Patrimonial consequences of divorce Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

What are the patrimonial consequence of marriage determined by?

A

The matrimonial systems that governs the marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What will happen to the estate of the spouse if they are married on community of property?

A

The divorce order will automatically divide the estate into two unless unless a forfeiture of patrimonial benefits order is granted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by a forfeiture of patrimonial benefits order?

A

the court says one spouse must forfeit their share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens in the case where the spouses doesn’t agree to the division?

A

a LIQUIDATOR may be appointed to sell the assets, pay the debts and distribute the remainder of the money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which sections of the Divorce Act regulates the issue of pension interest?

A

Section 7(7) and 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which section of the divorce act regulates the distribution of assets?

A

S7(3) and S6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does S7(3) says?

A

It give the court the discretion to to make an order for distribution of assets for certain marriages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the intention of the order for the distribution of assets?

A

to assist parties who did not have the accrual system available to them when they were married.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Whom of the parties is entitled to apply for the court order?

A

Either of the spouses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can the spouse request that all/some of the assets be transferred to the spouse?

A

Yes, however the court will conclude such in a divorce order if they think it’s fair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when can the distribution of assets be ordered?

A

Cases of divorce only not death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When should the application for the distribution of assets be made?

A

During the divorce proceedings not after the divorce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which date determines the assets and liabilities?

A

The date in which the order is made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cana the order be made if the defendant is insolvent?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the stages that need to be followed for the distribution of assets to apply?

A
  1. We check to which marriages does the court discretion apply to?
  2. What must the applicant prove?
  3. What is the quantum/extent of the transfer?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which section regulates the first stage?

17
Q

Which marriages does the discretion apply to ?

A
  1. Marriages before 1 November 1988 with an ANC excluding, community of property, community of profit and loss and accrual.
  2. Black persons who were married before 2 December 1984 and after 14 April notified the director general of home affairs to keep the matrimonial system.

And there is no deed of settlement.

18
Q

Which section regulates the second stage?

19
Q

What must the applicant prove?

A

The must prove on the balance of probabilities that they contributed directly or indirectly through a positive act to the growth/ maintenance of the other spouse during the marriage.

20
Q

In which forms can the contribution be made in terms of S7(4) ?

A

in the form of rendering services,
- saving expenses, or
- made in any other manner.

21
Q

What does the case of Beamount v Beamount says?

A

Held that the mere fulfilling of wife’s “traditional role” as wife and mother IS such a contribution (limiting of expenses, rendering of services, etc).

22
Q

What does the case of Kritzinger v Kritzinger?

A

He tried to claim for contribution of assets saying that he declined a job offer overseas because he was supporting the wife’s career, the claim failed

23
Q

What happened in Katz v Katz?

A

The court held that even indirect contributions counts even though they cannot be measured in money.

24
Q

What is the court’s discretion to transfer the assets in addition to the factual analysis?

A

Because of the contribution, it must be EQUITABLE AND JUST for the Court to order the transfer of assets. (Discretion)

25
Which section regulates the third stage?
Section 7(5)
26
Which guidelines are set out in S7(5) ?
1. The nature and the extent of the direct/indirect contribution of the spouse 2. The existing means of the parties. (assets and liabilities) 3, Donations made from one spouse to the other which is enforceable by an antenuptial contract 4. Any court orders that have ordered forfeiture of benefits. 5. any OTHER FACTOR which the court wishes to take into account (wide discretion
27
What are the general principles that the court must take into account?
1. Misconduct. (Not to punish the spouse) 2. Starting point 3. Maintenance order 4. Clean break principle 5. pension fund 6. Trust fund (alter ego) Confirmed in bardenhorst case 7. Payment be deferred 8. Sum of money be paid instead of assets
28
When will misconduct be taken into consideration?
where there is “a conspicuous disparity” between the spouses’ conduct
29
What is a conspicuous disparity?
very clear and noticeable difference between how each spouse behaved during the marriage.
30
What is conspicuous disparity also referred to as?
The conservative approach.
31
What did the judge say in the case of Buttner v Buttner about the application of the conservative approach?
That it should only be applied if not doing so will result in not being fair.
32
Which rules do not apply to our law?
One third rule and 50/50 rule.
33
Which starting point was rejected in the case of Bounemount v Bounemnout
That in the constitutional dispensation of equality, the assets should be divided equally unless there was a reason no to do so.
34
Why was the starting point rejected?
1. The approach was based on English law which differs from SA in terms of both the common law and the legislation. 2. According to our law, the parties can choose not to be married out of COP by a way of ANC and this is not the case in the English law. Although such marriage can result in unfairness this was the the precise reason for the enactment of S7(3) 3. Applying the starting point will be going against older court decisions like Beamount v Beaoumunt
35
Why was S7(3) of the divorce act enacted?
This section was created specifically to provide fairness in divorce cases where the strict application of the matrimonial property system (like out of community of property without accrual) would otherwise lead to an unjust result.
36
What does Brandon say about S7(3) ?
He said that the parliament deliberately created the section to limit the court's ability to interfere in the agreement of spouses, one of the limitation is that it applies only to marriages that were entered into before the matrimonial property Act
37
What happened in the case of Buttner v Buttner?
In the case of Buttner v Buttner, the court did divide assets equally — but only after looking carefully at all the facts of that specific case. This means that equal division may happen in some cases, but not because of a rule or starting point. It’s a result based on what is fair in that particular situation.