication of a KRAS mutation?
A Mormon Missionary...... Adenocarcinoma (55%_ Mucinous (15%) Micropapillary (10%) Serrated (10%) Medullary (5%) KRAS will not respond to Cetux.
79
Most common types of renal cancer: Give subtypes where appicable and basic histo, IHC for the most common type Name an associated genetic syndrome or 2.
RCC 85-90% - Clear cell (80%): abundant clear cytoplasm, vary degrees of atypia leading to heterogenous population. - Papillary (15%): Finger-like papillary projections - Chromophobe (5%): Large, prominent cell borders. Sarcomatous (5%): Sarcom like features - more aggressive often Dx at advanced stage. Not from the kidney: Urothelial carcinoma.
80
For primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland, describe the microscopic features (2m)
* Biphasic tumour with ductal and myoepithelial component * 3 different architectural pattern: tubular (most favourable), cribriform, solid (most aggressive) * Grading based on solid component (G1= no, G2<30%, G3 >30%)
81
For invasive carcinoma of the cervix: i. What is the frequency of the 2 most common subtypes of HPV infection in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (1m)
SCC: HPV16 (60%) HPV18 (10%) Adenosquarmous: HPV16 (35%) - HPV18 (35%) HPV 18 more virulent - helps explain why
82
For invasive carcinoma of the cervix: What are the possible causative factors for the increase in adenocarcinoma of the cervix (1.5m)
HPV infection esp. HPV18 Cervical screening less sensitive for detection of adenocarcinoma precursor (false negative 30-50%) Increasing in cervix adenocarcinoma risk factors e.g. increasing use of OCP/ HRT Better diagnosis/ tumour classification – in the past classified as SCC
83
General Sarcoma prognostic tumour factors
1) Grade: based on mitosis, differentiation, necrosis 2) Differentiation 3) Myogenic differention = bad 4) Aggressive sub type (i.e. Leimyosarcoma) 5) Location - e.g. retroperitoneal worse. 6) Cytogenetics ect: E.g. FOX01 (causes alveloar rhabdo, way worse than embryonal)
84
Prognostic factors for Ewings: Chemo?
Whatever the approach (surg or RT): VCD-IE 6 cycles upfront. Mnemonic= MASSSive LDH Response: Male, Age (>17), Site (pelvic/ truncal), Size (>8cm), Stage (Mets), high LDH, Response to chemo (especially necrosis, < or >90%)
85
Examples of some DNA microarray tests in breast cancer
Of prognostic value, only Oncotype Dx has validation for prediction and can be potentially beneficial in identifying low-risk patients not requiring CTX. Oncotype Dx - 21 gene array (16 cancer genes and 5 controls). The current on Mamma Print (Amsterdam-70) - RCT prognostic validation - despite clinical high risk, low genomic risk pts have 95% distant met free survival without chemo
86
Li Fraumini Cancers:
100% life-time risk of breeast cancer. SBLA syndrome!!! Sarcoma (e.g. leimyosarcoma) Brain Leukaemia Adrenal Adenocarcinoma
87
Histo for endometrial papillary serrous carcinoma
High grade anaplastic cells in complex papillary, glandular, solid growth pattern, with features of necrosis, psammoma bodies, myometrium invasion and vascular invasion
88
Figo grade III endometroid endometrial adenocarcinoma:
>50% non-squamous solid growth pattern (i.e. more sold, less glandular)
89
For breast IDC, how common are: ER/PR +ve HER2+ Tripple neg For invasive disease, how common are: IDC ILC Metaplastic carcinoma
ER/PR = 70% (Cohort data - PR expression was correlated with worse clinicopathologic characteristics, and associated with increased risk of recurrence, distant metastasis, and death compared with strong PR expression group) Her2 = 25% -3= 15%
90
Requirement to be a special subtype of breast cancer? What are the special subtypes? Which are the most and least aggressive? In which ladies (young vs old) are each more common?
>90% predominant pattern - Tubular - small well-differentiated - Medullary - Agressive, BRAC1 associated, younger patients. Lobular nodular, necrosis. - Papillary - Older patients, often multifocal, early spread. - Mucinous - Older patients, favourable. Phyllodes is a separate cancer.
91
Trastuzumab cannot be given with?
Adriamycin.
92
Name all the pathological specimen prognosic factors for breast cancer:
Node + (most important predictor of distant and LR) Histo subtype and special subtype (e.g Medullary and papillary high risk spread) Grd (Mitosis/10HPF, nuclear pleo, tubule formation) Size and T-Stage LVSI Margins Receptor status Multifocality Surrounding DCIS Ki-67 DNA micro array classification
93
Key minimum criteria for a diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer: Typical Chemo?
1) A rapid onset of erythema (redness), edema (swelling), and peau d'orange appearance (ridged or pitted skin) and/or abnormal breast warmth, with or without a lump that can be felt. 2) Sx present for < than 6 months. 3) Erythema covers at least 1/3 of boob. 4) Initial Bxs show invasive carcinoma. 75% are IDC. Neoadj AC+T + 12months Herceptin if HER2+
94
Definition (including cell of origin) GIST tumours? Associated Syndromes: Key prognostic factors Bio Beh Micro IHC (and why it is relevant)
Soft tissue sarcoma in any part of GIT- arising from interstitial cell of Cajal (regulate contraction of GIT smooth muscle). Syndromes: Carney's Triad (C-kit), NF1, Familial GIST Epi: Rare, M=F, 50-70; almost never occur before 40 Prog: T stage/size and mitotic rate (grd = High/low based on rate) are most important. Absent c-kit (90%C-kit +ve target w/Imitanib), R1/or rupture, site (stomach best location). Beh: Stomach (60%), small bowel (35%), other (rectum, oesophagus, omentum, mesentery) (<5%). IHC: ANO1, DOG1, C-kit (CD99 - targetable with TKI), SDH loss targetable with TKI = sunitinib
95
For GIST Micro (has the same description as???): IHC (and why it is relevant): Mx and role of RT
Micro: Same as mesothelioma: its a "MES" (same as synovial sarcoma) - Spindle - Endothelial - Mixed Also nuclear pallisading. Surgery where possible, -nibs as below, RT in palliative setting. IHC: - DOG1+ (98%) - CD117/ c-KIT + (95%) - target w/ initinib - SDH deficient - Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficient GIST - Target w/sunitinib. STS any part of GIT- arising from interstitial cell of Cajal Epi: Rare, M=F, 50-70; almost never occur before 40 Prog: T stage/size and mitotic rate are most important. Absent c-kit (90%C-kit +ve target w/Imitanib), R1/or rupture, site (stomach best location). Beh: Stomach (60%), small bowel (35%), other (rectum, oesophagus, omentum, mesentery) (<5%).
96
Fanconi anaemia associated cancers:
(tend to be short, scoliosis, pigmented skin lesions). Heam = AML Solid = Head and neck cancer and anogenital cancers are the most diagnosed solid tumors.
97
All of the SCLC paraneoplastics (very broad/vague/Mx steps):
SIADH and LE are most common 1) SIADH: Short-term - fluid restriction, review medications (some anti deps, cisplatin), endocrine review if severe/intractable, consider 3%saline. Main intervention is to treat underlying cause (i.e. tumour debulk). 2) Cushings: adrenal enzyme inhibitors and glucocorticoid antagonists. Debulk underlying cause. 3) Lambert-Eaton (anti v-g Ca2+2 channel antibodies). Initial Mx is prednisone. 4) Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration syndrome. 5) Opsiclonus-Myoclonus
98
Complete Histology for SCLC. Give 3 IHC marker
* Small round blue cells (SRBC) * Neuroendocrine type architecture – nests, trabecula, ribbons, rosette * High N/C ratio, enlarged ovoid nuclei, granular nuclear chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, nuclear moulding, scanty cytoplasm * Salt and pepper chromatin * High mitotic count, along with apoptotic bodies, and areas of necrosis
99
Histologically - Neuroendocrine type architecture can have what features?
Neuroendocrine type architecture = nests, trabecula, ribbons, rosette
100
SCLC IHC - give 3 critical markers, and 3 negative markers.
Synaptophysin+, Chromogranin A+, TTF-1+ Neg: Ck7, p63, CK20 (merkel cell are the only NE cancer that is CK20 +)
101
Adverse prognostic factors for SCLC
Patient: Sex (Female = better; male =worse) ECOG> 0-1 Weight lose = worse Tumour: ES-SCLC Para-neoplastic syndrome (=worse) LDH – increase LDH = worse; increase disease burden, raise concern re: bone marrow involvement Sodium – <135 Albumin low
102
Psanomma bodies occur in what tumours?
Go from head to pelvis: - Menigioma - Prolactinoma - Papillary thyroid cancer - Mesothelioma - Papillary serrous endometrial cancer - Ovarian cystadenoma
103
Ca125 is elevated in?
1) Ovarian cancer 2) Endometrial adenocarcinoma 3) Cervix adenocarcinoma 4) Also, fallopian, breast pancreas and PCOS.
104
Ca 19.9 is elevated in
1) 80-90% of pancreatic Ca 2) Hepatobilliary cancers (705) To a lesser degree in CRC, and stomach cancer
105
Not a dose/technique question. But very high yield. For each tumour marker, state which tumours can elevate it (i.e. not all of these are routine by any means). 1) CEA 2) CA15.3 3) CA 125 4) CA19.9 5) AFP. Give half-life 6)Beta or just hCG. Give half-life 7) LDH 8) Calcitonin 9) NSE 10) S100
1) CEA: Colorectal Ca, colangiocarcinoma, medullary thyroid 2) CA15.3: Breast 3) CA 125: Ovarian 4) CA19.9: Pancreatic Ca 5) AFP: NSGCTs = yolk sac and embryonal, Liver HCC 6)Beta or just hCG: choriocarcinoma, some mixed NSGCTs, and approx 10%seminomas that express it. 7) LDH: Melanoma, Myeloma, Folicular lymphoma, DLBCL 8) Calcitonin: Medullary thyroid ca 9) NSE: can be a marker of SCLC 10) S100: melanoma - not routine at Dx/or ever
106
Normal function of BRCA 1 & 2 Outline approaches to risk reduction for HBOC
Are key proteins involved in homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks. BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pts should have transvaginal USS 1-2/year. Screening with CA-125 is also recommended. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended at age 35-40 for BRCA1, and 40-45 for BRCA2. An increasing number women who test positive for faulty BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes choose to have risk-reducing surgery.
107
e. What are the components of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) score and how is it interpreted? (2)
6 items scored 1 to 3. Score 7-12=potentially unstable, >=12 unstable. Score of 7 or more warrants surgical consultto assess for instability prior to any RT. SINS>12 is a contraindication to SABR. 1) Pain 2) Alignment: 3) Location: rigid=0, semi rigid, mobile, junctional 4) Vert body collapse 5) Posterior elements involved 6) Blastic, mixed, lytic
108
For rhabdomyosarcoma give: Basic epi Most common sites Best and worst prognostic histological pattern
M>F Bi modal peak: 4 and 16 40% occur in H&N, 30% Genitourinary. Good - Embryonal (66%) - 3 subtypes - classic botryoid (10%), spinde (5%). Botryoid and spindle have best prognosis. Worst - Alveolar (30%) - more common in adolescents. More associated with FOXO1 Rare - Undifferentiated = very bad.
109
For breast conservation surgery, what is considered a negative margin:
Histological negative margin = no ink on tumour (for invasive) and >2mm (for DCIS) (as per ASCO/ NCCN guidelines)
110
Histology for Kaposi sarcoma: IHC:
Slit-like vascular spaces formed by spindled endothelial cells with minimal-moderate atypia Mitosis common, pleomorphism minimal Haemorrhage (extravasated erythrocytes) + hemosiderin + plasma cells are key histological clues HHV8 (also referred to as LANA1) + vascular markers (CD34/ CD31)+ Neg: SMA, desmin, cytokeratin, S100, MelanA
111
The natural Hx of Kaposi sarcomas (also the same for?):
Patch -> Plaque -> Nodule/Tumour. Can say the same for Mycosis fungoides.
112
Describe the second most common variant of BCC (freq, macro, micro, bio beh)
Multifocal Superficial BCC (30%) (nodular are 60%) Macro: Typically occur on trunk, scaly papule, no hyperkeratosis. Micro: Tumour nests growing multifocally from dermis, radial growth with MINIMAL dermal component. Bio Beh: Suitable for topical Mx, but high LRR.
113
Describe mycosis fungoides (and a closely related syndrome)
MF and Sezary syndrome are the most common cutaneous T-Cell lymphomas. MF is rare 6/million/yr - 5% of NHL. M>F (x2) Localised or widespread patches->plaques->tumour, can be generalised erythroderma and puritic. Can spread to nodes and organs Stg IV. Histo: small/medium mononuclear cells in upper dermis, especially at dermal-epiderm junction. IHC: CD3 (if T-cell tumour always say this), also CD2 and CD5 Genetics: no syndromes but TCR and JAK-Stat mutations are common.
114
List your differentials for an adrenal lesion:
A met e.g from lung, adrenal carcinoma, RCC, (is child neuroblastoma), Wilms, benign cyst, abscess
115
How would you differentiate between an adrenocortical carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma?
(adrenocortical (opp for RCC): +ve melanA, inhibin, synaptophysin, vimentin; -ve for PAX2 and 8, CD10, EMA, Cam 5.2)
116
What genetic syndromes are associated with adrenocortical carcinoma?
(Li Fraumeni syndrome and Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome) - Remember the A in SBLA syndrome
117
How would you investigate a thyroid lump:
Full history and thorough physical examination; bloods incl TSH/T3/T4 +/-calcitonin/CEA if medullary ca; FNA thyroid; USS thyroid or thyroid scan Nb. MRI, CT, and PET not done routinely prior to thyroidectomy)
118
What are the risk factors for thyroid ca?
RT esp during childhood incl TBI, H&N, and accidental exposure; iodine insufficiency; Genetic: medullary – familial MTC, MEN 2a, MEN2b; Follicular – Cowden’s; Papillary – Gardner’s, Turcot’s, FAP, familial papillary carcinoma)
119
The conditions associated with MEN syndrome? What is the recommendation regarding thyroidectomy for MEN2 families?
The conditions associated with MEN syndrome? MEN I – pituitary, parathyroid, pancreatic; MEN IIa – phaechromocytoma, parathyroid, medullary thyroid ca; MEN IIb – phaechromocytoma, medullary thyroid ca, mucosal neuroma/marfanoid habitus What is the recommendation regarding thyroidectomy for MEN2 families? Prohylactic thyroidectomy based on specific DNA mutation on RET proto-oncogene)
120
List differentials for a larynx lesion: Difference in clinical and biological behaviour of glottis and supraglottic SCC:
SCC, verrocous SCC, ACC, small cell, lymphoma, sarcoma, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, mucocitis/infection. Glottic – tend to present with hoarseness/odynophagia and otalgia, unusual to have neck mass as virtually no LN drainage. Supraglottic – tend to present with hoarseness/odynophagia/dysphagia/neck mass/otalgia/airway obstruction due to rich lymphatics and absence of barriers which promotes early bilateral LN spread to nodal spread levels II-IV.
121
Ewings key cytologic abnormality:
90% harbour a somatic reciprocal translocation, t(11;22) causing EWSR1-FLI1 fusion.
122
How are osteosarcomas classified by histology?
1) Classic - 3 types: - Osteoblastic: 50% cases; abundant production of osteoid - Chrondroblastic: 25%; differentiation towards cartilage - Fibroblastic: spindle cell stroma with “herring bone” pattern similar to fibrosarcoma 2) Telangetasic 3) Small cell
123
RCC IHC?
PAX 8, PAX2, EMA. CK7 negative
124
RCC clear cell histology? What is the worst prognosis RCC variant? How common is it?
Compact or nested growth. Cells have clear or granular abundant cytoplasm. Fine but prominant capillary network. IHC PAX 2 and PAX8 Sarcomatid RCC (sRCC) 5% of RCCs. Worst prognosis (followed by clear cell)
125
3 subtypes of marginal zone lymphoma
Itself a "subtype" of Low grade NHL: 1. Nodal marginal zone lymphoma 2. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma – no need for immediate therapy; consider splenectomy 3. Extra-nodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (MALT)
126
MALT IHC
Heterogenous small B cells including marginal zone (centrocyte-like) cells, mono-cytoid-like cells, small lymphocytes and scattered immune-blasts - Plasma cell differentiation often present B cell+ CD79 andCD 20. Germinal marker negative (eg CD10) - since matured to the margins. T-cell marker -ve (CD3-, CD5-)
127
DDx for Wilms?
Neuroblastoma Rhabdo RCC Clear cell
128
What is anaplasia?
Anaplasia refers to the loss of differentiation of cells) (~5%) 3 cytological abnormalities: 1) Mitotic figures 2) Nuclear enlargement (3x or more than normal) 3) Hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei * Anaplasia may be diffuse or focal (even in one or two foci indicate poor prognosis) * Related to high rates of relapse and death
129
What are the steps of sentinel lymph node biopsy? - What are the adv and disadv? - What tumours are they used for?
1) Injection of blue dye/radioactive substance around tumour; 2) Injected material is located visually and/or with device that detects radioactivity from radionuclide (Geiger counter; sentinel node appears in 5-60mins; node is then removed and checked for tumour cells). Adv – presence of occult or micromets may alter treatment approach, reduces unnecessary LN dissection thereby eliminating increased risk of lymphoedema, infection and wound breakdown, used to prognosticate; Disadv – false negative rate 5%. Breast and melanoma; also vulva, merkel, penile, endometrial Ca (investigational)
130
The boob: What node stage is +ve SCF node? Options
N3c SEER database known to have a very poor prognosis (still stage 3), potentially curable. >60Gy is asosciated with better outcomes. I would give 40Gy/15# (or 50/25) then boost to 60Gy in 2Gy/#. Brachial plexus OAR 66Gy).
131
Cancers that are most likely to cause bone mets? What are the most common lytic bone metastases?
"PB KTL" = Lead (Pb Kettle) Prostate, Breast, Kidney (RCC), Thyroid, Lung Solid/scerotic = Prostate Mixed = Breast. Lytic = KTL Also lytic = Melanoma and myeloma.
132
Broad epidem and risk factors for Ependymoma: Histo, and IHC Which are grd 1? Which is grd 2, grd 3 and 4? Role of grade beyond prognostics? What is more prognostic than grade?
- Rare <10% of CNS tumours - Bimodal age: <5 and 30-40 - 90% CNS, 10% spinal (especially Myxopapillary in adults) RFs: NF2, no other clear RFs Histo: Monomorphic round to oval cells with speckled chromatin. Perivascular pseudorosettes and, less frequently, true ependymal rosettes. IHC: GFAP, EMA, S100 Grd 1 = sub ependymoma and myxopapillary Grd 2 = "Classic" Grd 3 = Anaplastic Grd 4 = ependymablastoma - basically a medullo. Grade, location (spine, cranium),extent of resection, mets, determine RT dose/technique (i.e. mets get 36/20 CSI). Molecular subtype (there are 9) is more prognostic. 1q gain is bad (opposite of neuroblastoma)
133
How many molecular subgroups of Ependymoma are there? Which has the best and which has the worst prog?
There. are nine (including divisions between kid = A and adult =B) WOrst post-fossa Group A Best Myxopapillary
134
Unfav MALT cytogenetics?
t(11,18) - predicts resistance to Abx.
135
What are the presenting symptoms of craniopharynigiomas? What are the different subtypes of craniopharyngiomas? What are the pathological features of craniopharyngiomas?
Sx: Increased ICP – (headaches, vomiting, altered mentation), visual changes eg. bitemporal hemianopia, Endocrine e.g. diabetes insipidus, panhypopituiarism. Types: Adamantinomatous mostly seen in paeds Papillary - mostly adults Path Features: Adamantinomatous – poorly circumscribed NESTS of EPITHELIUM; peripheral cells show nuclear palisading; contents resembles crank case oil; stellate reticulum, wet keratin, calcification and xanthogranulomatous inflammation. Papillary – well-circumscribed CORES of STROMAL CELLS; no wet keratin, no calcification, and fluid does not resemble crank case oil; IHC – CK 20 and CK8 –ve
136
What colorectal polyp features are considered high risk? Name some benign polyps:
Size>1cm, sessile serrated, High grade dysplasia. Hyperplastic Polyp Hamartoma (also a good differential in: lungs, skin, heart, breast, liver). Divertucular Polyp Inflammatory Polyp.
137
DDx for a rectal polyp
Malignant: AdenoCa Carcinoid GIST Sarcoma - leimyosarcoma, angisarcoma Met Benign: Hyperplastic poly Unfammatory polyp Hamatoma Diverticular polyp
138
Intermediate favourable prostate cancer:
Only one of the following: T2b (more than 1/2 of one lobe) –T2c (both), or GS 3 + 4 = 7/grade group 2, or PSA 10–20 ng/mL, and Percent of positive biopsy cores <50%
139
Intermediate unfavourable prostate cancer:
Automatic Unfav if - Gleason 4+3 (ISUP 3) - &/Or, >50%cores. 2 or 3 intermediate risk factors: GS 3 + 4 PSA 10–20 ng/mL T2b–T2c
140
High risk prostate cancer:
T3a OR Gleason 8 or higher (if 5+any then very high risk) OR PSA>20
141
Define very High-risk prostate cancer
Very high risk: T3b–4 (tumour in SV or organ invasion) or Primary GS 5 or >4 cores with GS 8–1
142
Urothelial Carcinoma general histo and IHC What is grade based on?
Spindle and pyramidal cells invading basement membrane. HMWCK GATA3 CL7, p63. Negative for PSA and AMACR PAX8. Grading based on atypia and mitotic figures.
143
Up to what stage may surgery be considered for cervix cancer? Give the Peters criteria: Give the Sedlis Criteria:
Disease localised to the cervix AND less than 2cm (Stage IA and IB1) OR IIA (upper 2/3rds of vag) NB: 1B2 (limited to the cervix but big = 2 to 4cm) = Chemo RT Peters (for post op chemo) = 3Ps = Parametrial Invasion, Pos Margin, Pos Node Sedlis (for adj RT) = SDLvi = based on size>4cm, deep or middle stromal invasion, LVI
144
List the DDx for a cervical lesion on colposcopy:
SCC, cervical adenocarcinoma, Adenosquarmous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, Endometrial endometriod carcinoma Endometrial papillary serrous adenocarcinoma Small cell carcinoma Undifferentiated Sarcoma Lymphoma Metastais Melanoma Benign: Cervical ectropian
145
List the tumours associated with NF2:
NF 2 MEN sounds like a 90s boy band Meningioma - 25% lifetime risk Ependymoma (especially spibal) Neruomas: accousric/Schwannoma
146
Poor prognostic for Ewings: Specifically give cytogenetics:
MASSive LDH response Male, Age >17years, size>8cm, Site (Pelvis/Trunk is bad). Elevated LDH, poor response to chemo. Cytogenetics - 90% T(11,22), 10% t(21,22) = bad.
147
IHC Ewings vs Osteo
Both: CD 99, S100, vimentin Ewings: Fli1, SAPB2 Osteosarcoma:
148
Differential for a paediatric bone tumour: State where each may most likely occur in long bone:
Osteosarc - metaphysis Giant cell - epiphysis Ewings - diaphysis.
149
NF1 associated tumours
LG and High grade gliomas Osteosarcoma Other sarcomas Leukaemia Papillary thyroid Prostate and breast
150
The CK7 positive tumours:
Lung adeno Kidney (PAX 8) Colorectal (upper GI are CK7 -, but CDX2 +) Liver Adrenal adenocarcinoma Cholangiocarcinoma
151
The Ck20 positive tumours
Colon cancer (90%), Merkel cell tumor (86%), Urothelial carcinoma (68%), gastric adeno (56%), and pancreatic carcinoma (56%)
152
Cavernous sinus nerves/signs you'd check if invasion: Exiting foramina for CNV
III, IV, V(1 and 2), IV Oculomotor: upper eyelid, down and out Trochlea - upward gaze Abducens = lateral rectus palsy. Diplopia V1: supra orbital fissure ->supraorbital notch V2: Rotundum V3: Ovalis
153
IHC for: HCC Cholangiocarcinoma
HCC: Hep Par1 AFP Glycogen3. CK7 neg Cholangio: Ck7 CEA
154
Compare histo of HCC to Cholangiocarcinoma
HCC: Trabecular (most common) with 4+ atypical hepatocytes surrounded by flattened endothelial cells - Sinusoidal vessels surrounding tumour cells Cholangio: - Sclerosing with malignant gland - Desmoplastic stroma - Resemble duct rather than hepatocytes
155
Worst prognosis ependymoma molecular subtypes: Bad cytogenetic change?
Patients with EPN-PFA, EPN-ZFTA, and EPN-MYCN tumors showed the worst outcome with 10-year overall survival rates of 56%, 62%, and 32%. EPM-MYC Also bad is 1q Gain Overall - The five-year survival rate for ependymomas is nearly 85%.
156
Histo for warthins:
Papillary cystic architecture with: Dense lymphoid stroma and a double layer of oncocytic epithelium.
157
What is a Chordoma? Where do they occur? Doses?
Chordoma is a slow growing cancer of tissue found inside the spine (thought to arise from notocord remnant). Chordoma can happen anywhere along the spine. It is most often found near the sacrum (33-50%) or Clivis (33%) Smaller treat 25/5 Otherwise >60Gy needed if primary Tx. R1 resection 54/30.
158
Describe the four major steps in the development of HPV related cervical cancer (2m)
Infection: 50%clear 8 months, 90%2yrs, 10% persistent, 10% precursor, 10% malig Persistence: Failure to clear (e.g. due to immune sup), viral host genome integration Precursor Lesion: Development of high grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL) - Increased risk with multi-parity, long-term OCP use, and smoking Malignant invasion: Transformation into cancer
159
Genetic syndromes associated with RCC
1. VHL 2. Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer (HLRCC) 3. Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome 4. Hereditary papillary RCC
160
Haematuria work up:
Hx exam for clinical/symptomatic anaemia, bladder mass, DRE (after PSA), bowel/bladder changes Urine: cyctology, MSU Bloods: Hb, renal function, PSA. CT KUB Consider Cytoscopy Bx. Digrected imaging such as staging CT/PET and MRI based on above.
161
Define myeloma/plasmacytoma. Key epidemiology features of this group: Key risk factors:
A plasma/BC-cell neoplasm that secretes monoclonal gamma immunoglobulins (M-Proteins). 80%IgG, followed by IgA. Does not occur in kids Very rare before age 35 Mean age 70 Age, toxic exposures, family Hx, immunesupression
162
Key differences between MGUS, Smouldering and multiple myeloma.
MGUS - very common in ppl age >70 (~5%) 1%/year risk transformation. No CRAB - SPEP <3ng/L, BMAT<10% clonal plasma cells. Smouldering: NO CRAB But SPEP >3, and monoclonal cells>10% on BMAT.
163
Subtyping and grading of Lung AdenoCa:
Lung Adeno is separated into 5 main histological patterns (LAMPS): o Low grade: lepidic o Intermediate grade: Acinar, Papillary o High grade: Micropapillary, Solid
164
Define Limited Stage SCLC
Tumour confined to one hemithorax (including ipsi and contralateral mediastinum) and ipsilateral SCF nodes
165
Prognostic factors in SCLC
Patient: Sex (Female = better; male =worse) ECOG 0-1 Weight lose = worse Tumour: Stage Para-neoplastic syndrome (=worse) LDH – increase LDH = worse; Sodium – Na< 135, MS 9 months vs. Na>135 MS 13 months (P<0.001) Albumin Treatment: Can have durvulmab Can have Etoposide + Platinum
166
Prognostic factors for mesothelioma
Patient: Male Age ECOG Fitness for interventions such as extra-pleural pneumonectomy Tumour: * Histology most important: Epitheloid (best) biphasic (mixed) Sarcomatid (by far the worst - Sarcomatid dont get surgery!) * Stage/nodal involement/distant mets. * Elevated LDH * Hematologic abnormalities (thrombocytosis, leucocytosis, anaemia) Treatment: Chemo and surgery most impactful
167
What is Sézary syndrome?
Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome are types of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. A sign of mycosis fungoides is a red rash on the skin. In Sézary syndrome, cancerous T-cells are found in the blood
168
Micropapilliary breast cancer: Histology How common? Most common in which patients? BioBeh? adj RT approach?
Histo: inside out growth pattern. Typically Er+ 4-5% of invasive breast. Typically early post-meno Relative to IDC NST: faster local growth, earlier nodal spread, more frequently multifocal. I would boost these patients.
169
Histologic features of DCIS: Histologic subtypes: Which subtypes have worse prognosis?
DCIS implies that the basement membrane is preserved despite carcinoma in situ cells arising from the ductal epithelium. Typically grows toward nipple. Nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic rate and cell morphology determine grade: I,II or III Encompasses a heterogeneous groupin terms of histomorphology, underlying geneticss, biomarkers and potential for progression. Five histologic subtypes (mnemonic: C2PMS): cribriform, comedo (worst prognosis), papillary, micropapillary, solid (second worst prog). prognosis).
170
4 criteria for radiation-induced malignancies:
(1) presence of tumor in a previously irradiated region, (2) sufficient latency time between the original and new tumors, generally measured in years, (3) histology of the new tumor must be distinct from the original, (4) no Hx of disease predisposing to tumor development (e.g. Li Fraumeni) Other features: Often sarcomas occurring 5-10years post - e.g angiosarcoma for breast, or characteristic tumours at a given site - e.g. mucoepidermal carcinoma of parotid after oral scc RT. Or leukaemia after pelvic RT.
171
Underlying mechanism of radiation induced second malignancy:
The fundamental insult is DNA damage (single &/or double strand breaks, &/or base changes) via direct ionizing radiation or indirect ionised mediators (i.e ROS). This damage is not or is improperly repaired, and the cell escapes immune surveillance carrying either mutations, or changes to gene expression. Another mechanism is ocogenic viral activation. Radiation oncogenesis has been compared to chemical carcinogenesis: with 3 steps - Initiation, Promotion, progression.
172
Outline the steps of chemical carcinogenesis:
3 steps = Initiation, promotion, progression: Initiation: Irreversible genetic alteration via direct injury from carcinogen or metabolically activate carcinogen (procarcinogen) to DNA such as adducts that are not repaired (or inappropriately repaired). Promotion: Initiated cell evades immune surveillance/apoptosis, and these premaligant cells undergo enhanced proliferation. Progression: Genome/karyotype instability and maligant transformation with invasive growth.
173
Chemical risk factors for bladder cancer (they fucking love this question): Drugs that increase risk:
Occupational exposures across a wide range of industries (e.g. plastics/metal fabrication/hairdressing) have been linked to bladder cancer. In particular: Aromatic hydrocarbons, disel exhaust, hair and textile dyes. Drugs that increase risk: Cyclophosphamide Pioglitazone Some old analgesia discontiinued in the early 1980s
174
Regarding squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: (3m) i. List the risk factors ii. Describe the pathogenesis
Risk factors: - Smoking - Schistosomiasis infection - Chronic irritation e.g. from recurrent UTI, bladder calculi, indwelling catheter ii. PATHOGEN: Chronic irritation and injury to the urothelial lining → squamous metaplasia → dysplasia → carcinoma in situ → squamous cell lining of the bladder with keratinisation and intercellular bridging → squamous cell carcinoma
175
Describe the role of E6 and E7 proteins in the molecular pathogenesis of HPV related squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (4m)
E6 protein binds and facilitates degradation of p53 tumour suppressor protein * Normal p53: DNA damage -> p53 up-regulated CDK1-p21 -> inactive cyclin-CDK complex -> cell cycle halted at the G1/S check point * Degraded/ absent p53: G1/S check point disrupted -> progression through G1/S check with damaged DNA. E7 protein binds to and phosphorylate Rb protein (tumour suppressor) * Normal: Rb binds to and inhibit E2F transcription factor (in G1 checkpoint of all cell cycle) * E7 binds to and phosphorylate Rb -> release of E2F transcription factor -> transition of cell from G1 to S phase of cell cycle with damaged DNA
176
Broadly give the Masoka stages. When may RT be indicated?
I: No capsular invasion II: A= microsopic invasion. B=macroscopic III: Invasion into adjacent structures IVa: Mets to pleura and pericardium Ivb: distant mets. RT from IIA to IVA "curative intent"
177
Give the spectrum of thymus tumours:
WHO A->AB->B->BC-C A- Medullary Spindle cells NO lymphocytes (AB has some). B = Lymphocyte Rich. B2 Thymus begins to look abnormal, OS drops to 60%@5yrs B3= Well differentiated thymic carcinoma with few lymphocytes. = Thymic carcinoma5-yr OS 35%
178
Work up anterior mediastinum tumour:
* FBE/ UEC/ CMP. Consider lymphoma/LDH * beta-HCG and AFP (?germ cell tumour) * Thyroid function test (?thyroid primary) * Serum anti-ACh antibodies to assess for myasthenia gravis (before surgery) * CT chest with contrast * FDG PET * Lung function test * If thymoma suspected and considered resectable, Bx may be omitted and resection performed * If unresectable/inoperable, do core bx to confirm Dx (Bx should not violate pleural space!)
179
Prognostic factors for pancreatic cancer:
Patient: Ecog, age, fit for surgery, ongoing risk factors Tumour: TYpe: ductal adeno w/squarmous compnent is worse. Acinar very slightly better than ductal (5yr OS 10 vs 5%) Grade and Kloppel grade Invasion (i.e resectability) Location: Head of panc better (earlier presentation, more resectable). TNM. Treatment: Rescetable = 25% 5yr OS. +margin shit OS.
180
The potential value of tumour markers in adenocarcinoma of unknown primary (ACUP) work up: (1.5 marks)
May help suggest a diagnosis or direct further investiation (e.g. colonoscopy for CEA++). The adenocarcinoma markers: CEA: CRC, cholangio, gastric CA125: Ovarian CA15.3: Boob CA 19.9: Pancreas PSA LDH is elevation is a poor prognostic sign.
181
Immunohistochemisty approach to CUP/ACUP:
Initial cytokeratins: CK7, CK20 upper GI primary CK7+, CK20- lower Ck7- CK20+ Target cytokeratins: GATA3 - Breast CDX2 - colorectal (especially if CK20+) TTF-1 - Lung PAX8 - Ovarian/endometrial (RCC is PAX 8 and PAX2) Non-cytoketatins: ER and PR.
182
Good prognostic factors for Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary (2 marks):
- NB CUP (e.g. SCC) has better prog than ACUP. - Single metastatic site - Aim surgical excision or ablative. - Tumour can put in a clincicopathological subgroup (about 40%): E.g. Female with axillary lymph mets, female with carcinomatis peritonii - where tumour directed treatment offers better OS. - Comprehensive Molecular Profile or Tumour Molecular Burden suggest targetable mutation or response to immunotherapy. - Good response to initial therapy
183
General Mx paradigm for ACUP:
If markers/IHC and Ix fail to identify: 1) Molecular cancer CLASSIFIER assay - can "predict" to some degree in in about 60% of cases. 2) Establish actionable mutations (Comprehesive Molecular Profile) and predictors of of response to immunotherapy - Tumour Mutational Burden (Mutations create neoantigens that the immune system may attack - e.g. T-cell directed Ipilumimab). Tx: If solitary met (much better prognosis) aim resection or ablative. If belongs to a clinicopathological subgroup (30-40%) e.g. Female with axillary mets (better prog), Female with peritoneal carcinomatosis, dude with bone mets and elevated PSA - then directed therapy has much better PFS. If target mut, or high TMB score, then directed therapy. If and only if none of the above "Empiric Chemo" doublet w/platinum: Classic combos Carbo Pac, Cis Gem.