Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Psychology > Perception > Flashcards

Perception Flashcards

(66 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

Sensation

A

Information coming into the brain through stimulating the 5 senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perception

A

Brain interpreting sensory information to give it meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of depth cue

A
  • monocular
  • binocular
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Monocular depth cue

A

Depth cue interpreted through 1 eye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Monocular Depth Cues

A
  • height in Plane
  • relative Size
  • occlusion
  • linear Perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Height in Plane

A

Objects higher up in our visual field appear further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Relative Size

A

The more distant an object, the smaller it will be on your retina

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Occlusion

A

An object overlapping another will appear closer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Linear Perspective

A

Parallel line that appear to get closer together in the distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Binocular depth cue

A

Depth cue interpreted through 2 eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Binocular Depth Cues

A
  • retinal Disparity
  • convergence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Retinal Disparity

A
  • difference between an image from the right and left eye
  • brain compares info from each eye to judge distance
  • bigger difference means object is closer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Convergence

A
  • muscular information provided by angle of focus
  • eyes point closer together when object is nearer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gibson’s direct theory of perception DATE

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gibson’s direct theory PARTS

A
  • perception
  • optical array
  • bottom-up
  • motion parallax
  • optic flow patterns
  • nature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gibson’s direct theory PERCEPTION

A

Sensation and perception are the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Gibson’s direct theory OPTICAL ARRAY

A

Optical array (field of vision) contains enough info for us to directly perceive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Gibson’s direct theory BOTTOM-UP

A

Eyes tell brain what is being perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Gibson’s direct theory OPTIC FLOW PATTERNS

A
  • evidence of direct perception
  • e.g - rushing towards stationary point, object appears still, surroundings blur in FOV, ‘flow’ is direct signal to brain we are moving
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Gibson’s direct theory MOTION PARALLAX

A
  • monocular depth cue
  • e.g in car - furthest things (sheep in distant field) appear to move slowly, nearest things (nearby hedges) whiz by quickly
  • helps more accurately perceive depth/distance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Gibson’s direct theory NATURE

A

Important as we are born with perceptual abilities (innate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Gibson’s direct theory STRENGTHS

A
  • developed using real world research
  • Gibson studied pilots in WW2 landing planes with damaged instruments, concluded they were relying on motion parallax and other depth cues (like ground texture)
  • good ecological validity
    +
  • supporting research from infants
  • Gibson and Walk (1960) - human/other infants reluctant to crawl over safe steep visual cliff drop
  • suggests they were born with innate perceptual abilities, theory has more real-world validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Gibson’s direct theory WEAKNESS

A
  • struggles to explain how visual illusions trick brain
  • e.g. Ame’s room - brain struggles to understand people are same size
  • goes against theory as we should be able to directly perceive it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Explanations of Visual Illusions

A
  • ambiguous figures
  • misinterpreted depth cues
  • fiction
  • size constancy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Ambiguous figures
When there are 2 possible interpretations of the same image - brain finds it hard to choose
26
Misinterpreted depth cues
Brain tricked into interpretting distance when it isn’t there
27
Fiction
Shapes using illusory contours to suggest something else is there when it isn’t
28
Size constancy
Keeping original perception of size of an object, even when information received by eyes changes
29
Visual illusions
- Ponzo illusion - Müller-Lyer - Rubin's vase - Ames room - Kanizsa triangle - Necker cube
30
Ponzo Illusion Explanation
- **misinterpreted depth cues** - linear perspective - two outer lines converging give impression of depth - past experiences - train tracks - brain mentally enlarges top line
31
Müller-Lyer Explanation
- **misinterpreted depth cues** - past experiences - unconsciously perceive inwards arrows as inside corner of building (stretching towards us), outwards arrows as outside corner of building (stretching away from us) - perceive line as longer when arrows point inwards
32
Rubin’s Vase Explanation
- **ambiguous figure** - 2 equally possible interpretations - brain struggles to choose between background/foreground so image appears reversible
33
Ames Room Explanation
- **size constancy** - room is not square, rear wall is slanted further back on the left but appears a normal room at right angles with smaller person on left
34
Kanizsa Triangle Explanation
- **fiction** - illusory contours create impression of another triangle as perceptual system creates image that fills gaps to create something plausible
35
Necker Cube Explanation
- **ambiguous figure** - lacks depth cues - brain can't decide where front is as image perfectly balanced so can be seen from multiple viewpoints
36
Gregory’s constructivist theory DATE
1970
37
Gregory’s constructivist theory PARTS
- top-down - inferences - visual cues - nurture - environment
38
Gregory’s constructivist theory TOP-DOWN
- perception is top-down process - construct our reality using brain to make guesses about what we are perceiving - the brain tells the eyes what to see
39
Gregory’s constructivist theory INFERENCES
Make inferences about what we are perceiving based on past experiences
40
Gregory’s constructivist theory VISUAL CUES
Relied on to help measure things like depth and distance
41
Gregory’s constructivist theory NURTURE
- how we perceive is learnt - things like culture have big impact on how we perceive
42
Gregory’s constructivist theory ENVIRONMENT
- environment we are brought up in will affect how we perceive - e.g - people from West fall for Müller-Lyer illusion (brought up with rectangular buildings), people brought up in rainforest won't mistake depth cues so won't fall for illusion
43
Gregory's constructivist theory STRENGTH
- supporting research evidence - Hudson (1960) found different cultures perceived 2D image of elephant + hunter in different ways - supports idea we learn to perceive through nurture/experiences + rely on visual monocular depth cues like height in plane to perceive
44
Gregory's constructivist theory WEAKNESSES
- opposing research - Fantz (1961) found babies are born with perceptual abilities, would prefer images of human faces from birth - goes against Gregory's nurture idea, suggests some perceptual abilities innate + - opposing theory - Gibson's theory may be better at explaining everyday perception, Gregory's theory explains why we fall for ambiguous visual illusions deliberately designed to trick us (like the Necker Cube) - Gibson's theory may be more ecologically useful
45
Perceptual Set
The tendency or readiness to notice certain aspects of our sensory environment
46
Factors affecting perceptual set
- motivation - expectation - culture - emotion
47
How does motivation affect perceptual set
Wanting something increases it’s attractiveness and we notice it more
48
Gilchrist and Nesburg DATE
1952
49
Gilchrist and Nesburg AIM
- study effects of motivation on perceptual set - see if hunger is motivating factor affecting perception
50
Gilchrist and Nesburg METHOD
- lab experiment - 26 undergraduates - independent groups - half food deprived for 20 hours, half not - showed food (steak,chicken) on projector for 15 seconds, turned off, made to readjust to original brightness - Ps told it was matching pictures exercise
51
Gilchrist and Nesburg RESULTS
- food deprived Ps perceived + made images brighter
52
Gilchrist and Nesburg CONCLUSION
- hunger is motivating factor affecting perceptual set
53
Gilchrist and Nesburg STRENGTH
- similar results in other studies - Sanford (1963) showed food deprived Ps ambiguous pictures, saw brown blobs as burgers - Gilchrist and Nesburg have strong reliability, motivation more likely to be factor affecting perceptual set
54
Gilchrist and Nesburg WEAKNESSES
- ethical issues - protection from harm - discomfort caused, consent given but may not have realised effects so may not have been fully informed - may be considered unethical, may not have been worth it for psychological research + - artificial task - images of food used, when food presented in real life, other sensory factors like smell influence perception - low ecological validity, results may not be applicable to how motivation affects perception of food in real world
55
How does expectation affect perceptual set
When we expect something to happen, we are more likely to notice it
56
Bruner and Minturn DATE
1955
57
Bruner and Minturn AIM
- see if expectation is a factor affecting perceptual set - see if anticipating seeing something makes it more likely you will
58
Bruner and Minturn METHOD
- 24 students - lab experiment - independent groups - 1 condition shown letters A + C stimulus on screen - 1 condition shown numbers 12 + 14 stimulus on screen - both groups flashed ambiguous figure inbetween for 30 milliseconds, looked like B/13 - Ps made to write down what they saw
59
Bruner and Minturn RESULTS
- most Ps shown letters stimulus drew 'C' - most Ps shown number stimulus drew '13'
60
Bruner and Minturn CONCLUSION
Expectation affects perceptual set as Ps perception of ambiguous figure easily influenced by stimulus shown
61
Bruner and Minturn STRENGTH
- explains perceptual errors - US navy cruiser in 1988 shot down civilian plane knowing there was military action nearby, expectation affects perception, knowing context can reduce errors in judgement - gives study real world application
62
Bruner and Minturn WEAKNESSES
- artificial task - ambiguous figures not found everyday, visual illusions deliberately designed to trick us - doesn’t show how everyday perception is affected by expectation, low ecological validity + - problems with experimental design - independent groups, Ps only did 1 condition of IV, may be participant variables, may be Ps whose name begins with 'B' or Ps who are superstitious about '13' - may be weaker reliability of findings
63
Culture
Beliefs and expectations that surround us
64
How does culture affect perceptual set
People from different cultures may perceive same object/situation differently due to the different cultural norms, values, beliefs
65
How does emotion affect perceptual set
- notice things we find exciting - takes longer to perceive something unpleasant - block out things we find threatening
66
Emotion
Strong feeling/mood that has important motivational properties

Psychology (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions