perception Flashcards

1
Q

sensation

A

physical stimulation of the five senses detected by sense receptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

perception

A

brain interpreting and organising sensory info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

difference between sensation and perception

A

sensation is detection of stimulus
perception is interpretation of what stimulus means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ponzo illusion

A

misinterpreted depth cue
perceived horizontal line in longer than bottom line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

muller lyer illusion

A

misinterpreted depth cue
two vertical lines same length
line with outgoing fins seen longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

rubin’s vase

A

ambiguous figure
face and vase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ames room

A

misinterpreted depth cue
trapezoid room
people seen as different sizes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

binocular depth cues

A

need both eyes to judge distance size depth etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

retinal disparity

A

eyes six cm apart so diff view of world
retina receives visual info
different between info gives info on distance
closer object more disparity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

convergence

A

object coming towards us causes eyes to come together
muscles work harder when eyes come together
muscle info tells ur distance and depth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

monocular depth cues

A

need only on eye to judge distance depth size etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

height in plane

A

objects higher up in the visual field = further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

relative size

A

objects appear smaller in the visual field than known objects of similar size so they are perceived as further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

occlusion obscured objects look further away

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

linear perspective

A

parallel lines appear closer together and come to a point in distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

size constancy

A

objects perceived as constant size despite size on retina changing with distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

misinterpreted depth cue

A

brain perceives distance
objects in the distance are scaled up to look normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ponzo illusion explanation

A

converging lines appear illusion of distance
mentally enlarges top line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

muller lyer explanation

A

ingoing fins appear as shape of outside building do scaled down
outgoing fins appear as outside of building so scaled up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ambiguous figures

A

two possible interpretations
brain can’t decide which one is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

necker cube explanation

A

cube upwards to the right or downwards to left

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

fiction

A

seeing something that isn’t there

23
Q

kanizsa triangle explanation

A

illusory contours create image of second triangle

24
Q

gregory’s constructivist theory

A

make sense of the world by building our perceptions based on info we know and past cues

25
inference
what we perceive is ambiguous and incomplete brain fill in gaps in our sensory info using inference / interpretation
26
visual cues (gregory’s theory)
brain has help when making interpretations using visual cues sometimes what we interpret can turn out wrong
27
role of nurture in gregory’s theory
understanding of visual cues learnt from experience perception more sophisticated as we grow up
28
strength of gregory’s theory
support from studies that show cultural differences in perception different experiences have affected perception nurture plays key role
29
weakness of gregory’s theory
supported by visual illusions which are unusual examples of perception idea of mistake hypotheses has been useful to explain visual illusions but these are artificial 2D images designed to fool us doesn’t explain daily perception
30
weakness of gregory’s theory
cannot explain how perception works in first place babies have perceptual abilities not all perception is role of nurture struggles to explain innate perception
31
gibson direct theory
perception doesn’t draw on past experiences
32
sufficient info for perception
sensation and perception are same eyes detect everything we need without making inferences
33
optic flow partterns
when moving, things in distance appear stationary and everything else rushes past perceptual info about speed and distance
34
motion parallax
monocular depth cue when moving past them closer objects appear to move faster than objects that are further away info about speed and distance
35
influence of nature
perception is innate not learnt
36
strength of gibsons theory
developed using research with pilots his work meant his theory was good at explaining how everyday perception of things like movement and depth occur real world relevance
37
weakness of gibson theory
difficult to explain perceptual errors apparently all we need to perceive is the rich info at retina our brain makes perceptual errors and draws wrong conclusion gregory’s theory is better at explaining illusions
38
strength of gibsons theory
research with young infants provided support gibson and walk 1960 showed infants were reluctant to go over the visual cliff unlikely that their reluctance was from something they learnt as they were very young some parts of human perception is innate supporting his theory
39
culture affecting perception
different cultures use depth cues differently so have diff perceptual set
40
emotion affecting perception
emotion affects perceptual set eg perceptual defence where our brain blocks out upsetting or embarrassing things
41
gilchrist and nesbergs aim
find out if food deprivation affects perception of food if motivation is a factor that’s affects perception
42
gilchrist and nesbergs method
participants either deprived of food for 20 hours or not as a control group shown 4 slides of meal 15 mins each the same switched off and on again and asked to adjust lighting
43
gilchrist and nesbergs results
food deprived people perceived food as brighter the longer the deprived of food
44
gilchrist and nesbergs conclusion
sensitivity greater when food deprived hunger motivating factor of perception of food participants saw food as brighter and more appealing
45
strength of gilchrist and nesbergs study
support from other studies sanford deprived participants of food for varying lengths of time showed ambiguous figures more food deprived more likely to perceive pictures as food increased validity
46
weakness of gilchrist and nesbergs study
unethical to deprive people of food although with consent participants may have not understood how hard it was and felt uncomfortable to withdraw as it would spoil the study unfair for participants to go hungry for an experiment
47
weakness of gilchrist and nesbergs study
aspects of study were not like everyday life asked to judge pictures of food rather than real food judging pictures for brightness is not something we do daily decreases generalisability
48
bruner and minturns study’s aim
if interpretation of an ambiguous figure was affected by context it was shown
49
bruner and minturns method
ambiguous figure either B or 13 independent groups design either shown sequence of letters or numbers participants report and draw what they saw
50
bruner and minturns results
more likely to see ambiguous figure as letter if corresponding sequence was letters vice versa
51
bruner and minturns conclusion
expectation is an important influence of perceptual set changing context in which visual information presented can change the way it’s perceived
52
weakness of bruner and minturns study
ambiguous figure was used to test expectation which isn’t something we come across in daily life designed to trick participants on some occasions we may come across these kind of situations eg misreading spelling mistake but rare
53
weakness of bruner and minturns study
independent groups design used individual differences between groups design eg more peoples name started with B in one group than other participants variables may have affected so it’s weak
54
strength of bruner and minturns study
can explain errors people make in real world US navy cruiser shot down civilian plane thinking it was military he was in a military area therefore raised expectations that it was military plane importance of expectation helps to avoid errors of judgement